CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 10, 2019 07:03 AM UTC

Weekend Open Thread

  • 24 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

“Man is a rational animal who always loses his temper when he is called upon to act in accordance with the dictates of reason.”

–Oscar Wilde

Comments

24 thoughts on “Weekend Open Thread

    1. How about this, Michael?

      "The Clintons had Epstein eliminated because he knew too much about Whitewater, Seth Rich, and the Clinton Foundation getting millions from Russian oligarchs."

        1. Perhaps you need to read a little closer, MJ, and be a little less thin-skinned. Michael appeared to be asking for "conspiracy theories" in a sarcastic way.

          Of course, the Trump-turd will be tweeting about the Clintons. So will Hannity, Ingraham, Limbaugh, Breitbart, and all the other far right wing "experts." I'm not including Tucker Carlson in that group since he's "on vacation."

          1. Sigh. I was agreeing with your premise, and posting a link in support.

            I just won’t respond to your posts without giant disclaimers about not criticizing you. Who’s thin-skinned, here?

      1. lol

        Since the Clintons are responsible for fully 88.1% of all murders committed in the U.S. since their marriage in 1975, it is highly likely that they offed Epstein. However, the more probable reason is to protect the pizzagate pedophile ring. 

        Or maybe it was the Illuminati, who were concerned that Epstein was about to blow the whistle on their plot to weaponize vaccines for use in a way of extermination against the white race.

        But regardless of the precise mechanics of Epstein's demise, here's hoping it was horrifically painful. 

      1. Can't name him without Skilling, Fastow, Causey
        Alan Stanford
        B. Madoff
        Nacchio
        Ebbers
        Frankel
        Israel & Marino
        Leeson
        Rusnak
        And a host of others.

        I'm sure Epstein was just as criminal – see Panama Papers and (if you can) their redactions

        But his motive was more…. traditional. Sure power through money and uber wealth. But it seems like was aiming for Charlemagne or Khan for progeny and legacy.

  1. In an interesting twist, some people note that Epstein was the only person who could reasonably hope to block any of the material found in a search of his domiciles from coming into court.  Loss of that avenue of defense diminishes the motive for a "named associate" to be the one backing the "suicide."

     

     

    1. Because someone knows what is in that material and isn't worried.

      As long as the crime is "just" sex with live girls  this case is over. Well “over” except for movies and books and civil litigation.
       

  2. WOTD from Rachel Bitecofer: "18 Top Targets for Democrats in the House for 2020".

    The table below identifies these districts, as well as several others Democrats did contest but came up short in for the 2018 cycle. Nine of these districts are in Texas, which increasing looks like it should be Ground 0 of the Democrats’ 2020 efforts. However, actually flipping these districts would require a massive investment in an area Democrats have continually under-invested in: Latino turnout. Democrats’ success in increasing the size of their House majority will largely depend on whether they come to recognize the need to maximize turnout among Democratic-friendly constituencies such as college-educated women, Latinos, African Americans, and Millennials and in their ability to understand that it is fear of Trump, not policy, that will best motivate these voters to the polls, no matter what the voters themselves may think. Given the rampant misdiagnosis of how Democrats came upon their House majority in the 1st place…

    "9 Texas Districts"

    Bitecofer believes that the primary turnout driver in 2018 was hatred of Trump among college educated, suburban women, rather than healthcare or white working class men.

    This article was posted Aug 6, before the anti-Mexican terrorist attacks in El Paso.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

84 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!