U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 26, 2011 10:39 PM UTC

Gessler not willing to make cuts in SOS office

  •  
  • by: softie

(We don’t need no stinkin’ budget cuts – promoted by redstateblues)

Scott Gessler is making headlines again, and again, they’re not the good kind.  Gessler has concluded that his office will not do its part to balance the budget. As an (assumed) fiscal conservative, he wants the cuts to take place elsewhere, in less important programs, like school breakfasts and K12.

HuffPost reports, but was first reported by Tim Hoover.  

At issue: his predecessor Bernie Buscher found efficiencies, and was able to save $3.5 million.  This money would go to help the state balance its budget. Gessler now wants to keep the $3.5 million, and not allow the money for general use. This is money that would go towards mitigating the deep cuts the legislature must make this year.

And what does he want to use the $3.5 million for? Apparently he wants to help businesses avoid identity theft.  Perhaps an important service (editor’s note: Colorado is third in the nation in identity theft – rsb) but is it really the best investment when we will have to continue to make deep cuts from K12 and Medicaid?

And politically, what is he thinking? Why is it a good time to bring this idea up?  I believe that the JBC has authority over the amount of SOS funds in the first place, and I can’t imagine that they are going to want to increase funds to the SOS from what the original request was. That means that Gessler is creating these bad headlines and probably nothing will come out of it.

Does he enjoy negative press?

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

93 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!