Happening: A Bipartisan End To The Death Penalty

Lethal injection chamber.

Denver7’s Blair Miller reports:

Colorado lawmakers on Tuesday introduced their much-anticipated bill to repeal the state’s death penalty – the sixth time such a bill has been introduced in recent years.

SB20-100 , if passed as introduced , would take the death penalty off the table as an option for prosecutors when they take a class 1 felony case to trial – but that would only apply to suspected criminals charged by prosecutors after July 1, 2020…

…[T]his year’s measure also has Republican sponsors and cosponsors, which could help push it over the edge in the Senate, where Democrats hold a 19-16 majority but are expected to see one senator go on maternity leave soon and another seat have to be filled in the wake of the retirement of Sen. Lois Court. The measure is almost certain to pass the Democrat-heavy House.

Democrats looking to repeal Colorado’s death penalty have long had a friend in Sen. Kevin Priola, a Catholic whose opposition to the death penalty for years was the lone exception to a wall of Republican support. This year, two additional Republicans, Sens. Jack Tate and Owen Hill, have padded the margin needed to get the bill out of the Senate and on to Gov. Jared Polis’ waiting desk.

Previous attempts to legislative repeal the capital punishment in Colorado have failed for different reasons. In 2013, an historic progressive legislative session encountered fierce Republican backlash which ultimately led to recalls against Democratic Senators, and at least partly because Democrats had achieved so much that year, it was determined politically necessary to hold off. In 2019, the dissent of one Democrat, Sen. Rhonda Fields of Aurora, resulted in a standoff in the upper chamber that ended when sponsors pulled the bill late in the session.

Although repeal of the death penalty for future cases seems assured this year with this new infusion of bipartisan support, a word of respect for Sen. Fields is called for as this long struggle heads for its inevitable conclusion. Two the three men currently on death row in this state are there for the murder of Sen. Fields’ son in 2005. We of course have not been party to every discussion about this legislation, but it’s been suggested that Sen. Fields has been treated insensitively by some of her colleagues over the years for her difference of opinion on the issue–a difference that no one can fault Sen. Fields for having after her own tragic experience.

The decline of capital punishment is nevertheless a global trend, and increasingly the choice of Americans in recent years as the cost, process, and stigma of judicially sanctioned killing has combined to make it basically unworkable. Colorado’s move to end capital punishment is mostly symbolic given the extreme rarity of its application, but it’s also consistent with the growing consensus that it’s not appropriate as a society to kill people.

And it looks like 2020 is the year it’s going to happen.

1 Shares

11 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. ModeratusModeratus says:

    The people of Colorado restored the death penalty by a public vote in 1974.

    If the legislature repeals the death penalty without a vote of the people, it's tyranny plain and simple.

  2. Genghis says:

    Here's hoping it happens. It'd be nice to have Colorado join the civilized world in this regard.

  3. JohnInDenverJohnInDenver says:

    Given the basis for Sen. Rhonda Fields’ position, the legislature could take a slightly more nuanced approach, saying no death penalty for any crimes EXCEPT for murder to influence a trial or for those in a penitentiary.

    Pragmatically, those facing conviction or those already with a life sentence without parole (or its equivalent, such as consecutive sentences adding up to 200 years) have little or nothing to lose.  If they are not rehabilitating but are escalating their violence against witnesses, guards, or law enforcement, something needs to be done to avoid on-going violence. 

    • PseudonymousPseudonymous says:

      The motivation for the folks moving this bill is that the state not kill people.  Still killing people, even if it’s strategically, doesn’t meet that desire.

      Also, is the basis for Senator Fields’ position that her son was killed because he was a witness, which seems to be the premise of your statement, or that she wants to see the murderers of her son executed? I don’t presume to know, but I hadn’t heard that particular nuance from her.

  4. ohwilleke says:

    The process of filling vacancies in the Colorado General Assembly, which I have participated in as a vacancy committee member at least twice, is fast and preserves the partisan balance. Maternity leave and departures for health reasons are non-issues.

  5. allyncooper says:

    The availability of the death penalty does nothing to deter murder. Studies have shown it is disproportionately applied conditioned on race, economic status, and quality of legal counsel. The dictum of "justice delayed is justice denied' is inoperative when endless appeals and stays retain those sentenced on death row for decades, not to mention the legal expense to the taxpayer.

    And as a libertarian, I fear the power of a state that claims the legal right to kill its own citizens.

     

     

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.