2010's Top Story: Inside a Broken Wave

30 Comments

by: Colorado Pols

Across the country, the 2010 election will be recorded as an historic defeat for the Democratic Party. From the sweeping wins in state legislatures we discussed earlier for the GOP to the biggest loss for Democrats in the U.S. House in many decades, these midterm elections saw the usual trend of a new President’s first midterm going badly for his party magnified, with a few notable exceptions, into a rout.

That the state of Colorado was one of those exceptions is the result of well over a year of hard work by highly dedicated Democratic campaign staff raising funds and chasing ballots, combined with key individual scandals that broke up the Republican ticket just enough for Democrats to pull out something they can call a victory here. That Democrats were able to win in the highest-profile statewide races, namely U.S. Senate and the governor’s race, but lose three other less prominent statewide contests, shows where Democrats were able to stave off through pugnacity and timely investment their “wave” backed opponents–and where they weren’t.

But above all, the GOP in Colorado blew the greatest opportunity for a sweeping victory that they had since they began losing elections here in 2004. For a host of reasons including the ongoing economic recovery, the fading of recent polarizing battles over economic recovery spending and health reform from memory, and an aging, in many cases already-beaten bench of contenders for high office, the Colorado GOP’s best opportunity to start undoing the long-term damage done to its prospects in recent years was this year; and they failed to take advantage.

Reacting desperately to their failure to thrive on the national “wave” that resulted in wipeouts for Democrats all around the nation, Colorado Republicans pushed every chip in the center of the table in 2010, and we believe it’s going to cost them at the polls in future elections. Republicans alienated Latinos, the fastest-growing bloc of voters in the United States, with Tom Tancredo, and women with Ken Buck. Internal strife, fault lines that trace back to the battle over 2005’s Referendum C and even before, racked the party from the earliest stages of the primaries.

Republicans bowed to the extremist “Tea Party” to win primaries and chase the myth of their influence, and they made insane claims and promises that they cannot possibly keep in the process–like Scott Tipton’s “plan” to cut the government in half, and Walker Stapleton’s blatherings about schools “competing with prisons” for funds. They elected some positively crazy new people in the legislature like Kathleen Conti; who are going to feed material to the Democrats for as long as they are in office, and who they may come to regret lending their brand.

2010 served as a powerful validator of the reasons we’ve been giving for years that success has eluded the GOP: in Colorado, Republicans could win; and have won in past elections by running moderate, trustworthy candidates who don’t seek office on a platform of tearing the civic institutions of this state to the ground. But instead, the GOP in this state has veered toward thoughtless ideologues and wedge-issue obsessed embarrassments in recent years, while Democrats have been able to present themselves as responsible (and restrained) leaders who are serious about governing–and protecting the basic things everybody values. Things that will make even the most fickle and impressionable voter stop and think.

Unless that changes–and it hasn’t since Democrats started winning elections in Colorado a little over six years ago, with the GOP only moving farther right in response–the result will not.

30 thoughts on “2010’s Top Story: Inside a Broken Wave”

bjwilson83 says:

January 1, 2011 at 10:49 am

I’d say things went pretty good for the GOP. We won ALL of the state offices except the senate and governor’s races (one wasn’t a real race, the other was pretty close and Democrats only held on by running the dirtiest, most dishonest campaign in decades), 4 out of 7 congressional seats, and the state house. All in all, it was a good year, and we’re just warming up. As long as Obama is in office, we’ll have no problem winning race after race in the future.

Log in to Reply
1. Aristotle says:
  
  January 1, 2011 at 10:55 am
  
  “We won all the races except the very most important ones which were decided fairly and honestly.” That’s what you meant to say. You’re welcome.
  
  Log in to Reply
  1. Leonard Smalls says:
    
    January 1, 2011 at 12:45 pm
    
    2008 was actually an excellent Republican year in Colorado too. Unless you count Obama. And Udall. And Markey. And all of those legislative races. But those don’t really count either.
    
