The Denver Post's Kurtis Lee reports on drama yesterday in the Colorado Senate over Senate Bill 14-175, the Reproductive Health Freedom Act. After several days of intense controversy, what was once an important bill for at least some Democrats to close out this year's legislative session is now dead–and the finger-pointing is well underway:
Rather than battle Republicans over a proposal they stressed would help protect reproductive rights, Senate Democrats on Wednesday spiked the legislation — a move that drew applause from some religious groups packed into the chamber's gallery who strongly opposed it…
All Senate Republicans, alongside the Archdiocese of Denver, denounced the legislation as "overreaching" and "ambiguous," saying the measure was not needed.
"It's a solution in search of a problem," said Sen. Bernie Herpin, R-Colorado Springs. "There is no one, no evidence, that has said there's a denial of things like contraception to women in Colorado."
Sen. Andy Kerr, D-Lakewood, who sponsored the measure, said he carried it because constituents expressed at town halls and forums concerns over efforts in other states to make it more difficult for women to seek guidance on abortions and receive common forms of contraception.
From Senate President Morgan Carroll's statement after Senate Bill 175 was killed:
We were optimistic that the Republicans would come on board with a proposal that would ensure all women are able to make private and personal reproductive health decisions with freedom from government interference. But we are disappointed that we were unable to get bi-partisan support to acknowledge and uphold the values of the majority of Coloradans.
With 21 days left in the legislative session and 269 bills still pending, having a GOP filibuster would bring D.C. style dysfunction to Colorado. We have made our point and in the interest of getting the remaining work done, on education, jobs, higher education affordability and childcare, we laid the bill over.
We will continue to fight against attacks on women and their private healthcare decisions and uphold the values of Colorado women and families.
On the other side, here's the story as told by the Catholic News Agency:
Amid growing protests led in large part by the Catholic Church, the Colorado Senate on April 16 killed a controversial bill that could have banned all pro-life laws in the state…
Originally introduced March 31, the controversial bill – S.B. 175 – only gained wide publicity last week. It sought to ban all new pro-life laws and regulations, including requirements for pre-abortion ultrasounds and restrictions on the RU-486 abortion drug.
With the bill now dead, there are reporters and Republicans who say this was a "quixotic effort"–but clearly the bill's religious opponents didn't agree while they massed crowds at the Capitol to oppose it. Proponents point to new restrictions on abortion being passed around the nation, as well as other so-called "pre-emptive" bills, like a bill signed in Oklahoma just this week that pre-emptively bans future minimum wage increases and paid sick day laws, to justify both the intent and functional precedent for the Reproductive Health Freedom Act.
It's our understanding and has been reported, though victorious Republicans deny it today, that threats were leveled by the Senate Minority to bring the entire chamber to a halt for the rest of the legislative session if Senate Bill 175 passed–which could have endangered dozens of important bills. The fact is, Democrats are on solid ground, given the polling on the abortion issue and the overwhelming defeat of abortion ban initiatives in Colorado, pushing a bill to affirmatively protect reproductive choice rights. For that reason alone, predictions that the defeat of Senate Bill 175 has major ramifications seem overblown–certainly not to the degree that Republicans harmed themselves by killing the popular civil unions bill two years ago. In the eyes of voters, questions about efficacy and timing aside, Democrats were on the right side of the issue.
If anything? If you have to take on the Catholic Church, Holy Week might not be the best timing…
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Meiner49er
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: davebarnes
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: bullshit!
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
You can try to spin this all you want, Colorado Pols. Democrats went too far and awakened the sleeping giant: not gun owners this time, but pro-life Christians. Gun owners know protesting against the ruling Democrat Party is useless, and they're waiting until November to make their voices heard at the ballot box. But it's been awhile since pro-life Christians stood up to Democrat bullying. I'm very proud of them!!
The only thing I agree with is that Holy Week was a terrible time to attack pro-life Christians. That shows me how little regard Democrats have for people of faith.
Get used to losing Democrats! Next year, you won't have a majority at all.
You're tiresome. Ask the Borg for new material.
Don't take my word for it, read Eli Stokols (below).
I wouldn't take your word for anything,ever. It's worthless. You are completely without honor.
No worries Modster. Nobody takes your word for anything.
I will take the Modsters word.
BC, Have you been reading about what is going on in Eastern Ukraine?
Neville Obama is twittling while the Russia surrogates round up the Jews.
What's next, Obama is not going to invite his bud Putin to his birthday party if they round up all the Jews?
If they don't "register" they will take away their property. Where have I heard about that before?
like she said…
Who gave you permission to speak? GOP is still going to lose and lose big. Enjoy your insular world that is all fantasy and not realistic.
I never thought I'd say this, but liberal reporter Eli Stokols nails it:
http://kdvr.com/2014/04/16/senate-democrats-kill-anti-personhood-proposal/
once again the neo-christians forced their agenda into our politial process…Seperation of Church and State needs to be maintained….
Did you know that Stool is a crack addict and a very bad liar with no credibility? Faux likes to hire airheads.
All opposed to this bill are in favor of politicians determining medical decision making.
It's all very simple: Democrats oppose regulations, and Republicans favor them.
OMG. A duel between Modster and the puppie. Dumber and Dumberer. That is if puppy is even a real person.
puppie's excess of exuberance and lack of judgment/perspective makes me believe this is a 15 year old (possibly younger).
Make cracks all you want bit someone’s gotta troll the trolls. I am honored to take the job (as soon as I repair my laptop screen on Sunday).
Stool? Crack addict? WTF are you talking about puppy?
Re: your laptop screen: It's a bad idea to erase it with a rubber eraser. White-out also not great idea.
Better idea: Think before you post.
What! White-out is not a good idea?! No wonder I have trouble reading my posts….
Save yourself some money. Nobody really gives a shit what you have to say.
PS How many times has the sleeping giant been awakened now? Does he just hit snooze every ten minutes?
Narcoleptic.
Colorado legislators create pre-emptive bills all the time:
"There shall be no gay marriage in Colorado ever".
"Any tax increase must be approved by the voters via the initiative process."
Ensuring women's access to contraception in the future would have been appropriate, and would have fit Colorado's history as the first state to make abortion legal in cases of rape and incest. Colorado has always led in women's reproductive choice. This bill would have continued that tradition.
I have to say that I don't get the purpose of this bill beyond, as its sponsor notes, reacting to actions in other more conservative states.
At the state level, this bill would have done effectively nothing – if the legislature has enough votes to write new restrictions in the future, simply passing those new restrictions is sufficient to override this bill. At the local level I'm less sure, but it seems to me that Colorado's state laws might already cover it. Certainly we haven't seen much in the way of action from local jurisdictions.
So for all that it brought the Republican anti-choicers out of the woodwork to defeat it, I don't know that it makes much of a difference, or that it was much more than a knee-jerk reaction to other states' conservatives in the first place.