Colorado Pols
U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Mark Baisley

90%↑

10%

(D) Phil Weiser

(R) Victor Marx

(R) Barb Kirkmeyer
90%↑

20%

15%
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(R) Michael Allen

70%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) James Wiley
90%

10%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

80%↑

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Melat Kiros

(R) Christy Peterson

95%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Dwayne Romero

60%↓

40%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

80%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

53%↓

48%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Jason Clark

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) A. Capobianco

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Manny Rutinel

(R) Gabe Evans*

55%↑

45%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

[wpdreams_ajaxsearchlite]
July 20, 2010 11:04 PM UTC

Romanoff Goes Negative Against Bennet

Democrat Andrew Romanoff has officially crossed over into negative campaigning with his newest TV ad. The ad bashes Sen. Michael Bennet for taking money from banking and oil interests while trying to make the point that he has been corrupted by big money influences.

Romanoff has said for months that he was going to keep his campaign about issues and wouldn’t go negative against Bennet — a position we always thought was silly to take, given that there’s no way Romanoff was going to beat Bennet without going negative. But Romanoff does not have enough money for a significant TV buy; this ad may damage Bennet, but not enough so that Romanoff can ultimately overtake him in the primary.

The end result is that Romanoff looks more than a bit hypocritical in now going negative, but won’t likely gain enough of a foothold for it to be worth the strategic change. Romanoff is basically just throwing rocks at a windowless building at this point.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about Donald Trump

Posts about Rep. Gabe Evans

Posts about Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about the Colorado House

Posts about the Colorado Senate


100 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!