As the Denver Post reports, incumbent Congressman Doug Lamborn (R-Colorado Springs) is about to get retired:
Six-term U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn of Colorado Springs should not be on the Republican primary ballot this year, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled Monday.
The ruling finds in favor of a lawsuit that contended Lamborn didn’t properly petition his way onto the ballot…
…A lower court earlier this month largely sided with Lamborn that he had enough signatures to be on the ballot, but the opposition appealed, leading to the Colorado Supreme Court ruling.
The Supreme Court ruled a circulator for Lamborn’s campaign did not meet the state’s residency test and the signatures he collected from voters are “invalid and may not be considered.” Without the signatures, Lamborn fell short of the 1,000 needed to make the ballot, the court ruled.
This is a surprising turn of events for Lamborn, if only because recent history has shown that Colorado courts tend to rule on the side of ballot access in disputes over petition signatures. We would imagine that Lamborn’s campaign will do whatever it can to appeal this decision, but he may be out of luck. Marshall Zelinger of 9News happened to catch this reaction from state Sen. Owen Hill, one of two Republican candidates challenging for Lamborn’s seat:
As news came out that the State Supreme Court ruled @RepDLamborn signatures were collected by out of state petitioner, thus knocking him OFF the ballot, I was in the same committee room as @owenjhill, who is running for that Congressional seat. #copolitics #coleg pic.twitter.com/q7xDE9N6Z1
— Marshall Zelinger (@Marshall9News) April 23, 2018
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Colorado GOP Peeing Its Collective Pants Over Trump Visit
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Trump Calls His Own Bluff On Aurora
BY: kwtree
IN: Arizona Republican Party Sends Second Mail Piece for Gabe Evans
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Trump Calls His Own Bluff On Aurora
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Colorado GOP Peeing Its Collective Pants Over Trump Visit
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Trump Calls His Own Bluff On Aurora
BY: harrydoby
IN: Trump Calls His Own Bluff On Aurora
BY: harrydoby
IN: Colorado GOP Peeing Its Collective Pants Over Trump Visit
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Colorado GOP Peeing Its Collective Pants Over Trump Visit
BY: Genghis
IN: Colorado GOP Peeing Its Collective Pants Over Trump Visit
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Realistically, isn't Hill likely to be worse than Lamborn?
Realistically, it doesn't seem to matter.
How does Wayne Williams keep his job? First the Keyser petition fraud debacle, now this.
I think this could give his opponent some (hopefully live) ammo.
His opponent, Jena Griswold, would be so much better in so many ways.
The State Supreme Court explicitly stated that the Secretary of State's office did what it is supposed to do under law. All of the challenged petitioners registered to vote in Colorado, signatures matched, petition statements signed and notarized…
The Secretary of State is not supposed to do anything more than that; it is up to challengers to do deeper investigation. So say the judges.
Doug: See ya!!! Wouldn't wanna be ya!!! Smell ya!!! Shouldn't have to tell ya!!!
He well may not be done yet. There's a ruling from the 10th Circuit back in 2008: Yes on Term Limits, Inc. v. Savage
In OkeyDokey, at the time, petition circulators had to swear they were "electors" (an elector being "all citizens of the United States, over the age of eighteen (18) years, who are bona fide residents of this state"). The court found the ban against nonresident circulators to violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments. They ruled similarly on a case in Arvada (Chandler v. City of Arvada, 292 F.3d 1236, 1240 (10th Cir. 2002)). The one caveat being that these folks were circulating initiative petitions, rather than candidate petitions.
The court in Yes on Term Limits spoke about the importance of the First Amendment right to "seek by petition to achieve political change," and I don't see the ability to have your candidate on the ballot as serving some lesser ideal. I'd wait a week or two, if I were Owen Hill, before I started buying copies of Fountainhead for everyone.
Would the petition gatherer falsely swearing as to residency count as an override?
Maybe? I'd have to wonder, though, if the court would get fired up about people violating a restriction that never should have existed, assuming everything else was done correctly. Also, that would mean preventing voters from having the chance to vote for an incumbent who they wanted on the ballot, which they might also want to avoid.
