CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 31, 2009 08:20 PM UTC

BREAKING: Penry Won't Run for Re-Election

  • 51 Comments
  • by: ClubTwitty

(Updated, with poll… – promoted by ClubTwitty)

Breaking news just up at the Sentinel:


Penry won’t seek re-election to state Senate; his future unclear

State Sen. Josh Penry will not seek re-election to the Colorado Senate, the Republican Grand Junction lawmaker confirmed today.

Penry, who recently dropped out of a bid for the GOP nomination for governor, confirmed in an email to the Daily Sentinel that he was now telling friends and family that the 2010 session would be his last.

He offered no word yet on what his future plans would be.

The announcement clears the way for Rep. Steve King, R-Grand Junction, to seek his seat, and a slew of candidates who are vying to replace King in the Colorado House.

Now the speculation begins–what is the story behind the story?

UPDATE-From the Denver Post:

State Senate Minority Leader Josh Penry won’t run for re-election next year, but will serve out the final year of his term.

The Grand Junction Republican plans to help one-time rival Scott McInnis with his gubernatorial campaign, and help fellow Republicans take back the legislature.

One attribute always connected to Josh Penry has been ambition.  I heard it about Josh before he worked for Congressman Scott McInnis…’This is a guy to watch.’

He was first elected to the state House in 2004, then won a state Senate seat in 2006. As a freshman senator, he played a crucial role in education and energy legislation, which is one reason his colleagues elected him the GOP minority leader.

Penry was following his path to power as apparently planned, but something changed.

Penry announced his campaign for governor in the summer, but unexpectedly dropped out in November, saying he feared a nasty GOP primary would make it easier for Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter to win re-election and harder for Republicans to win legislative seats.

Earlier this week, Penry shot down rumors he would be McInnis’ running mate, saying he’s never been interested in being lieutenant governor. He said then he wants to help a new governor “shape and execute an agenda after the election.”

Josh Penry has decided not to run for re-election because...

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

51 thoughts on “BREAKING: Penry Won’t Run for Re-Election

    1. …he was far from being the worst right wing idiot state senator.  

        Renfroe, Schultheis, Lundberg, Cadman, and Brophy easily beat Penry for that title.  In fact, they make him look pretty vanilla.

  1. This probably means the end of Sen. Penry’s political career. The nature of politics is such that in two years no one will remember him.

    It will be interesting to see how he handles his last session in the state senate. Will he be reasonable or politically silly?

    1. Josh will never stop running for office. He is young, energetic, ambitious, and like it or not, his rhetoric reflects the beliefs of a significant number of Coloradans. He isn’t done. He’ll be back, tanned, rested, and ready …

      1. but it sure seems like something happened, that none of us knows about, that knocked Sen. Penry not only out of the governors race but out of politics altogether. I suspect he may not have had the backing of his family which always puts a handicap on any politician. In that kind of situation, politicians have to make very difficult choices between ambition and what those closet to them want in life. Again, this is pure speculation on my part. I certainly don’t have any inside information.  

      2. There is always a place for young, smart hard working people in politics. When peoople say the GOP does not have a bench I dont get it. A bench is a bench–even if youk dont agree with it.

    2. He’ll never allow himself to be out of the limelight.  Look at how he’s dominated the press since dropping out of the governor’s race.

      In chess, a “gambit” is an opening in which a player sacrifices one or more minor pieces in order to win something else of greater value.

      If you don’t think this is a gambit, you don’t know Penry.

        1. although I take R36’s to also mean that there may be something less noble than family pulling him out (which could be Mesa State patronage position as some have suggested) or the gambit that Ralphie proposes.

          In either case I suppose R36 is right as far as the reason Sen. Penry will give, and he’ll need to say something soon.

          1. just wasn’t supportive of his political career. In the past I worked on one campaign where the candidate should have easily won the general election but didn’t because his spouse never wanted a political life and was against his bid for elected office. If a candidate’s family is not suportive, the candidate almost always looses. But, again, I don’t have any inside information. I’ve never met Sen. and Mrs. Penry and don’t have any idea how she felt about his political career.

            In general, this situation really is odd. He was a politician experiencing a meteoric rise in Republican politics and within the short span of less than two months he has terminated his political future (or so it seems to me). In those circumstances his public explanations just don’t ring true.

    3. Consider that Roy Romer lost and came back, that Ed Perlmutter was out for a few years and seems to have done all right…that sort of list could go on and on.  McInnis wins and Josh has a cabinet post.  If not, he makes some money and picks another battleground down the road.

  2. I can not confirm anything enough to repeat, but the pattern fits.

    I suspect he is out of electoral politics, though he will remain in the political world.

        1. That remains to be seen. I would think they would keep him, just because whatever prep they’ve been putting in for the next session was through him as minority leader.

