GOP CU Prez Finalist Blows Basic Diversity Question

UPDATE: Gov. Jared Polis weighs in, and while he doesn’t name Mark Kennedy specifically the message is clear:


Former Rep. Mark Kennedy (R).

As the Denver Post’s Elizabeth Hernandez reports, an interview at Colorado Public Radio with the controversial sole finalist to be the next President of the University of Colorado, former GOP Rep. Mark Kennedy, took a turn for the embarrassing when he flubbed a basic and essential question about the role of affirmative action in university admissions:

Host Ryan Warner referenced the U.S. Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights requiring Texas Tech University’s medical school to stop considering race in admissions. Warner asked Kennedy what his thoughts were, in general, on affirmative action in Colorado college admissions.

Kennedy stumbled.

“I have not wrestled with that at a university yet, in that restrictions have not been as — let me go back,” Kennedy told Warner. “Can I just not answer that question?” [Pols emphasis]

No, as the sole finalist for President of the state’s flagship public university, you have to answer that question.

So Mark Kennedy did. And it was not a good answer:

Kennedy told Warner the question caught him off guard and followed up with: “I think however we do admissions, it has to be done in a way to recognize that diversity provides a benefit to all and there are many ways of doing that.”

While it’s true that diversity among student bodies is beneficial to everyone, affirmative action is most certainly and foremost meant to benefit the minority groups who have been historically underrepresented in higher education. To inartfully dance around this central fact, especially after trying to avoid the question entirely, is problematic to say the least–you might call it the college admissions equivalent of “all lives matter.”

Kennedy later told the Post that the reason for these troubling answers to a very straightforward question were the result of him worrying about being late to his next appointment, and “clarified” that affirmative action should result in neither “undue benefit or undue penalty.” Unfortunately that clarification doesn’t clarify much of anything–and honestly sounds more like a swipe against what affirmative action is, you know, all about.

Fair to say that if you’re one of the CU students protesting your new “sole finalist,” your concerns were not allayed.


3 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. spaceman65 says:

    "Can I just not answer that question?"  Sure.  Go ahead.  It's just what we're looking for in a University president.  Congrats, Board of Regents, you really outdid yourselves here.

  2. Budded says:

    So CU will become Trump University, converting Colorado's richest, most privileged kids into little GOPers. Neat.

  3. JohnInDenverJohnInDenver says:

    Learning about the specific vote on whether to hire this candidate or not ought to be interesting.  The Regents have 5 Republicans, 4 Democrats — I'm sorta hoping it won't be a directly partisan decision.

    The larger question in my mind is whether any President is going to be able to work with the legislature and governor to provide additional resources for the Colorado University system and other higher education institutions. CPR did a story in May of 2018:

    In 2000, Colorado taxpayers footed 68 percent of the costs of a college degree, with students chipping in about one-third.

    Two decades and two recessions later, that ratio has nearly flipped as state funding has been cut and tuition has steadily risen to replace it….

    Following the Great Recession, tuition in Colorado jumped 44 percent, while the typical household’s income increased just 18 percent, according to state budget analysts. Meanwhile, state spending dropped 15 percent annually from 2008 to 2012, and has made only minimal gains since then.

    For the CU Boulder Campus in 2018-19, current budget income proportions are about Student tuition 47%, Govt. Grants/Contracts 20%, Private Grants/Contracts 10%, Auxillary Operating 14%, Indirect Cost reimbursement 5%, Direct State payment, 4.5%.  In short, CU-Boulder is running on past investment and less than 5% of its operating budget coming from the state. 


Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account

You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.