Falsely swearing under penalty of law would fall under the court's "narrow tailoring" for prevention of fraud even if the residency requirement didn't IMHO. Kennedy might have a case that their services fall under Yes on Term Limits, but they have other problems if their petitioners falsely affirme residency. (And in this case, Kennedy appears to have abetted that attempt…)
It would be a fitting end to his career. He will be defined by his bumbling incompetence.
What will his new career be? What on earth is he actually qualified to do?
Why did he not go caucus/assembly route?
Maybe he was worried about getting less than 10% and being barred from the ballot that way?
Remember, Lamborn barely made it onto the ballot through the caucus/assembly process in 2016.
A. He's not that popular.
B. He's not that smart.
C. See A&B.
Nickname is Lamebrain.
When he was in the General Assembly, didn't some of his colleagues refer to him as "Stillborn?"
Two questions/observations:
1. Who did the 5th CD GOP Assembly put on the ballot?
Did both Owen Hill and Daryl Glenn make it on the ballot by that route? Did Lamborn not even try to take that route? What about Bill Rhea and Tyler Stevens? http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/vote/primaryCandidates.html
2. The Colorado Supreme Court reserved the possibility that a constitutional challenge could be made on a non-expedited basis.
The full text of the ruling is:
https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2018/18SA176.pdf
Colonel Mustard?
Colonel Klink?
I see Daryl Glenn made it by petition. https://coloradopolitics.com/republican-darryl-glenn-qualifies-5th-congressional-district-primary-ballot-petition/
The Colorado Springs Independent says:
"Other Republicans who have qualified for the ballot include El Paso County Commissioner Darryl Glenn, state Sen. Owen Hill, retired Texas judge Bill Rhea and former mayor of Green Mountain Falls Tyler Stevens."
https://www.csindy.com/TheWire/archives/politics/
God help us if the best they can come up with are Owen Hill or Darryl Glenn. What putz's.
“The former mayor of Green Mountain Falls.”
I find the judge from Texas who is running to be the most intriguing out of the bunch. Were there no open seats in the Lone Star State in which he could run?
Thanks for the text… yeah, he's likely off.
"If the ruling is upheld, Lamborn won't be able to run as a write-in candidate in the primary, though he could run as a write-in for the general election, Bartels said."
https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/six-term-congressman-doug-lamborn-should-be-off-2018-primary-ballot-colorado-supreme-court-rules
That would be… interesting. Maybe there is a path for Spaulding to win…
I truly hope so. She's an exciting candidate. She seems to have gotten her early financial missteps behind her with hiring a new treasurer, and has raised $123,000 for her campaign, per FEC.
If only EPCO Republicans will back-stab each other so thoroughly that they don't even have time to croak, "Et tu, Brute," before their electoral last gasps.
If Lamborn's "write-in" campaign takes away from Owen or Glenn on the R side, then there may actually be a path for a Spaulding win.
If Lamborn's "write-in" campaign takes away from Owen or Glenn on the R side, then there may actually be a path for a Spaulding win
Absolutely possible. And while this won't be quite as sweet as the Doug Jones win the Alabama, it will still be quite a pleasant surprise.
Only because Moore was such a horrible person. But the thought of a black female pro-choice Democrat representing Focus on the Family, Doug Bruce, and Dr. Chaps is still pretty delicious.
Yeah right, that’ll happen.
If there are four candidates on the GOP 5th CD primary ballot, none incumbents, all sorts of quirky things could happen.
Many voters will receive their ballots not knowing that Lamborn is not on the ballot and having done no research on the alternatives and may write in Lamborn (futilely) or may not vote for anyone.
Also, there will be the unknown effect of allowing unaffiliated voters to vote in the primary this year.
We've seen this before. Remember Lamborn's first run in 2006? There were seven candidates in the running including Jeff Crank, Lionel Rivera, Bentley Rayburn, and a former sheriff of El Paso County. (Not the shirtless one. Someone who kept all his clothes on.) There were so many running, Lamborn got nominated as a plurality winner.
