President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
December 05, 2009 09:41 PM UTC
21 Comments
these former Obama organizers joining Romanoff seems to indicate that they don’t believe this idea from this site:
Maybe time to change that statement in the big line?
That’s a huge reach–it could just as easily be read to mean that his campaign IS such a disaster that they figure they can’t hurt . . . and it will keep them employed. Cynical? Sure. Accurate? Quite possibly.
i guess Craig Hughes was just some schmuck looking for work?
be a bit more objective, instead of an AR apologist, you’d see what an utter disaster his campaign was and remains. You CAN see that, right?
you believe that.
And if, if, it remains a disaster, why is redstatesblues frontpaged with a diary called
“the Resurgence of Andrew Romanoff?”
based on what I thought was a good diary by RSB. As to whether Andrew is ‘coming back’ or–if as dukeco says–he never left, well on that I think the jury is still out.
I look forward to a good debate this Primary season, but I think AR has his work cut out for him if he wants to make it to the General.
I think the back and forth between the true believers on both sides–Bennet is nothing but a well-heeled Wall Street waterboy and AR is a sunken ship–are probably a bit hyperbolic.
to see it – thanks for increasing the dialogue. One thing is for sure, this will not be a boring mid-term election season.
but I need AR to convince me if I am to vote against an incumbent that I think generally is doing a good job.
For that I am looking for two things–1) that AR distinguish himself as better on the host of issues I care about, and 2) that he can win the General, which I do think comes down in large part (not entirely) to fund raising. I too support public financing, but absent that he needs to show he is serious about raising the $15MM or so it will take to win.
RE: the environment and public lands issues, I know Susan Daggett personally, have worked with her quite a bit, and think Sen. Bennet is generally good on these issues. His environmental staff is top notch too.
Still, as dukeco stated, I look forward to a good debate on issues and I think either man would represent me well in Washington.
In his HD6 “races?”
show Romanoff raised $247,551.27 total for his House races, including $91,736.55 for the most recent cycle (the 2006 race).
Since 2000, he received six contributions of $1,000 or more:
in 2002, his committee got $1,000 each from the D.C.-based I.B.E.W-C.O.P.E. and DASH-PAC, also D.C.-based.
in 2004, he got $2,000 from COLORADO PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS Small Donor Committee.
in 2006, he got $1,000 from the D.C.-based AFSCME SDC, $1,800 from COPIC (a small donor committee that gave equally to Democrats and Republican incumbents) and $2,000 from the REALTOR SMALL DONOR COMMITTEE
Point being that I don’t think AR is quite the fundraiser that some people seem to think he is, and his mediocre fundraising reports to date support that.
I was sad to see you didn’t comment on it. I’m glad you liked it though.
Regarding hyperbole: couldn’t agree more. My diary was an attempt to rise above it.
And BTW- Who? What?
No one cares about the old guy behind the curtain unless the campaign is hiding something.
…to believe so easily (not that Bennet did; I’m referring to some of his local rooters) that an experienced and capable politician like Andrew Romanoff would, or did, lay down while Bus Bennet rolled over him. OR to believe that an experienced politician and speaker like Romanoff was no match for Mr. Inside.
I refuse to admit that I’m citing
GWBbut there is something to the notion of praying for enemies who underestimate you. And here suddenly, after just one AR appearance, the debate springs to life! VrrroooommmmmIf anyone has underestimated a candidate in this primary- look in the mirror.
but it’s ok- underestimate Bennet all you want. Don’t cost nothin’.
It is wise of Speaker Romanoff to pay fo good people, however.
Or was that our discussion?
is that he got a campaign manager that is competent. He should have done that from the start. I suppose that shows delayed good judgment.