Immunity for grand jury testimony
Anti-tax activist and former prosecutor Douglas Bruce today agreed to testify before a grand jury after the District Attorney’s office granted him immunity.The agreement comes after Bruce’s initial appearance before the grand jury Wednesday night ended in an impasse that resulted in prosecutors again asking that he be held in contempt of court.
But in a last minute compromise, Bruce agreed to answer questions before the grand jury on Tuesday after 4th Judicial District Attorney Dan May agreed that nothing Bruce has to say will be used against him in a criminal proceeding.
May previously had stated that Bruce was not the target of the investigation, but rather a witness. May also said the grand jury case had nothing to do with Bruce’s political activities.
The agreement – reached in a private 30-minute meeting between May and Bruce this morning – resulted in prosecutors withdrawing a request that Bruce be held in contempt of court for his actions during his initial appearance before the grand jury, which took less than an hour.Grand jury proceedings are secret, so exactly what happened is not known. However, going into the courthouse Wednesday night, Bruce said he would balk at taking a grand jury oath swearing him to secrecy on the grounds that it infringed on his First Amendment right to free speech.
“Mr. Bruce and I had a chance to talk,” May said. “We’ve been able to discuss everything.”
Samelson – who intervened by telephone Wednesday night – said he was willing to allow the District Attorney to withdraw the contempt proceeding.
“Nothing you say in front of the grand jury can be used against you,” Samelson said. “Nothing derived from the grand jury can be used against you.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: fow eyy
IN: No Odor in the Pod (feat. Christy Powell)
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: ParkHill
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Even More Felony Charges For Colorado Coup Plotters Jenna Ellis, John Eastman
BY: Colorado Pols
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Even stuff he isn’t asked. And in return will once again game the system.
Do you think he should not admit anything?
And just what is this about? He is a witness, not a person of interest, and it has nothing to do with his political activities.
Face it, you just don’t like the guy because he uses the system to allow Colorado voters the opportunity to vote to limit government power, and a majority of votes have in the past and may in the future so vote.
What else has he done ?
In this case, it’s a Grand Jury. We don’t now and may never know anything about it.