    Log in to Reply
  2. droll says:
    
    January 1, 2011 at 6:25 pm
    
    So is GOPWhatever. Using candidates’ words on video is despicable. When will we bastards learn!
    
    And the Guv race was dirty, too. And no fault of the GOP, who nominated an idiot (over a long time political figure who is (gasp!) a cheat) and then supported another idiot creating a third party that will undoubtedly end in a complete Dem takeover in two years (do the math on the races – 2-7% taken away screws the GOP in all but two). All. the left’s. fault.
    
    DIRTY!!
    
    Log in to Reply
    1. Aristotle says:
      
      January 1, 2011 at 8:58 pm
      
      If the GOP does it, it’s fair.
      
      If the Dems do the exact same thing, it’s dirty.
      
      Oh, and don’t forget – when your party bosses tell you that you’re going to support someone other than who you nominated (and in his case, fully supported from the get-go), say “Sir yes sir!” and do it like a good little robot.
      
      Log in to Reply
      1. Ralphie says:
        
        January 2, 2011 at 5:37 am
        
        He’s an insignificant pissant who simply doesn’t matter.
        
        Trying to ascribe some sort of organized thought process to the beej is a fool’s errand.
        
        Log in to Reply
2. raymond1 says:
  
  January 2, 2011 at 12:58 am
  
  “We won ALL of the state offices except the senate and governor’s races”
  
  Translation: “Yay, we Republicans won the three of five that were the much, much less important offices, while you won the two much, much more important ones!”
  
  Anyone think the Dems would be happier if we had the opposite — Governor Tancredo and Senator Buck, but keeping democratic the secretary of state, ag, and treasurer seats?
  
  Log in to Reply
  1. bjwilson83 says:
    
    January 2, 2011 at 4:25 am
    
    So we only lost one of them, and that would have been easily been won if we had a good candidate for governor. And the Dem candidates that did win were forced to run on a fiscally conservative platform. So yes, I consider it quite a successful year in Colorado.
    
    Log in to Reply
    1. Aristotle says:
      
      January 2, 2011 at 5:03 am
      
      Nice try. Statewide is what matters, but way to try to make it look better than it actually was. Anything to avoid the obvious implications of the GOP failures to pick up a very vulnerable Dem Senate seat, right?
      
      Log in to Reply
    2. Ralphie says:
      
      January 2, 2011 at 5:39 am
      
      aren’t you?
      
      The university you work for needs to know how exactly much of an embarrassment you are.
      
      Log in to Reply
    3. raymond1 says:
      
      January 2, 2011 at 5:48 am
      
      … so that you get Gov. Tanc & Sen. Buck, while we get SOS, AG, Treas? Unless you’re even stupider than we all thought, the answer surely is “hell yeah,” which means this wasn’t “quite a successful year.”
      
      And even if 2010 wasn’t a total disaster for the Rs in CO, they got a net loss in CO in a year when every other goddamn state of the union saw an R tide (except some hard blue states like NY, DE, etc.).
      
      Log in to Reply
  2. BlueCat says:
    
    January 2, 2011 at 10:17 pm
    
    No more than anyone with a few brain cells thinks Wadham’s prefers what he got to getting a Governor and a Senator (yes I know Senate is federal level but let’s be real here). Anyone think they weren’t hoping to do much better in the state leg than a skin of the teeth majority in one chamber in an election in which other purple state R parties did so much better without breaking a sweat?
    
    Think Wadhams is a big star to the GOP off this last election? I suppose Beej does. Everyone else has probably noticed that Wadhams isn’t exactly being hailed as the conquering hero and Colorado isn’t in the news as one of the places where the GOP scored its most breathtaking successes.
    
    Log in to Reply
    1. droll says:
      
      January 2, 2011 at 11:23 pm
      
      “The GOP’s greatest victory in Colorado this year was White resigning. Anyone who thinks otherwise doesn’t know how this state actually works.”
      
