CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 29, 2012 12:19 AM UTC

"Not a Beer" Goes Below the Belt

  • 53 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

TUESDAY UPDATE: The big Denver newspaper chimes in with an editorial calling the ad “despicable” and saying that Coors should be “embarrassed.”

—–

Republican Joe “Not a Beer” Coors is up on TV with a new ad attacking Democratic Rep. Ed Perlmutter in their battle in CD-7. But this ad goes wayyyy over the line (more after the jump).

The “Mrs. Perlmutter” mentioned in the ad is Ed’s ex wife, Deana, who did indeed lobby for Solyndra. But Deana and Ed divorced in 2008, before Barack Obama was President and long before the 2009 stimulus bill passed by Congress that “Not a Beer” references in the ad. If this ad were true, Ed might be the first man in America to go out of his way to help his ex-wife make money.

Mind you, this is the same Joe Coors who believes that God speaks to him on the golf course and lists biblical prophecy as a hobby. But it doesn’t take prophetic vision to know that this ad was going to blow up in his face.

Oh, and remember back in August when Coors released numbers from an internal poll showing him with a ridiculous 9-point lead over Perlmutter? We said at the time that those numbers were nonsense, and that seems to be the case now. You don’t put up a muckraking bullshit ad like this on TV if you think you’re ahead in the polls.

Joe Coors: He’s “Not a Beer,” “Not All There“, and now, “Not Opposed to Flat-Out Lies.”

Comments

53 thoughts on ““Not a Beer” Goes Below the Belt

  1. Everything in that ad makes me want to puke.

    In addition to the lies spelled out in the diary, there was no scamming of taxpayers. If the Chinese hadn’t flooded the American market with PV panels, then Solyndra’s expensive but efficient tech would have been gangbusters. Yes, I work in renewables, it probably shows.

    But I don’t know that Joe Coors has even seen that ad. He’s so out of touch, I doubt he actually knows anything that’s going on.

        1. Is coming from the right wingnuts. Muslims. Gays. the Media. Rigged polls. Mexicans. When has a Republican actually accepted responsibility for anything of late?  Boehner’s House dysfunctional–it’s Harry Reid’s fault (so say the wingnuts).  

          But that’s irrelevant because Libby is just a troll.  

  2. I was feeling a little burned out this morning, wondering why I signed up to walk in a race that was won before Coors even announced. This reminded me that we don’t just need to beat Coors, we need to make sure that he (like most of Perlmutter’s past opponents) gets humiliated so hard he never shows his face to voters again.

    1. The bad news is if you watched it 3 times, you missed that it was $500 million (and the voice over said 1/2 Billion).  So you need to check your eyes too (you have my simpathy — my old eyes and ears aren’t so hot either).

      The good news is that you can also tell everyone the facts about this GOP talking point:

      It’s often claimed that the Solyndra loan guarantee was “rushed through” by the Obama Administration for political reasons. In fact, the Solyndra loan guarantee was a multi-year process that the Bush Administration launched in 2007.

      You’d never know from the media coverage that:

         The Bush team tried to conditionally approve the Solyndra loan just before President Obama took office.

         The company’s backers included private investors who had diverse political interests.

         The loan comprises just 1.3% of DOE’s overall loan portfolio. To date, Solyndra is the only loan that’s known to be troubled.

      That’s a track record any venture capitalist would envy.

  3. really ?

    you don’t know any ex-couples who treat each other amicably ?  

    or,

    in a more cynical interpretation,

    couldn’t that (going out of their way) help meet terms of a settlement ?  

          1. Ed might be the first man in America to go out of his way to help his ex-wife make money.

            Right there in plain sight, congressman helps wife-lobbyist cash checks by gifting taxpayer assets to wife-lobbyist’s specific and named client ….. client later goes bankrupt …. leaving the taxpayers screwed.

      1. Too much multi-tasking and too distracted to check carefully. But we know what we mean, right? And since we’re not ‘tad we don’t get teased mercilessly.  One more good thing about not being ‘tad.  

  4. the facts are correct,

    you just don’t like them ?  

    Ed DID vote; Deana DID make money.  

    The conclusion about scamming taxpayers is a little bit of artistic license, but we all support the arts, right ?  

    What makes this a brilliant ad is that it is impossible to refute in what little time is left.  

    Low info voters who watch a lot of TV are going to ask themselves,

    “If this isn’t true, why isn’t Ed going on TV to refute it ?”

    But of course refutation will require voters to comprehend subtleties like the sequence of events laid out here.

    Good luck with that.  

      1. He could stop this sooner rather than maybe stopping it later if he’d release some internal poll numbers.

        Why won’t he release polling …. even the internals to at least strike some fear into Dean Singleton in hopes that Dean doesn’t endorse Mr. Coors.

          1. Obviously your economic situation is impacted by Ed retaining his congressional seat.

            Are you inside the campaign, inside the congressional office or a lobbyist?

      2. She may be a lobbyist, but I would hardly call her a scum-sucking pig. Her three girls with Ed have always been the couple’s first priority after their divorce, just as they were during the marriage. I have a great deal of respect for their commitment to parenting after their divorce.

