U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 09, 2009 06:14 PM UTC

McInnis v. Penry: Now It's War

  •  
  • by: Colorado Pols

Conventional wisdom (which we never subscribed to) held that GOP gubernatorial candidate Josh Penry would post a substantially higher Q3 fundraising total than opponent Scott McInnis. Though we acknowledge the polls that show McInnis in the (very) early lead, we perceived momentum very clearly building for Penry over the last few months at McInnis’ expense.

As of yesterday, that conventional wisdom is in need of alteration–and with it a number of other assumptions about McInnis’ viability in this race. Things that previously looked disastrous for McInnis are being reassessed, as the Denver Post reports:

Gubernatorial contender Scott McInnis RSVP’d that he would attend a candidate forum later this month but only after organizers agreed there would be no debate with his primary rival, Josh Penry.

McInnis’ campaign also asked that the candidates not be on the stage at the same time.

The requests, coupled with McInnis’ decision to skip a straw poll last month when the Colorado Republican Party held its fall meeting, puzzled a number of GOP members, most of all Penry.

McInnis’ campaign said the focus needs to be on booting Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter in 2010 instead of on debates that could lead to intraparty squabbles…

Penry and Maes have attended more forums than McInnis, which two Denver political consultants said is understandable.

“It’s probably the first good management move I’ve seen by the McInnis people,” said Democratic consultant Steve Welchert. “He has the name ID, and he doesn’t have to play these games.”

Consultant Eric Sondermann, who is unaffiliated, said the candidates are practicing “predictable politics.”

“McInnis is playing the role you would expect of the top dog, and Penry is playing the role of the insurgent underdog,” Sondermann said. “I think the risk for McInnis is . . . he can’t let it become part of his image that he won’t take on his challenger.”

After McInnis’ very good quarter, he obviously thinks the last few months of debate evasion and on-air gaffes won’t hurt him in the long run. He’s the frontrunner now for the GOP nomination, a position that allows him to be “selective” in his public appearances. Given how those appearances have gone so far, we don’t blame him for wanting that to be true.

But Penry isn’t going to just fold. By now it’s evident that Penry is the preference of the Republican base, and Penry’s supporters have shown no compunction about viciously attacking McInnis at every oppportunity. That’s going to intensify in the coming weeks, while Penry’s campaign scrutinizes “McLobbyist’s” huge take for embarrassments–attempting to turn McInnis’ re-proven ability to raise coin against him.

Bottom line: McInnis answered the contempt expressed toward him by Penry and the GOP base, who assumed McInnis’ long goodbye would begin with Penry posting a dominant total for Q3. Now that McInnis has defied them, the real blood will begin to flow.

Oh, and why in the hell is The Post talking about what Dan Maes is doing?  

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

53 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!