The GOP will see Democrats’ ethics complaints and raise them one, the Rocky Mountain News reports:
A Republican lawmaker filed an ethics complaint against an education lobbyist on Tuesday, saying she was “deceptive” in an e-mail urging support for the governor’s property tax plan.
Rep. Kent Lambert, R-Colorado Springs, is the lone lawmaker involved, although his letter to the Senate president and House speaker begins, “We are formally lodging a complaint.”
He named Lynne Garramone Mason, the lobbyist for the Colorado Education Association. CEA spokeswoman Deborah Fallin called the complaint baseless, and said it was nothing more than a political attack on Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter.
It is the second ethics complaint filed this year against a lobbyist. In both cases, the lobbyist is accused of using deception in attempts to pass or kill a bill.
In Mason’s case, she sent an “action alert” e-mail about Ritter’s plan to raise money for schools by stabilizing property tax rates. Mason said the plan would take the pressure off of “future cuts to K-12,” which Lambert said was false. He said that under the voter-approved Amendment 23 “it is impossible to cut K-12 funding.”
Lambert is wrong, said Sen. Chris Romer, D-Denver, who helped put Amendment 23 on the 2000 ballot before he was a lawmaker. Romer said Amendment 23 protects about 95 percent of school funding, but not special programs, discretionary spending, capital construction and such.
Mason also maintained that Ritter’s proposal is not a tax increase, while Lambert and nearly every GOP lawmaker argue it is…
If there’s a legitimate claim here, as there appears to be with the investigation proceeding against Colorado Concern erstwhile chairman William Mutch over robocalls targeting Democrats, then Republicans made a smart move by calling it out. Astute observers will remember the unexpected gift Sen. Deanna “Reparations” Hanna handed Republicans just as the scandal around then-Minority Leader Joe Stengel’s 24/7 per diem pay was exploding.
If there isn’t a legitimate claim against the CEA, on the other hand, then Lambert’s complaint will be quickly discredited as tit-for-tat nonsense and halted with much fanfare–which would be bad for the GOP’s credibility in general. And with Democrats running the show, Lambert had better have a more or less airtight case or that’s exactly what will happen.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: Early Worm
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Once this frivilous claim is tossed aside, all it will have done is shed more light on the lobbying tactics of one of the GOP strongests supports, and the House Republicans efforts to protect them.
I would suggest to Minority Leader May to keep his dogs on a leash but since he’s at the center of the controversy it’s almost useless.
“We” are filing a complaint? Both of him? Back to Beginning English, Rep. Singular vs. Plural.
OK, I admit that’s not very substantive, just like his complaint. An email sent to a select audience with a known sender and a way to respond is not the same as an anonymous robocall. And the point of contention is certainly debatable, it’s all in the politicized semantics.
Another Repbublican bust.
Over on cbs4denver.com, they’re reporting on this. They say:
“With Republicans boycotting in protest, legislative leaders decided Wednesday at a closed meeting not to order an ethics investigation of a lobbyist for a teachers union.
“A GOP lawmaker had accused the lobbyist of violating House ethics rules because she did not describe a school funding plan as a tax increase.
“Republican lawmakers stayed away, with House Minority Leader Mike May saying the decision to hold the meeting in secret was a “dangerous new course, because the proceedings of the meeting are sealed from public view.””
Looks to me like the stinky fish belongs to May et al.
They should have to pay attorney fees or damages for bringing a frivolous claim like any other suehappy jerkoff.