          However, it would be within the rights of the GOP caucus to remove him, though I don’t know what the procedure for that would be. I think if he didn’t want to resign from the leadership positions he holds, he wouldn’t have to.

        2. It shows you what a gelding the Mesa County Democratic Party is.  They haven’t yet fielded a candidate for Senate.  If they had fielded a strong candidate, there would be a reason for Penry to step down, let a vacancy committee appoint King to fill Penry’s term, and let King run as an incumbent Senator.

          But as usual, the Mesa County Dems put no pressure whatsoever on their opponents.

          And Josh will stay on in leadership where he can spend the term being a splinter under Ritter’s fingernail.

  3. Sarah Palin resigned part way into her first term, wrote a book and made a fortune and has had all the press and political attention she could ask for.

    Senator Penry is just earlier and faster than she was.

    1. made a comfortable living working for the oil and gas industry while he was in the legislature. Why can’t Penry do the same? There’s more to his withdrawals than this.

    2. The odds on him working for oil are pretty solid. I’d give it 2:1 right now.

      He’s still young with a new family and has time to make some coin and jump back into the political game with good name recognition. This is a smart move on his part – a little better than getting spanked in a republican primary and retiring off into the unknown.

      Mr. Penry wins this round for sure. Congrats.  

  4. suicidal teabaggers out there tonight.  Me, I’ll be celebrating with a big smile!  Maybe free drinks all night for anyone who could make it here before midnight.  My D friends are estatic!

  5. Forgot he said he wanted to

    help a new governor “shape and execute an agenda after the election.”

    when he pulled the plug on Lt Gov rumors.

    Maybe he’s a McInnis staffer at heart …

      1. But how’s he supposed to “shape and execute an agenda” in 2011 if he’s given up his Senate seat?

        Three possibilities:

        1. Oil and gas lobbyist (or trade assn. chief or whatever)

        2. State party chairman (Wadhams has got to retire sometime)

        3. The things Penry says about why he’s doing what he’s doing aren’t true

  6. is that he knows he is screwed as a Republican because Ritter is going to rally and win a second term and the Democrats are going to hold onto the legislature so he is destined to continue to be an irrelevant ranter.  Why spend the next four years making 40-50 thousand as a legislator when you aren’t going to be able to push the culture wars back to the top of the state government agenda.  How boring it must be Penry to actually have to grapple with economic issues instead of gay marriage.  If he was in control then by golly the gays would be put on notice.  As it is his culture war rantings are the stuff of amusement.  This theory holds that he is astute enough to see the writing on the wall and know that he would still be a back bencher after the elections in 2010.

    1. I think the Gov. is the most vulnerable of Dem. politicians in CO this cycle.  

      Bennet would be, but I think the GOP primary will take care of that.  

      I think McInnis does better against the Gov than Penry would have, but doesn’t excite the Tea Baggin’ base.  On the other hand, the Dem base is not too excited about the Gov right now either, although depending how McInnis courts the Tea Party fringe, and how the 527s/c4s play, that could change.

      How aggressively the GOP goes after the O&G regulations and other Ritter initiatives in the state house, ballot measures, and the like can all influence this dynamic too.

      I think that something lurks which has given Penry serious cold feet about running for anything.  

      1. Ritter continues to look like a pragmatic adult compared to the adolescent behavior of the Republicans.  He might have all the charisma of stale donuts but my impression is that he diligently works on the issues and isn’t afraid to step on partisan toes, Republican or Democrat, to get things done.

        I read somewhere that a big oil company is getting ready to put a bunch of rigs on the western slope.  An improving economy, higher prices for oil which would stimulate more exploration would absolutely shell Republican negative ads claiming that Ritter policies are anti-business.

        He is holding his own against these crazy extremists while working to ramp up green industries and McLobbyist is going to look more sleazy as the race heats up.  I wouldn’t count Ritter out at all and I’m guessing Penry knows it too.  The guy bailed before Custer rides out for the Little Big Horn.  There is an age old saying regarding software project management to reward the uninvolved.  Penry is expecting to be around to pick up the pieces when everything goes south for the Republicans in 2010.  Such great expectations dashed by a stale donut.  Who would of thunk it.

        1. but I wouldn’t count him in yet either.  

          The long term (through 2010) price of natgas (what they drill for on the Western Slope) doesn’t look that high although activity is picking up some.  

          Still most companies that are planning projects are proceeding fairly moderately, even those that are ramping back up a little.  

        2. With the Denver Post and Dean Singleton still hating Ritter for allowing state employees the right to collective bargaining, I expect to see a lot of stories about how bad things are in the state.  McInnis will get kid glove treatment and there is always Karen Crummy to do Singleton’s dirty work with some hit pieces.

          I just wanted to throw out an alternative universe theory and the possibility that it isn’t inevitable that McInnis will be the ONE the Republicans are looking for (tip of the hat to the Matrix movies).

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

208 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!