CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 02, 2016 06:28 AM UTC

Friday Open Thread

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

“Yesterday’s weirdness is tomorrow’s reason why.”

–Hunter S. Thompson

Comments

12 thoughts on “Friday Open Thread

  1. Recent item in the Denver Post. Outdoor recreation; a $646 billion industry nationwide; will now be added to the federal government's annual compilation of gross domestic product (GDP). A bill, co-sponsored by Colorado's own Senator Cory Gardner, passed both the House and Senate by unanimous votes, and is on its way to the President's desk, who is expected to sign it.

    Thank you, Senator Gardner, for your efforts on behalf of Colorado's, and the nation's, outdoor recreation economies. 

    1. Sen. Gardner's legislation doesn't improve the outdoor recreation economy – it merely officially recognizes it as a valid accounting entry. 

      He could trace the industry AND actually increase GDP by having them include state-legal marijuana.

      An interesting discussion is whether marijuana produced and sold in states in which it is legal is included in GDP. At the moment, any marijuana (and more potent drugs) sold in the United States is illegal according to federal (national) law. Therefore, marijuana production is not included in our country's GDP.    [Source:  Inflate Your Mind]

      1. Gardner's legislation wasn't intended to improve the outdoor recreation economy. We'll see how he comes down next year on issues like turning over public lands to special interests, etc. He's generally been good thus far on that type of issue.

        Sorry, but a drug like marijuana is not part of the outdoor recreation economy, altho somebody may slip a toke on the ski slopes. In your thinking, alcohol should also be a part since some people carry flasks on their backpacking trips.

      1. Andrew: Hillary did not request the recount; Jill Stein was the one. But even if somehow both Wisconsin and Michigan would flip over to Hillary, Hillary is still at 258 electoral votes and Trump at 280. Like it or not, Trump looks to be the guy and, no matter how anyone voted, the country is in for a wild ride the next 4 years. Recall the old Chinese proverb or curse: "may you live in interesting times." 

  2. OK, everyone, into the pool!  No, really, everyone get in the pool now.  No, Clarence, I don't care if you're allergic to chlorine, get into the fucking pool.

    A great piece at the Colorado Independent:

    Forced pooling is not mandatory swim practice
    Colorado law compels communities that own their mineral rights to lease them against their will

    In an email response to questions, (COGCC Director) Lepore wrote that the Commission has not yet encountered a situation where “all or nearly all” of a large number of mineral owners in a spacing unit “are united in opposition to leasing their minerals.” He said that if there is significant resistance, companies may eventually decide it’s too expensive and cumbersome to deal with so many “non-consenting interest owners.” At present, however, “the Colorado the Oil and Gas Conservation Act does not contain a minimum leased or participating acreage percentage requirement for a pooling order to be entered (thus, in theory, a 1% mineral owner could pool the other 99% owners),” Lepore wrote.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

214 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!