U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

60%↑

50%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) David Seligman

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) J. Danielson

(R) Sheri Davis
50%

40%

30%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

40%

40%

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Trisha Calvarese

(D) Eileen Laubacher

90%

20%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Yadira Caraveo

45%↓

40%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 25, 2025 11:14 AM UTC

Gabe Evans Disses Jeff Hurd Over Impending Medicaid Cuts

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

In a story aired yesterday evening on Colorado Public Radio, health care reporter John Daley sat down with Colorado’s most vulnerable Republican Rep. Gabe Evans to talk about his role as a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee in meeting the $880 billion in cuts called for in the budget reconciliation resolution passed by the GOP majorities in both chambers. As he has in previous interviews, Evans once again deflected questions about how his committee can achieve the target for budget cuts without large reductions to Medicaid eligibility that could throw thousands of residents of Evans’ district off the coverage rolls, insisting that the cuts can be achieved painlessly:

Twenty-nine percent of Evans’ 8th District, 214,00 people, are enrolled in Medicaid. That’s among the most in any Colorado district, according to the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing.

If deep Medicaid cuts go through, Colorado could lose as many as 12,000 jobs, $1.3 billion in state economic productivity and $82 million in state and local tax dollars next year. That’s according to a letter Gov. Jared Polis and Lt. Gov. Dianne Primavera sent last week to the members of the state’s Congressional delegation.

Evans, in a statement in response to the letter, accused the governor of misrepresenting the facts.

“I don’t support cuts that harm Colorado providers or patients – I support removing waste and fraud. On Polis’ watch, millions in Medicaid dollars have gone to deceased individuals and illegal immigrants,” he said.

Speaking directly with Daley, Rep. Evans claimed that somewhere around $300 billion over ten years might be saved from cracking down on “waste, fraud, and abuse.” Even if that’s true it’s less than half of the total $880 billion the committee is tasked with cutting–and the assumptions that make up the $300 billion are in many cases dubious. Measures requiring Medicaid patients to prove hardship and seek employment impose burdens that could reduce the number of applicants, but not nearly enough to meet the budget resolution’s targets. Every responsible analysis of the reconciliation plan has stated clearly that there is no mathematical way to do this without hurting real people who need the help they’re getting. That’s why Evans’ freshman Colorado colleague Rep. Jeff Hurd teamed up with a dozen fellow Republicans to declare they won’t support a final “Big Beautiful Bill” that slashes Medicaid funding.

Confronted with this, Evans flat-out says that Jeff Hurd and the so-called “experts” don’t know what they’re talking about:

DALEY: Last week Rep. Jeff Hurd signed a letter with a group of lawmakers urging fellow Republicans in the leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives to preserve and strengthen Medicaid. Here’s a quote from their letter. “We cannot and will not support a final reconciliation bill that includes any reduction in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations.” You did not sign the letter. Why not?

EVANS: So if you go look at that letter, actually nobody from the Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans signed onto that letter. Energy and Commerce, of course, is the committee that has jurisdiction over Medicaid. And I think that’s because those of us that sit on the Energy and Commerce Committee have that assurance, having seen some of the proposals that we’re going to be able to meet that reconciliation number without impacting benefits to lawful beneficiaries of the program, as long as states like Colorado actually work hand in hand with us in order to implement these efficiencies that protect and preserve taxpayer resources for our most vulnerable.

DALEY: So Hurd and the other 11 who signed that letter are wrong? [Pols emphasis]

EVANS: Well, they don’t sit on the committee that has jurisdiction over Medicaid. So I don’t know that the same way that I don’t know the detailed discussions that are happening on committees that I don’t sit on, I don’t know if they have the same level of insight that I have, [Pols emphasis] being a member of the committee with jurisdiction.

It requires a degree of arrogance we do not possess to assert as a freshman member of Congress with no experience whatsoever in health care policy that the Congressional Budget Office, every competent outside analysis of the budget proposal, and now his own Republican colleagues, don’t possess “the same level of insight” that Evans has on this issue. Essentially, Gabe Evans is calling them all stupid.

There are two possible outcomes now: either the Energy and Commerce Committee will produce a bill that realizes the $880 billion in cuts, necessarily slashing Medicaid funding and forcing states like Colorado to throw thousands of patients who vote off the coverage rolls, or the committee will fail to meet that target after recognizing the fiscal, political, and moral impossibility of doing so.

Either way, Gabe Evans has now taken full ownership of this unpopular process, and the outcome. He just declared himself to be the smartest guy in the room.

If Evans wants another term in Congress, everyone else had better be wrong.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Gabe Evans Disses Jeff Hurd Over Impending Medicaid Cuts

  1. Looking forward to seeing how the House Republicans approach the Democratic governors to see if they are willing to "actually work hand in hand with us in order to implement these efficiencies that protect and preserve taxpayer resources for our most vulnerable." Assuming, that is, they are able to twist arms hard enough to make the 11 House Republicans willing to put their names on the letter AND the Senate Republicans who blocked a similar level of instruction for their committee. 

     

  2. Poor Congressman Evans. He has another dimension to his Medicaid headache. Trump announced today in an interview with Time that he will veto any significant cuts to Medicaid. So does Congressman Evans now turn to Medicare and Social Secuirty to meet the required cuts found in the House budget reconciliation resolution? So many budget problems. So many bad political choices.

    1. That can be risky. As we all know, old people are easy to make angry and old people vote. (And if MAGA world is to be believed, old people vote even posthumously.)

      This may finally be that moment when MAGA world realizes that the fictional black welfare heiress about whom Ronald Reagan began the ranting more than four decades ago sponging off the teat of the federal government by collecting AFDC and food stamps is actually a family of poor white trash living in the hills of Kentucky or West Virginia.

      What goes around comes around.

      1. There are, indeed, more people on social assistance in rural areas than in inner cities. As for cutting Social Security or Medicare, Evans may find out what happens when you piss off old people. They've got all the time in the world to make his life miserable

  3. Twenty-nine percent of Evans’ 8th District, 214,00 people, are enrolled in Medicaid. That’s among the most in any Colorado district, according to the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing.

     

    31% in our dear district 3 so HURD is actually trying to represent. 

     

     

    1. It will be awful for anyone stripped of Medicaid.

      In CO-08, the district is compact enough and geographically fixed so the loss of hospitals, care facilities, and clinics won't increase travel times dramatically for those who still maintain health insurance or need a trip to emergency care.    

      CO-03 and CO-04 — the risk is much greater.  With greater distances throughout and, in some portions of the districts, much more challenging geography, any closure could mean (as ColoHealth.com explains):

      • Longer travel distances for emergency or routine care.
      • Reduced access to specialized services or procedures.
      • Overburdened remaining hospitals, leading to longer wait times and reduced quality of care.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

95 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols