U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 30, 2016 09:45 PM UTC

The Key To Watching Trump’s Immigation Speech.

  •  
  • by: doko

Maybe Kellyanne Conway wasn’t paying attention to the Republican primary season and debates. How else to explain her recent lame attempts to minimize Trump’s pledge to deport all 11 million people in the USA illegally, by saying that Trump hasn’t even “mentioned” that pledge since November and in a couple of the debates. As if he only “mentioned” it in the same manner that he would mention any throwaway item on the campaign trail.

In fact, Trump’s deportation pledge was one the four cornerstones of his immigration policy: Build The Wall; Make Mexico Pay For It; Deport Everyone Here Illegally;  No Amnesty. These were the equally important swords that Trump used to attack his primary opponents. As none of the slogans consisted of more than five words, they were perfect raw meat to feed Trump’s supporters who had no interest in learning about any policy that couldn’t be completely described within the confines of a fortune cookie.

When he couldn’t get away with just parroting his slogans, he explained his deportation pledge in black and white terms during the February 25 Republican debate:

“We have at least 11 million people in this country that came in illegally. They will go out. They will come back — some will come back, the best, through a process. They have to come back legally. They have to come back through a process, and it may not be a very quick process, but I think that’s very fair, and very fine.”

So now, surprise surprise, Trump wants to appeal to more voters. He is under the illusion that people who saw him use his immigration policy as his hallmark issue to bludgeon anyone who disagreed with him, will now believe his new explanation (which he will no doubt awkwardly read from a teleprompter). This brings us to tomorrow’s Big Speech. How can Trump weaken his un-empathetic, black and white, fairy tale of an immigration policy without alienating his supporters who signed up for just such a policy?

My prediction. He will barely mention the deportation policy, and when he does, he will not describe what he says as a change. Instead, he will fill the air with everything that he believes relates to immigration, including the other three core components of his policy, sanctuary cities, crime by immigrants, jobs taken by immigrants, voting fraud by immigrants, the need to speak English, health care provided to immigrants, drivers licenses, etc. etc. But the key to making this work for his existing supporters is that they can’t think he is weakening his position. So what will Trump do? In his speech, he’ll tell them over and over again how strong his policies are, so that after the speech, the takeaway by his supporters will be that Trump just gave a really strong speech on immigration! Even if he doesn’t deport everyone, he’ll still be really strong, and a lot stronger than anyone else.

If I’m right, the key to look for in the speech is how many times Trump says the word “strong” (or its derivatives, like stronger, strongest and strength). It’s difficult to decide how to bet on the over/under for how many times he uses those words, especially because we don’t even know how long the speech will be. My guess is more than eight times. You can make your own prediction. But one thing should be clear. The more he uses those words, the more concern he has about how much he has weakened one of his core policies. And once again, for the man who supposedly tells it like it is, it depends on what the definition of “is” is.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

52 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!