Ron Hanks steps up abortion attacks on Republican Senate rival Joe O’Dea

(“I’m sad today because Joe is choosing murder and death” — Republished by Colorado Pols)

Republican Senate candidates Ron Hanks and Joe O’Dea.

With just two weeks left before voters begin receiving their ballots, Colorado’s Republican U.S. Senate primary is heating up over the issue of abortion rights.

State Rep. Ron Hanks of Penrose, a far-right election conspiracist who secured the top ballot line on the June 28 primary with the highest vote share at the GOP state assembly last month, has attacked his opponent, Denver construction executive Joe O’Dea, as a “pro-abortion” candidate at odds with most Republican voters.

In an interview with conservative radio host Dan Caplis on Tuesday, O’Dea affirmed his opposition to the Supreme Court’s expected reversal of Roe v. Wade and said he’d support a limited effort to codify abortion rights nationwide through legislation in Congress.

“I would not vote for a bill that expands Roe, but yes, I would vote for a bill that protects a woman’s right to choose early in the pregnancy,” O’Dea said.

O’Dea said he supported a wide range of limits on abortion rights and access, including prohibitions on abortions later in pregnancy, preserving the ban on public funding for abortions and parental notification requirements.

But his support for a bill establishing a nationwide right to abortion puts him at odds with most GOP voters, 68% of whom oppose such a policy, according to a recent CNN poll. Hanks, whose campaign kept a low profile following his assembly win and raised little money, has gone on the offensive in recent days, slamming O’Dea’s abortion-rights stance.

“Joe O’Dea is now not only running as a pro-abortion candidate in a Republican primary, he’s siding with the radical Democrat lobby set on taking away states’ rights on the issue,” Hanks wrote in a May 20 post on his website.

Neither Hanks nor O’Dea responded to a request for comment. Democrats and abortion-rights advocates, for their part, say that both GOP candidates, who are vying for the nomination to challenge incumbent Sen. Michael Bennet in November, are out of step with Colorado voters. O’Dea has criticized both the Reproductive Health Equity Act passed by Colorado Democratic lawmakers this year and the unsuccessful abortion-protections bill proposed by congressional Democrats in the wake of a leaked draft Supreme Court opinion earlier this month that indicated the court’s conservative majority is poised to overturn the 49-year-old Roe v. Wade decision guaranteeing abortion rights.

“Ron Hanks and Joe O’Dea are enemies of abortion rights – and their anti-choice views go against the majority of Coloradans and disqualifies them from serving in the U.S. Senate,” Colorado Democratic Party spokesperson Nico Delgado said in a statement.

‘Somebody I cannot vote for’

Hanks challenged O’Dea directly on the issue in a debate in Denver on Saturday, drawing cheers from the crowd at the Grizzly Rose concert hall as he called his opponent’s stance “the same as the unrepentant pro-abortion Nancy Pelosi.”

“I’m personally pro-life, but I also know that we need balance in America,” O’Dea replied. “And that’s where I’m at.”

Hanks — a first-term lawmaker who has repeatedly spread debunked conspiracy theories about the 2020 election and was present outside the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 insurrection — was one of just four House GOP members to sponsor a 2022 bill “abolishing abortion in Colorado,” with no exceptions for rape, incest or life-threatening complications like ectopic pregnancies.

Colorado voters have soundly rejected a series of attempts by conservative activists to limit abortion rights at the state level over the last decade. The most recent, Proposition 115 in 2020, would have banned abortions after 22 weeks of pregnancy — roughly the same limit endorsed by O’Dea in his interview with Caplis this week — and suffered an 18-point defeat.

In order to replace Bennet this year, we need to unite a huge coalition … It’s going to take a lot of the far right, it’s going to take Trump Republicans, it’s going to take independents, it’s going to take disenfranchised Democrats.

– U.S. Senate candidate Joe O’Dea

Abortion-rights advocates say that abortions later in pregnancy, which account for less than 1% of procedures, are highly personal and complicated decisions that often follow the diagnosis of a terminal genetic or developmental condition in the fetus. Though the phrase “late-term abortion” is favored by conservative politicians, medical professionals reject the term, which they say “has no medical definition” and is used misleadingly and inconsistently.

Under pressure from Caplis, O’Dea declined to say when he believes human life begins, and said he wasn’t open to reconsidering his position. Repeatedly pivoting to concerns about inflation and gas prices rather than what he called “social issues,” he argued that his stance represents the Republican Party’s best shot at unseating Bennet in a state that has trended towards Democrats in recent elections.

“In order to replace Bennet this year, we need to unite a huge coalition,” O’Dea said. “It’s going to take a lot of the far right, it’s going to take Trump Republicans, it’s going to take independents, it’s going to take disenfranchised Democrats. And I’m about bringing that unity together on the issues that are important to working Americans.”

O’Dea and his backers — who include much of the state’s Republican establishment — hope that kind of strategic message will be persuasive to GOP primary voters next month. But it didn’t persuade Caplis, or multiple listeners who called into his show to express their disappointment with O’Dea after the interview Tuesday afternoon — including Hanks himself.

“I’m grateful for the chance to build this distinction here. It’s important for the voters of Colorado,” Hanks told Caplis.

“I’m sad today because Joe is choosing murder and death,” Caplis said later in his show. “It just makes me very sad, because somebody I had viewed as a very strong and credible GOP candidate is now somebody I cannot vote for.

“As awful as it would be, we can afford to lose a Senate seat in Colorado again,” he added. “What we cannot afford to lose is what it means to be pro-life. What we cannot afford to lose is the GOP identity as the pro-life party, because we might pick off a Senate seat somewhere.”

Colorado Newsline is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Colorado Newsline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Quentin Young for questions: Follow Colorado Newsline on Facebook and Twitter.

6 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. Colorado Pols says:

    Colorado Newsline is proving to be an excellent addition to Colorado's media landscape and we encourage readers to support their work.

    Note to Colorado Newsline: the buttons coded into the HTML used to republish stories linking to your donation pages do not appear to work, and that is why we omitted them.

  2. kwtree says:

    In 2010, Hanks had a more moderate view on abortion:

    In the 2010 survey, Hanks wrote: "I am pro-life, but I will hold open a measured and narrow window for medical experts — I am not one — to provide expertise and guidance in specific situations. We should not consider abortion a form of birth control without consequences, nor advocate it as such to our children. We must promote adoption, and remove the shame from carrying a child to term. No federal funding, and this issue would be better addressed by the individual states." No change, he wrote Monday.

    • JohnInDenver says:

      I keep wondering about Republican candidates view of the world: 

       * if abortion ought not be birth control, can states decide what other forms of "birth control" are allowable?

       * do they really think that "shame" is a major factor in a woman's decision to get or not get an abortion?

       * do they really think most women would be willing to carry to birth and then have their child adopted?

       * are they willing to provide pre- and post-natal care for the mother, and universal medical coverage for children?

       * why are individual states be better suited to make decisions about (from their perspective) life and death?

       * do those states have the right to determine what their residents can do when they travel to other states?

    • Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS says:

      "remove the shame from carrying a child to term"

      I thought slut shaming is an important tenet in contemporary Republican theology.

  3. The realist says:

    Chase, Chase, Chase – Hanks has been in office for two legislative sessions and we still don't know that he lives in Canon City not Penrose?! Unless of course he lives inside a Post Office Box . . .  

  4. Conserv. Head Banger says:

    Ron Hanks wants religious police in citizens' bedrooms.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account

You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.