President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*


CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*


CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Anna Stout





CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Jerry Sonnenberg

(R) Richard Holtorf

(R) Heidi Ganahl

(R) Deborah Flora





CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Doug Lamborn*


CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*


CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen


CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Scott James




State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 25, 2010 9:48 pm

Live From New York...It's Ken Buck!

  • by: Colorado Pols

It’s not every day that a Colorado politician makes it onto “Saturday Night Live.” Any Polsters out there remember the last time a Colorado politico was on SNL?

The joke is in reference to Buck’s disastrous appearance on “Meet the Press” a week ago. We’d say it’s a pretty good bet that you’ve said something seriously significant (alliteration rules!) once your statement crosses over into mainstream popular culture.  


46 thoughts on “Live From New York…It’s Ken Buck!

    1. How is this not at least noteworthy?

      But if you really need more of an explanation, this is pretty strong evidence of just how damaging Buck’s statement has become. When something you say or do crosses over into popular culture, then you know there is a serious impact.

      1.  re: “When something you say or do crosses over into popular culture, then you know there is a serious impact.” Does it? What is the impact in this case–the SNL clip, I’m referring to?

        The only evidence I could point to on this subject is the hundreds of posts on this site re not voting for either candidate on grounds of Obama’s actions on DADT.

        Is there some convincing evidence that social issues are going to determine the outcome of the CO Senate contest in 2010–evidence besides some parties’ wishful thinking?

        1. to what do you attribute Buck’s falling numbers in the polls? I think it’s the social issues, though probably the “buyer’s remorse” comments more than what he said on MTP.

              1. …a large flock of voters stampeded straight out of the service area, calling results of its “our-poll-includes-young-‘uns-with-cell-polls” survey into question. The stampeders evidently were among the millions — no, tens of millions — who skipped Saturday Night Live in order to be sure not to miss even second of Meet the Press, not in order to find out whether Buckaroo/BoyBennet have any substantial ideas to address the economic morass –who cares? –but to find out: “What does Ken Buck (laugh track here) think about…” ‘Cause if you don’t ask, he won’t tell.

        2. as a volunteer, JO. Social issues are pushing Dem and Unaffiliated women into Bennet’s camp in droves and the numbers prove it in polls.

          This is funny. Okay? If you don’t get it, maybe you’re just too darn old to be watching SNL. Go work some GOTV and make a difference, for a change.  

          1. “This is funny,” okay, but no one wants to explain it. I am wondering why. Could there be some sexual innuendo here?

            Sort of reminds me of a famous photo of a march in Memphis, 1968 (striking sanitation workers, the reason MLK was in Memphis that infamous day and year) of a marcher carrying a sign: I Am A Man.

            A man just like you, who deserves to be treated in the same way by the law. We can all understand that. We can all sympathize with that. Some of are inclined to step off the curb and join that man.

            OTOH, I’ve watched Gay Pride marches in NYC and SF. Gotta say, I didn’t get the impression that the emphasis was: “We are people just like you.”

            Mixing sex and politics is a bit of a tricky thing. I am wondering how inside jokes (if that’s what was on SNL) plays into this. As for being on National TeeVee, gee whiz lookee here Ma, I admit it doesn’t do much for me.

            As for being too old to watch SNL,  possibly so, but luckily, I’m able to see reruns of Ozzie and Harriet when I’m taking a break from studying the Constitution (O Revered Document That We Love).

            1. I was assuming that you weren’t serious since this is a pretty easy joke to figure out. Again, if you really don’t get it, it might just be a bit too young of a show for you.

              And I am not Man. I am woman.  

              1. “A man just like you.”

                No, not “you, Middle of the Road.” Just like “you white folks watching on TeeVee in 1968.” I would be very surprised indeed to learn that the marchers in Memphis, many of whom carried the same sign, were thinking about “you” Middle of the Road, or that “I Am Man” had any sexual implication whatsoever.

                But this is my point: equal rights under law for all citizens, yes. But, politically, I have to wonder whether it’s a good idea to mix in sexuality. My reason for mentioning Gay Pride marches. Who am I to say?

                But, I observe, in passing, that the “joke” has still not been explained. Afraid of violating the new rules, perhaps.

                1. After all, it’s what you excel at.

                  And the reason no one is explaining it to you is because most thinking people would assume you aren’t this fucking stupid. Most of us would apparently be wrong.  

                  1. “this fucking stupid,” brought to you courtesy of Goggle, Ink. See, it’s programmed in. Can’t help it; from code to post in milliseconds. Works real good, don’t it.

                    Actually, I don’t think that’s the reason no one is explaining it. Which was my point exactly. My joke. Get it?


          “Most scientists today agree that sexual orientation is most likely the result of a complex interaction of environmental, cognitive and biological factors. In most people, sexual orientation is shaped at an early age. There is also considerable recent evidence to suggest that biology, including genetic or inborn hormonal factors, play a significant role in a person’s sexuality.”

          Ol’ Bucky would be a part of popular culture in the Mad Men era.  Fortunately, the rest of us have evolved since then.  I’m frankly surprised he didn’t call the moderator Joan at the debate the other night.

    1. Pretty sure Schroeder made SNL when she cried while giving up her presidential campaign.

      Since then, though, we’ve sent such a parade of political midgets to Washington that there hasn’t been any Colorado pol important enough to be worth lampooning.

    1. David Chestnut is a far, far gayer name than Ken Buck.

      Still, I can easily see both of these nom-de-plumes in black leather ass-chaps enjoying pink mai-tais together on any given Saturday evening.

      Let’s see, what do . . . BJ? . . . David Chestnut? . . . and Ken Buck all seem to have in common?  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

71 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!