In another edition of "At Least He's Not Your Legislator," we visit Washington State for another Republican comment reminiscent of President Ronald Reagan's infamous statement that "trees cause more pollution than automobiles." From The Associated Press:
A Washington state lawmaker has apologized for saying that bicyclists contribute to climate change with their heavy breathing.
Republican Rep. Ed Orcutt, of Kalama, is the ranking minority member of the state's House Transportation Committee. He apologized Monday for writing in an email last week that "the act of riding a bike results in greater emissions of carbon dioxide from the rider."
Rep. Orcutt tried to explain that his comment was a poorly-worded attempt to say that bicyclists don't have a zero carbon footprint, which would seem to be an effort to associate breathing with industrialization on some ridiculous level. No, this was a poorly-worded attempt at trying to say something halfway intelligent in general, and it failed.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: fow eyy
IN: No Odor in the Pod (feat. Christy Powell)
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: ParkHill
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Even More Felony Charges For Colorado Coup Plotters Jenna Ellis, John Eastman
BY: Colorado Pols
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
"bicyclists don't have a zero carbon footprint" is correct.
The true "concerned citizen" just commits suicide and helps save the world.
What? You don't think decomposing releases carbon? Of course it does – it's got to go somewhere.
The true concerned citizen plants and cares for more trees and plants than are needed to respirate all that CO2 back into O2.
I've never seen a calculaiton – but I'm estimating 500sf of green leaves per year – at least half of which will grow much larger.