Of course it’s the “wrong formula” . . . 

. . . I can’t begin to imagine any “formula” for long-term, macro-budgeting that
wouldn’t be a “wrong formula.”  (Hell, even a “better formula” can still be a “bad formula” compared to a “terrible formula.”)   Always try to make things in GOPworld a little less terrible, huh? . . .

What an honest economist should say (and, that just about pretty much now rules out every self-declared “conservative” economist.  I mean, anyone who willingly calls themselves a “conservative economist” signals that facts and honesty just aren’t really all that important; that the dishonest adherence to, and the support of, a flawed ideology is what really matters.), that Tabor is really a “bad formula.”  In some circumstances, at way too many times, it’s a “terrible formula.”  Couple that with some of it’s even nuttier features — the infamous racheting — and it can at times even become the “worst possible” formula. 

God spare us from the tiny Dunning-Kruger minds of men who don’t really know, but somehow yet manage to think they have struck upon the ingenious and only “answer” to a complicated problem.  So, they create and construct rigid “formulas” to aid and guide, but really most importantly to justify, their small-minded stupidity and their pre-determined agendas . . . (I guess guys like this must fee they gotta’ compensate their other rigidity issues.)

Here’s a formula for July 2019, 27 years on — fuck Doug Bruce! Every thought he’s ever had, everything he stands for!  

(Let’s use the nasty-bits of a certain laffable, yammaginary Medal of Freedumb recipient? Hell, toss brownbacksam into the scrum, make it an idiot’s threesome . . .)