Of course, the anti-Lamborn Republicans learned nothing because two years later, they did it again with multiple challengers.
It looked like this year would be the same – Daryl Glenn, Owen Hill, a Texas judge and the Green Mountain mayor – except Lamborn surprised them all by knocking himself off the primary ballot.
Lamborn now has lame duck-like qualities….
Yeay for lame-duck-like qualities!
That likely means we can look forward to a hastily slapped-together declaratory judgment action in state and/or federal district court. Let the good times roll.
I doubt that can move fast or competently enough to save him. When do the primary ballots get placed in the mail?
Final certification is Friday, unless a court issues an injunction.
May 25 ballots must be printed and in the clerk's hands. June 4 ballots can be mailed.
I think there is also a 45-day requirement for service personnel and voters overseas, which would be May 11 if my fingers and toes did the math right.
Lots of dormant Dems down here. Don’t let this historic opportunity pass.
But are they pure enough for you? What if some of them are DLC-types and DINOs ?
Nobody understands Ahab. <snark>
I do – most of the time. We agree that policy matters more than the labels attached – you can have a bought-off Dem or a Republican with integrity – although those are getting rarer these days. And we do have to have power (politics – the D vs R horse race) in order to actualize policy (truth, justice, and the American Way).
I agree with most of what Zap says – I just don't feel a need to be heavily negative or provocative, nor to endlessly repeat myself.
That's fair. Most of my beef with him is the endlessly repeating himself over attacking pols who are more likely to actualize the policy he wants.
Corey Hutchins has a detailed follow up in the Colorado Independent:
Is that toast I smell burning?
I personally liked the note in the opinion that stated that the man gave his deposition to the district court remotely because he was closing on a house – in California. (To be honest, that's his current job – flipping houses – but still, being out-of-state on a hearing date to determine your residency because you're buying a house?)
Yes, I recall that from the earlier ruling. And the circuit court said that was ok by their rules! Incredible…
A Federal Court might intervene, but it wouldn't be to overrule our residency requirements. Our Circuit Court doesn't seem to like residency requirements, for initiatives anyway. But in this case residency is for the purpose of partisan registration qualification requirements… If the courts venture too far down that path, we wind up with anyone being able to circulate and sign petitions for any party.
The conservative mantra is to outsource everything, including apparently collecting petition signatures. Looks like it bit them. Sad.
Sounds like Lamborn will challenge the residency (and hence party affiliation) requirement in Federal court…
Dougie should have a future in the revolving door Trump administration that prefers incompetence.
Somewhere in those hallowed halls there will be someone looking for a seasoned maroon to peddle their snake oil. Don't worry, these anti-government carnival barkers just can't seem to extract themselves from the teat. Any bets on how soon he'll find himself in a new tax bracket? Maybe Brownback needs someone to carry his bags?
So that's what Brownback is up to now — feet up on his desk reading the paper, on the look out for oppressed white Christians anywhere in the world full of heathens. Probably has nice long chats with Mike Pence every day to pass the time. They have so much in common:
If all else fails, both Lamborn and Brownback could probably find real work helping Jim Bakker peddling his holy food buckets . . .
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4YSJo_2WJyY
https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/12/03/456677535/apocalypse-chow-we-tried-televangelist-jim-bakkers-survival-food
. . . wonder how Lamborn would look in a wig and make-up??!
Tammy Faye would be spinning in her grave.
And Blue Apron has nothing to fear.
As our wayward village idiot might say — Pretty much sums up all of Jesus' teachings. Of course the fact that it’s a complete ripoff and lie pretty much sums up today’s Republican Party
Don't you look forward to the day when every hungry child has food and the Air Force has to hold a bake sale?
PS: I have a hunch the wig and make-up will make his butt look big.
Michael, I think this is the quote you were going for, courtesy of Northern Sun:
It will be a great day when our schools get all the money they need and the air force has to hold a bake sale to buy a bomber.