(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(D) Julie Gonzales
(R) Janak Joshi
80%
40%
20%
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Hetal Doshi
50%
40%↓
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
50%↑
40%↓
30%
(D) Diana DeGette*
(D) Wanda James
(D) Milat Kiros
80%
20%
10%↓
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Alex Kelloff
(R) H. Scheppelman
60%↓
40%↓
30%↑
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
30%↑
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
55%↓
45%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Shannon Bird
(D) Manny Rutinel
45%↓
30%
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
We’ll let Square State tell the tale:
Here’s the poll summary from a Paccione Press Release I just received:
Despite the findings of several recent public polls, there’s a reason that national Republicans—who notably face an ever growing and quite costly national playing field—have yet to pull their funding from the expensive Denver airwaves in Colorado’s 4th Congressional District. The reason is this—Angie Paccione and Marilyn Musgrave remain locked in a statistical dead heat, 45 to 42 percent, Paccione’s edge, with Eidsness capturing 6 percent of the vote*—stunning really when you consider that Musgrave and national Republicans have easily outspent Paccione and her allies by as much as eight-to-one at this point in the contest.
Is this possible? Sure. Is it likely? Who knows, really? You could make a decent argument either way.
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments