Never a Dull Moment in Longmont

It’s not often you hear about big-league dirty tricks in a city council election, but most cities aren’t Longmont, Colorado.

Two years ago, a big fight in Longmont over the proposed annexation of a commercial development by LifeBridge Christian Church to the city created lasting division. Opponents contended that the annexation was a bad deal for the city, requiring city services to be connected to a commercial development that sought to shield itself from many taxes as a religious organization. The annexation failed, but the emnity the fight caused has persisted.

Fast-forward to today, the Longmont Times-Call reports:

Longmont City Councilwoman Karen Benker says she’s the target of secret groups that are playing dirty politics.

Benker, who is running for re-election for the Ward 2 council seat, filed three complaints with the City Clerk’s Office on Monday, one of which was about a Sept. 23 telephone poll.

In her complaint, Benker said the “push poll” was biased against her and brought up policy positions that were untrue.

But the groups that did the poll – Western Tradition Partnership and the Longmont Leadership Committee – say the poll was legitimate (not a push poll) and that polling voters doesn’t fall under the city’s campaign finance laws, so they haven’t violated any regulations.

“Push polls” are phone calls that are dishonestly presented as public-opinion surveys but really are meant to sway voters…

We were forwarded some of the ‘questions’ being asked in this ‘legitimate’ poll, reportedly conducted from somewhere in Virginia:

“If you knew that Karen Benker discriminated against a Christian church, costing the city of Longmont millions of dollars in lost tax revenue, would you be more or less likely to vote for her?”

“If you knew that Karen Benker supported welfare for illegal aliens, would you be more or less likely to vote for her?”

At least they left child molesters and ACORN out, right?

Adding to the mystery over these calls is Benker’s opponent, Katie Witt. Witt, an unsuccessful candidate for the state Senate in 2008, has connections to the Golden-based Independence Institute, was the Statewide Field Coordinator for “Coloradans for Marriage” in 2006, as well as the State Director for presidential candidate Mitt Romney last year. She is frequently mentioned by Republicans as a possible star candidate for higher office–but she needs to get elected to something first. There’s also a relatively obscure telecom ballot issue in Longmont, 2C, that has drawn in oddly big players like Americans for Prosperity–usually an indicator of a proxy campaign meant to impact related candidates.

And don’t miss this wonderfully tasteless little blog that popped up recently, with the banner art featuring Braveheart chopping off Karen Benker’s head. Stay classy, locals.

Bottom line: we’ve talked a few times about the strategy by Republicans to groom their next generation of candidates in “nonpartisan” local elections. Witt certainly fits that profile, and the disproportionate hardball resources being brought to bear on her behalf…fit the profile too.

0 Shares

13 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. Middle of the Road says:

    On the blog, guess what the latest entry at the top is titled?

    Part 2 of a 3-Part Series on Civility in Longmont


  2. twas brillig says:

    That the ED of the the Western Tradition Partnership is a former Musgrave staffer, Jacob Leis.  

  3. BlueCat says:

    Although the Libertarian candidate (of course it’s technically a non-partisan election but we all know how to google), Nicks, is rather amusing. He’s so clearly using a city council run in hopes of getting a foot in the door to move on to better things to push the Libertarian agenda.  His big thing is eminent domain but there are no eminent domain issues on the horizon at the moment so this an odd issue choice except for the fact that it’s such a classic Libertarian meme. But no real nastiness from any quarter so far. Just good old small town values civility.  A stolen sign or two is about it for intrigue.  

  4. I VOTE says:

    Ooops, you forgot some stuff. Stuff that Karen Benker would rather people not know.

    Get your facts straight and include ALL the facts. Facts that Ms Benker seems to try to duck and hide from at every turn. Not surprised she’s crying foul. We don’t need anonymous polls. Just the facts m’am.

    http://www.wrongmont.blogspot.com  

  5. Laughing Boy says:

    Oh.  Oops – my bad.

  6. WestSloper says:

    Western Tradition Partnership had a role in last year’s Garfield County commissioner races.  

    As described in the Aspen Daily:

    Bozeman, Mont.-based Western Tradition Partnership — founded by two conservative Montana politicians who launched the nonprofit by soliciting money from extractive industry executives

    Looks like those oil and gas guys are slinging money around to secure their ties with the religious Right — revving up that engine for the 2010 elections.

    • twas brillig says:

      those MT boys are happy to use their (c)4 as a cut out for money that wants to stay hidden. They get a percentage, the Colorado and/or special interest connection is hidden, and a former Musgrave goober gets a line on his resume. Win-win!  

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.