Last week, several Catholic bishops along the Front Range issued a controversial opinion that Catholic Colorado lawmakers who support the Reproductive Health Equity Act, this year’s codification of abortion rights into state statute ahead of the anticipated repeal of Roe v. Wade, should not take part in the sacrament of Communion–an extremely harsh penalty only a step short of excommunication.
Since last week’s dramatic announcement, there’s been little local follow-up press, but as Kathryn Post at the Religious News Service reports, Colorado’s Catholic Democrats are pushing back hard against the local bishops, rejecting meddling by the clergy in their work making laws to protect everyone:
But Rep. David Ortiz, one of the Catholic lawmakers in question, said the bishops were confusing spirituality and politics. “Writing this open letter is a very political statement,” said Ortiz. “It is not stewarding people’s souls, it’s being a politician. If they want to be politicians, they should run for office.”
Some of the lawmakers say they will comply and stay away from the Communion rail, while others say the letter, signed by four Catholic bishops, including the Rev. Samuel J. Aquila, the archbishop of Denver, will not deter them from receiving the sacrament…
Rep. Monica Duran, who is Catholic, said she supported the legislation because lack of access to abortion care disproportionately impacts vulnerable communities and people of color. She rejected the bishops’ letter, saying “it sends the wrong message” to practicing Catholics.
What could be the real problem for Denver’s politically active Archbishop Samuel Aquila and his fellow Front Range Bishops is that Pope Francis, whose apostolic authority (we’re pretty sure that’s what you call it) trumps that of a mere bishop, has already taken a dim view of the similar call last year for President Joe Biden to be refused Communion over his support for abortion rights:
State Sen. Sonya Jaquez Lewis, who was raised Catholic but no longer considers herself a member of the church, told Religion News Service she was shocked to hear of the bishops’ letter, especially in light of the Vatican’s instruction to U.S. bishops to tread carefully when they considered withholding Communion from President Joe Biden over his support for abortion rights last fall.
Pope Francis told reporters at the time that “every time the bishops have not managed a problem as pastors, they have taken a political stance on a political problem.” [Pols emphasis]
Last October, President Biden was told by the Pope to keep receiving Communion despite a call by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (which includes Denver’s Archbishop Aquila) for politicians who support abortion rights to abstain. There’s an unresolved conflict at work here between American bishops who want to impose religious penalties on politicians and the supposedly infallible head of the Catholic Church who seems to want to steer the Church clear of overheated American politics.
Perhaps it will be necessary for the Holy Father to lay down the law in Colorado’s case, too.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: davebarnes
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: bullshit!
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Pope Francis says traditionalist Catholics are ‘gagging’ the reforms of Vatican II
I'm pretty sure the brown-skinned, Jewish immigrant would much rather the Church focus on ideas to soften the misery hiding in plain site outside the front doors of the Basilica.
The correct response to Catholic Church management is always: so, how is that child molestation going?
A correction — unless I missed something, SOME Catholic Bishops started a discussion about withholding Communiion, then carefully slunk away when consequences became a greater part of the conversation.
Washington Post: After controversy, U.S. Catholic bishops say there will be ‘no national policy on withholding Communion from politicians’
Second — church polity allows a Conference to advise, but the actual decisions are made by the hierarchy. Pope, Cardinals, Archbishops & Bishops have realms of responsibility. And those responsible for Delaware and Washington DC had already made it clear that President Biden would not be excluded from the sacrament in their jurisdiction.
We stand by this as written. They did vote for this policy, but then decided not to enforce it.
And now it looks like it is being enforced in Colorado.
Thanks for the additional context though, it's useful.
Those attending the meeting of the Conference voted (overwhelmingly) for a statement to be written. The debate preceding that vote made it clear WHY the statement was needed (Biden’s added prominence) and who they expected to be included (politicians supporting abortion rights legislation).
The process did continue, the document was presented and voted on in the fall of 2021. WAPO said at the time “The text called the Eucharist the most profound way God accompanies Catholics and called people back to church, saying “we miss you and we love you.” It also emphasized the “special responsibility” of Catholic public figures to shape their own views based on “the Church’s faith and moral law.” It said bishops are responsible “to work to remedy situations that involve public actions at variance with the visible communion of the Church and the moral law.” It didn’t take the controversial step of calling for a communion ban.
Bishops and Archbishops already had the authority to set the standard. A few already have: Among them: “Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco last month called on his highest-profile parishioner, U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, to refrain from receiving Communion as long as she continues to support legal abortion.” Others showed support. A list at https://aleteia.org/2022/06/10/more-catholic-bishops-say-pro-abortion-politicians-shouldnt-receive-communion/
Catholic women have abortions in proportion to all other women. Maybe, once we’ve reduced the Catholic number to ‘0’, we can wag our finger at everyone else?
And upwards of 80% of Catholic women of child bearing age have used, or are using, artificial birth control. Seems like the bishops are having problems getting their "flocks" to believe in their rule.
Only thing I remember about it: The the priest running the U.S. bishops' conference was found using Grindr, a gay dating app.
Meh. Their club, their rules.
Having said that, as soon as a club starts putting invitations requirements to the meal they are serving, it is no longer the "Lord's Table"…its theirs. Jesus didn't turn anyone away from receiving the meal and the promise it represents.
What the guys in the magenta dresses are serving isn't "communion", its a crappy meal of, to borrow Trump's description, "a little cracker and a little juice" that has lost all meaning.
How to serve mammon instead of Jesus, a primer, sponsored by the Catholic bishops of Colorado.
Hey, people have been thrown out of windows for less. I say good on Ortiz, Duran, and Jaquez-Lewis.
So if the bishops are ignoring the Pope, does that put them in violation of their calling? Should they then also be refused Communion?
"the Pope" is also a bishop of Rome. As I understand it, kinda "first among equals" in many ways. Only the formally released encyclicals and papal bulls are "authoritative." Beyond that, he can advise and set a tone. For example,
There is no new Catholic position on homosexuality just because the Pope is tolerant.