U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 18, 2012 12:22 AM UTC

Rep. Cindy Acree: "Somebody's Gonna Hurt"

  •  
  • by: Colorado Pols

A statement remarkable for its “let them eat cake” aloofness on the matter of Medicaid coverage for poor Colorado children and families, recorded last week from Rep. Cindy Acree of Colorado House District 40. Rep. Acree, as you may know, is one of the Democratic Party’s principal targets this year as they campaign to retake the one-seat GOP majority Colorado House.

Top-targeted incumbents should definitely be more careful than this:

CINDY ACREE: if we expand Medicaid beyond the 400 percent–the 400,000 recipients we currently have–how are going to pay for it? We need to help people pay their own way. Okay. We need to make sure we don’t expand Medicaid beyond the poorest of the poor, and get off the backs of insurance companies [Pols emphasis] and allow them to offer products that people can afford. The state’s the barrier for most child-only policies, the state’s the barrier when we don’t allow companies to give you major medical-only policies. For some reason we have this idea that nothing is better than something.

We can’t be everything to everybody. And we’ve got to tighten our belt, and we’re going to have to cut things that aren’t necessary to the function of general society, and we’re going to have to move on. Somebody’s gonna hurt. That’s just the way it is. [Pols emphasis]

For a generic Republican candidate, some of this “belt tightening” rhetoric makes sense–or at least might not be considered as politically damaging. In a newly competitive district like Rep. Acree’s, though, cutting health care for poor kids and families is not a subject we would choose to expound on. Acree’s HD-40 seat is one of a number that became dramatically more competitive following reapportionment, a situation she has never encountered.

And based on this little stream of consciousness, she might not be ready for the competition.

Even if we did decide to engage on this delicate issue, we would never, ever say “somebody’s gonna hurt” in reference to a policy goal we are seeking to achieve. That’s the kind of rhetoric that maybe goes over alright in a safe GOP district, but horrifies everybody else.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

79 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!