CO-04 (Special Election)
See Full Big Line
(R) Greg Lopez
(R) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Biden*
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
90%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
90%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
(R) Ron Hanks
40%
30%
20%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(R) Deborah Flora
(R) J. Sonnenberg
30%↑
15%↑
10%↓
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Dave Williams
(R) Jeff Crank
50%↓
50%↑
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
90%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) Brittany Pettersen
85%↑
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
(R) Janak Joshi
60%↑
35%↓
30%↑
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 07, 2010 02:33 PM UTC
22 Comments
DCCC has NOT “pulled out,” they adjusted their buy to account for, among other things, $300,000 of ad buys by Emily’s List. Emily’s List does not throw good money after bad. Not a single news outlet has reported that the DCCC has “pulled out,” because that would be bullshit.
H-man, why are all of your arguments dependent on bullshit?
Not a single news outlet has reported that the DCCC….
Only liberals believe that the mainstream media accurately reports the news. If you are waiting for Washpo, ABC, NBC, CBS, or MSNBC to report anything perceived to be damaging to the liberal cause you need to stock up on food and water….it will be a long wait.
If his headline were true, then according to his own post the headline could be: NRCC pulls out of CD-4.
DCCC adjusts thier buy in CD-3 to spend no money in the week before the election?
JCB it must really suck to be a Dem in this cycle. But, your anger is misdirected. Take a look at what the clowns you sent back to DC have done in the last two years and you might begin to understand. Then again, maybe you will not.
When called on your factless bullshit, you revert to factless blustery bullshit. Once again, you’re not offering anything new.
CD4 voter registration figures from the Secretary of State presents a reliable starting point for predicting CD4 results.
Registered Reps 136888 40%
Unafils 110896 32%
Registered Dems 97448 28%
Factor in the mood of the voter enthusiasm of Reps besting Dems magnifies the effect of the registration figures.
For good measure one could factor in the “blue collar” sentiment recently polling in favor of the Reps canidates. Doing so certainly paints an insurmountable handicap for Markey.
Markey winning the seat in 2008 was the first time Reps had not held that seat since 1972. The argument could be made that Markey was the beneficiary of distaste for McCain and an energized Dem base coming out for Obama. Further Musgrave’s campaign was perceived as very negative and resulted in the perfect storm.
All this to consider and Coloradopols still lists Markey as favored to win. I would like to hear Coloradopols justification. I recognize that will be just as likely to occur as a day without a Buck bashing diary does not make the front page.
You are in fantasy land. McCain decisively won the 4th, as did Betsy Markey. Betsy Markey did not win because of “distaste for McCain.” She won because of distaste for Marilyn Musgrave and a combined GOP/Dem/Unaffilliated excitement to vote for Betsy Markey.
Let them enjoy their circle jerk. It’s better than coffee in the morning.
Any more than it is okay to write completely false diaries. We changed your headline from “DCCC Pulls Out of CD-4,” because it’s false.
You’re killing me Pols, you’re killing me. You do it everyday.
Okay, BJ, give us an example? Where have we recently written a headline that is patently untrue?
This isn’t about semantics. This is about true vs. untrue. It is untrue to say that the DCCC is “pulling out” of CD-4. There’s no argument to be made otherwise. What if the headline was “RNCC pulling out of CD-4”? That wouldn’t be true, either, and we wouldn’t permit it.
LOL. Now they are editing headlines they feel are too damaging to their progressive canidates. I would expect nothing less from the propaganda arm of the Democrats. Too Funny! Change Pulls to Cuts. This is sophmoric and amateurish. But then again it is from Coloradopols. At least this site provides a continual dose of humor.
We’ve done this on occasion, on headlines written about Democrats and Republicans. You can’t just flat-out post a false statement in a headline any more than we would let you post a completely untrue diary. This diary is okay, but the prior headline — that the DCCC is “pulling out” of CD-4 — was false. And it’s not just a minor thing. It would be a huge story if the DCCC was really pulling out of CD-4 entirely.
Here is a headline you promoted:
“Ken Buck Ad Campaign Propped Up By Foreign Cash? ”
The ad campaign which is the subject of the title is a Chamber of Commerce ad campaign, not Ken Buck’s Campaign as the title implies.
Are you going to change that title which is false?
If you feel the answer is “no” then post it and shut up.
We don’t think the headline “Ken Buck Ad Campaign Propped Up By Foreign Cash?” is untrue, but we can understand the argument against it. The headline has been changed to “Anti-Bennet Ad Campaign Propped Up By Foreign Cash?”
You think Pols has only edited (or even deleted) the diaries of people with whom they disagree or who come here to shill for a particular candidate?
The Buck shills on this site are beyond delusional. Ken Buck may win, but it will be in spite of your actions, not because of them.
Gardner is endorsed by the DP.
http://www.denverpost.com/opin…