      I have a fairly good idea of how, so I’d assume the taking of our House is the victory. She doesn’t have faith in McNulty to come through with the votes.
      
      Log in to Reply
    2. Ralphie says:
      
      January 3, 2011 at 1:43 am
      
      Beej doesn’t think.
      
      Log in to Reply
      1. BlueCat says:
        
        January 3, 2011 at 9:52 am
        
        Log in to Reply
reubenesp says:

January 1, 2011 at 4:00 pm

Not a good sign for the Republican Party in Colorado, especially as the state faces huge budget shortfalls.

The end of transfer payments to the states under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the stimulus bill) spell draconian cuts to Colorado’s budget.

Already, the state on Friday told counties to slash the already meager benefits for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Aid to the Needy Disabled (AND), Aid to the Blind (AB) and Old Age Pension (OAP). Funding of homeless programs and food pantries have been slashed as well.

Massive reductions in public education funding and the possible privatization of CU loom in 2011.

How will the new state legislature and the new governor respond? I don’t think most Coloradans will appreciate Republican obstructionism in such dire circumstances.

Log in to Reply
1. DavidThi808 says:
  
  January 1, 2011 at 5:14 pm
  
  They will get a good share of the blame as the government has to cut additional programs. That might force a real discussion of taxes vs services in this state – where the Republicans actually speak honestly on it.
  
  Hey I can hope…
  
  Log in to Reply
  1. Ralphie says:
    
    January 1, 2011 at 6:04 pm
    
    They always do. Calling for program-specific cuts is too risky.
    
    It’s political chickenshit compared to actually standing up and saying which groups of people to piss off, but it works for them.
    
    Log in to Reply
    1. bjwilson83 says:
      
      January 1, 2011 at 10:22 pm
      
      Across the board cuts sounds like a reasonable budget solution to me in tough times when everybody is cutting back.
      
      Log in to Reply
      1. Ralphie says:
        
        January 2, 2011 at 6:54 am
        
        Is not necessarily reasonable.
        
        Log in to Reply
        
        droll says:
        
        January 2, 2011 at 6:59 am
        
        is kind of interesting. I’m glad that BJ supports the GEO, K-12, prisons, and roads equally.
        
        Log in to Reply
        
        Ralphie says:
        
        January 2, 2011 at 7:07 am
        
        I would be glad, too.
        
        Log in to Reply
2. The realist says:
  
  January 1, 2011 at 6:17 pm
  
  the Republicans will be focused on more important issues than the state budget, like undocumented immigrants, the names of House committees (it was exceedingly important to remove “human services” and “labor” from those names), etc.
  
  Log in to Reply
  1. HikingTheAppalachianTrail says:
    
    January 1, 2011 at 11:27 pm
    
    focusing on the critical gay marriage issue.
    
    Log in to Reply
    1. raymond1 says:
      
      January 2, 2011 at 5:50 am
      
      but hey, I get it: it’s not YOU being screwed, so all’s ok, right? typical
      
      Log in to Reply
      1. HikingTheAppalachianTrail says:
        
        January 2, 2011 at 6:52 am
        
        Log in to Reply
        
        droll says:
        
        January 2, 2011 at 6:57 am
        
        So yeah, I guess it is. Just ask a nice interracial couple married in say… about 1968.
        
        Log in to Reply
        
        The realist says:
        
        January 2, 2011 at 1:31 pm
        
        married a man from Hawaii. They had to travel to Kansas and get married there in a civil ceremony. Their marriage was viewed as interracial which was not allowed in Missouri at the time.
        
        Log in to Reply
        
        Aristotle says:
        
        January 2, 2011 at 7:12 am
        
        What do YOU call it, then?
        
        Log in to Reply
  2. Craig says:
    
    January 2, 2011 at 12:36 am
    
    The most important issue since slavery, abortion. It’s a genocide you know. Besides, women should be barefoot and pregnant and shouldn’t complain about rape, because they had buyer’s remorse.
    
    Log in to Reply