Some of you may be aware that last month there were new royalty rates for internet radio stations established by the Copyright Royalty Board (the CRB). Those rates are retroactive to Jan 1, 2006 and are so high that they would effectively put every internet radio station out of business as they amounted to more than 100% of revenues for most stations. The rates are set to go into effect on May 15, 2007 unless Congress intervenes.
I am very pleased to report that Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) and Rep. Donald Mancullo (R-IL) have introduced the Internet Radio Equality Act. This Act would establish rates for internet radio stations that are much closer to those paid by satellite stations and would allow many stations (though not all) to stay in business. The webcasting businesses with whom I’m working believe strongly that these rates are fair for artists, copyright owners and for internet radio stations.
The bill still needs more co-sponsors and the support of the full House. If you believe that internet radio is worth saving and believe as I do that this bill is a fair solution, please contact your representatives and ask them to co-sponsor this bill and to support it when it reaches the floor for a vote http://www.house.gov…
If you’d like to read the full bill, I’ve made it available at http://www.pbabramso…
The most significant aspects of the bill as they relate to keeping internet radio alive are:
1. The Act nullifies the recent decision of the CRB judges
2. The Act instructs future CRBs that the minimum annual royalty per service may be set no higher than $500. The CRB ruling called for a minimum of $500 “per station” which, in the case of services like Pandora who offer each user a personalized station, would result in royalties due of tens of millions of dollars per year and would make it financially impossible for webcasters to offer personalized stations
3. Establishes a “transitional” royalty rate, until the 2011-15 CRB hearing, of either .33 cents per listener hour, or 7.5% of annual revenues as opted by the webcaster. This is among the most significant changes to the rates set by the CRB which did not provide for a “percent of revenues” payment, instead requiring webcasters to pay on a “per song-per listener” basis. Under the CRB established rates, a station with an average of 500 listeners playing ~16 songs/hour would have to pay ~$75k for 2006 and more than double that by 2010 regardless of their actual revenues. The logic behind the percent of revenue rate is an attempt to match the royalty rate that satellite radio pays.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: Early Worm
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: How Mayor Mike And A Slumlord Invented The “Takeover” Of Aurora
BY: harrydoby
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
All talk, dump the bumper music unless it’s a local garage band, I guess.
A lot of internet radio is broadcast radio put on the internet. The stations are already paying ASCAP and licensing fees for their AM or FM broadcasts. And I don’t think such fees depend on the listener count.
Am I way off base? (Referring to this topic only!)
You are correct that an all-talk radio station would not be subject to the new CRB royalty rates. All stations – Terrestrial (traditional FM/AM), Internet & Satellite – pay to ASCAP, SESAC, BMI etc. – those royalties go to the songwriters, not performers. Historically, there have not been royalties paid to the performer or master/mechanical rights owners as the promotion of radio play was viewed by most as “fair trade” to promote the sales of CDs, concert tickets, merchandise etc., while the ASCAP et al fees were paid to ensure that the original songwriter (publishing rights) were compensated.
Under the current system, AM/FM pays no royalties to the copyright owner/musician, Satellite rates are about 7.5% of revenues and internet radio stations (internet only and FM/AM rebrodcasts) pay these CRB established rates to an entity called SoundExchange which is responsible for paying them out to labels and musicians. The rates established are a “per listener, per song” rate so if a station plays one song to 500 listeners, those rates add up to ~$75k for 2006 and more than double by 2010.
You are also correct that an internet station could play only “garage band” music, but the way the CRB was set up, royalties are due and payable unless the station has specific authorization from the musician/owner to play it for promotional purposes. Some stations will undoubtedly endeavor to focus on doing this. For other stations (i.e. Soma.FM, Radio Paradise etc) who offer niche-programming or simply offer a far more expanded playlist than the music played on most AM/FM stations, it will not be practical for them to try to get waivers/promotional use agreements with thousands of artists. The whole situation has created a battle even within the halls of many record labels where the marketing people want any station that has listeners (FM or internet) to play their music, but legal & finance see the internet as a place to make up for the lost revenues from declining CD sales. It is certainly ironic that all of this is coming into effect at the same time as the major labels have settled multi-million dollar settlements for violating Payola laws and paying to have their music on FM radio.