U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Mark Baisley

80%

20%↓

10%

(D) Phil Weiser (D) Michael Bennet (R) Victor Marx
50% 50% 20%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

40%

30%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) James Wiley
50%↓

40%↑

10%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

80%↑

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Milat Kiros

(D) Wanda James

70%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Dwayne Romero

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) Ron Hanks

50%↓

35%↑

30%↓

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

80%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

53%↓

48%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Mel Tewahade

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%↑

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

[wpdreams_ajaxsearchlite]
January 04, 2011 07:52 PM UTC

Education Reform Sides Shifting?

One of the more contentious pieces of legislation passed in last year’s session of the Colorado Assembly was an ambitious education reform plan, Senate Bill 191, the “Great Teachers and Leaders” bill. Passed in the hope that it would make the state better prepared to receive competitive “Race to the Top” federal funds, the bill split Democrats between reform-minded legislators and supporters of teachers, who didn’t believe that the bill had the right targets or motivations–not to mention the dire state of education funding in Colorado. And Colorado, for a host of Byzantine reasons, didn’t get the extra federal money regardless.

But SB-191’s teacher effectiveness standards are still the law, and all parties have moved on to implementation–recommendations from a study committee are expected this spring. And this is where the sides seem to have changed a little according to sources: the Colorado Education Association is now said to be in general agreement with the principal backer of SB-191, Sen. Michael Johnston, on the details of implementing a teacher evaluation system. Johnston and the CEA are reportedly increasingly at odds with the Colorado Association of School Executives (CASE) and the Colorado Association of School Boards (CASB), with the dispute essentially boiling down to a strong statewide standard for evaluations, which Johnston and the CEA prefer, versus a potentially much weaker “local standards” based system that CASE, CASB, and traditional right-leaning education reform groups favor.

What sources say today is the objections from teachers were not to a standards-based system for tenure and evaluation of teachers in the abstract, but trying to ensure that standards were administered fairly and consistently–and adequately funded. Now that the process has moved on to implementation, it’s important to understand how these former adversaries now have pretty closely aligned goals. To be distinguished from the old-school public education antagonists who also supported SB-191, but in the end for very different reasons than Sen. Johnston.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about Donald Trump

Posts about Rep. Gabe Evans

Posts about Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about the Colorado House

Posts about the Colorado Senate


44 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!