Apparently one of the ‘concerns’ House Republicans have with the school breakfast program is that it might be fostering the scourge of childhood obesity.
It’s irrefutable logic, and Republicans’ solution to the issue is pretty brilliant: if you don’t feed poor kids, they probably won’t get fat.
Anyway, go over to that blog that the big Denver newspaper runs to read what Tim Hoover has written about it. A small taste…
Sen. Kent Lambert, one of the Republicans on the Joint Budget Committee who voted against supplemental funding for a school breakfast subsidy for poor children, has had concerns about such programs in the past.In 2009, Lambert, R-Colorado Springs, submitted questions to the Colorado Department of Education about its overall approach on nutrition.
“Is the Department looking at reducing childhood obesity, especially among the poor? What are they doing to decrease it?” Lambert asked.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Now Trump’s Selling For-Profit Bibles
BY: skeptical citizen
IN: Now Trump’s Selling For-Profit Bibles
BY: Early Worm
IN: Now Trump’s Selling For-Profit Bibles
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Get More Smarter on Wednesday (March 27)
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Get More Smarter on Wednesday (March 27)
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Get More Smarter on Wednesday (March 27)
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Get More Smarter on Wednesday (March 27)
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Now Trump’s Selling For-Profit Bibles
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Additionally, we shouldn’t be offering free meals to children until each and every one of them has paid off the $44,900 share of the national debt they’ve racked up.
Irresponsible, fat, free-loading, snot-nosed little buggers, every last one of them.
Sometimes they walk on my lawn.
Those little fuckers are just askin’ for it.
they were just “askin’ for” some lunch money? Slippery slope, I guess.
A return to the days of Oliver Twist.
apparently, no.