        1. ….I think there were people in Washington who were.

          I’m not a paranoid/conspiricist person by nature.  Yet, as I reviewed a lot of information a decade ago, there were too many inconsistencies in the official explanations.

          A few tips of the iceberg.

          1.  After decades of the several joint Chiefs of Staff being able to authorize a passenger plane shoot down, such authority went to the VP in June, 2001.

          2.  We were coincidentally in some kind of a military excercise on that day that had all of our military planes grounded.

          3.  Why were we able to launch a fighter plane in some minutes when that golfer’s bizjet lost communications over the middle of nowhere, but we couldn’t launch a plane on the busy east coast?

          4.  Puddles and pools of liquid steel at the site for days that could only be explained by thermite.

          5.  The amazingly rapid evacuation of steel and debris to be smelted in China and elsewhere.

          6.  That the two towers pancaked just like a demolition would, no variation, no tilting.  And the third building went down even though it was never struck.  

          7.  At the pentagon, no 757 (?) engines, passenger seats, or wings were ever found.  The impact footprint and the engine parts that were found were more in line with a long range missile like a Tomahawk.  

          8.  Amazing how fast the Patriot Act, which had been sitting on the shelf for years was suddenly the solution to prevent another debacle like this.

          These, and many other facts, are abhorrent to the American people.  And that is why the truth of 9/11 is shunted out of public discussion as “Impossible!”

          We all know how valid the Warren Commission’s findings were about the Kennedy Assassination.  Someday the truth about 9/11 will similarly out.

          And why, “My Pet Goat?”  Everyone knows that real Americans don’t raise goats, that’s something them Ay-rabs and Mooselims do along with their sheep.  Right?  🙂

          (Reality check:  Goats and sheep are much more frequent in Texas than one might think, considering the macho-ness of cattle.)

            1. There is none.  Now, I understand that one can’t prove a negative, but when a whole lot of very inexplicable events stack up, it’s called evidence.

              The only evidence to the contrary is, “I can’t believe Americans would do this!”

              If we are around so long, I’ll bet someday all this will be studied like the JFK assassination and lo and behold, a new truth!

    1. Really? When Perlmutter voted for the stimulus package, which makes no mention of Solyndra, in 2009, not only had he been divorced from Deanna Perlmutter the year before after about three years of separation, but by then Deana Perlmutter was no longer a lobbyist for the firm.  At least that’s what the article in Denver’s big daily said. So the whole thing is pure bull, Barron. I don’t have to like or dislike it because it doesn’t… you know…  exist.

      1. and because I don’t have the time to research this, it appears that you have laid any hint of wrongdoing to rest. I think Ed and his campaign need to orchestrate communication of this. I’ve always held Ed in very high regard and never had any reason to doubt his integrity.

        1. And I think more important is that Ms. Perlmutter was specifically hired for energy tax credits (when with Holland and Knight) and to take the loan through the energy administration process (with Dutko, http://soprweb.senate.gov/inde… ). Meaning that Coors would need proof that Rep. Perlmutter improperly contacted Bush administration officials about the loan for anything wrong to have happened.

          In other words, Ms. Perlmutter wasn’t lobbying the House on this matter in any capacity. Random stimulus side note or not.

          Not that it matters. Coors didn’t actually say that she did, he released a sleazy commercial that is made to make you assume that… Complete with a “Mrs.” that, in any circumstances, went out 40 years ago, a word that makes my 57 yo mom cringe. Ain’t election politics grand? Especially when done poorly, but nice and late.

          FTR, McBee handled the ARRA impact on solar for Solyndra. Lobbyist timeline here, http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2

        2. big Denver paper.  That’s what the article says.  So it’s really their reporting that’s at issue and droll appears to have been much less lazy than me and has done the extra research for us. So I think we can safely say… this is the way it really was.

  5. He’s just another clueless, classless old white guy who thought it would be fun to buy a congressional seat. Another hobby to go along with his singing duets with his old pal god.

    1. whoever came up with those not-a-beer ads is going to be stuck with at least some of the blame.

      I understand they wanted us all to know he’s not in the sloppy drunk beer sector of the family enterprises but in the completely wholesome, moral, squeaky clean ceramics division.  But they also didn’t want to be preachy. I get it but this wasn’t the way to do it.

      Didn’t they suspect something that close to I-am-not-a-witch was just asking for it?  The opportunities to pop in an endless stream of substitutes for the beer?  The way it’s as SNL ready as the witch ad or any Palin speech? What were they thinking? Or smoking?

  6. I got a real chuckle out of watching this ad, in which Coors talks about the “real world.” How’s did Armageddon arriving in the year 2000 work out in the “real world,” Mr. Conservative Candidate? Stay grounded, indeed.

    1. if he still thinks Armageddon is coming in the relatively near future. Those of us who think the world is probably going to be around for our children and grandchildren really shouldn’t trust a pol who can’t possibly be all that concerned about the future right here on earth in the material world if that pol doesn’t think there’s much future left. Why be concerned with the welfare of future generations if you don’t think there are going to be any?  A candidate being an end timer should definitely be a deal breaker for any voter who thinks there is a chance the world is going to continue for their progeny.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

104 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!