CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 12, 2010 07:06 PM UTC

Space Invaders, Inc.

  • 3 Comments
  • by: JO

Via Krugman, from British sci-fi writer Charles Stross: corporations are alien creatures living among us and enslaving and/or governing human beings:

We are now living in a global state that has been structured for the benefit of non-human entities with non-human goals. They have enormous media reach, which they use to distract attention from threats to their own survival. They also have an enormous ability to support litigation against public participation, except in the very limited circumstances where such action is forbidden. Individual atomized humans are thus either co-opted by these entities (you can live very nicely as a CEO or a politician, as long as you don’t bite the feeding hand) or steamrollered if they try to resist.

Full piece at http://www.antipope.org/charli…

[Pressed for time? Suggest reading Stross instead of the JO that follows.]

As we know, these creatures were recognized as, well, as creatures with constitutional rights by the Supreme Court in January 2010 (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. 08-205). Pending: Do corporations have rights to “personal” privacy? (FCC v. AT&T)

And for the benefit of the Near Horizoners: to what extent do corporations domiciled in New York or Silicon Valley determine the policies of the government of the State of Colorado, or municipalities in the state, all eager for new opportunities to work for that corporation in exchange for some bit corporate manna hereabouts?

Krugman ( http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c… ) would have it that corporations are not alien creatures because they are controlled by individual human beings at the helm.

But are the CEOs at the helm? Could they shift course–say, at the expense of the corporation for the benefit of the broader population of humans–of their own free will? Or is the manna of these alien creatures so addictive that their top servants–and not just top servants, either; consider the large number of gray flannel suits coming to the polls every 24 months or so–are compelled to continue to do their bidding, at the expense of everyone else, including at the expense of their own servants who may be cast off randomly to keep the INCreatures growing.

Comments

3 thoughts on “Space Invaders, Inc.

  1. to my friends at the “Bagel Street Irregulars” when this topic arose during our discussion one day:

    The problem with corporate hegemony is the absence of humanity from the actual decision making process.

    We were sitting around a table…about twenty of us…and I presented two scenarios. First…imagine we are twenty members of the Board of Directors of “Megabucks Corp.”. We have 75,000 employees, worldwide, in 145 locations. We are from several countries and see each other two or three times a year. A line on a report brings us the news that we must fire 5 workers. What are the odds that a single one of us will give it a second thought?

    Now picture yourself sitting around a table with 19 other people who comprise the owner, management, and staff of a small business. You will know them all…their families…their dreams. When the reluctant owner says, “I have to let five of you go”…will you think of anything beyond the bottom line or the dividend owed to each shareholder at quarters end?

    Of course, you will.

    Certainly there are exceptions, but anyone who does not believe that profit, and profit alone, drives the corporate world is a sadly naive fool.

    It is, perhaps, a primary reason why I don’t get the Tea Parties’ slavish devotion to the Corporatist Party. They are the food upon which the beast feeds, and yet they can’t see beyond their own moral judgements to discover the truth.

     

    1. To what extent are corporate decisions driven by published expectations of the next profit and loss statement? Not just a profit, but 34 cents a share, up from 29 cents the previous quarter, is not enough if the published speculation was 38 cents. I’ve written the leads myself: “MegaBucks fell short of expectations in the fifth quarter, reporting 34 cents a share, short of the consensus expectation of 38 cents. MegaBucks shares fell $2.00 on the news.”

      I suspect the directors you mention might reply by pointing to the pension funds invested in the corporation that depend on such expectations, in a never-ending cycle of need begets greed begets need begets greed. Or is the other way ’round?

      Nor is this limited to MegaBucks, Inc. itself. How many smaller enterprises (“Inclings”) are devoted to serving the needs of MegaBucks, ranging from manufacturing the seatbelts that go into MegaBucks cars to running the diner where employees of MegaBucks buy lunch (metaphorically speaking).

      There are other models, of course, as Stross pointed out.

      How does it come that these questions are not of interest or discussed widely?

  2. Could they shift course–say, at the expense of the corporation for the benefit of the broader population of humans–of their own free will?

    Not without facing a Shareholder’s derivative suit.  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

222 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!