U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line
(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 20, 2016 12:14 PM UTC

Post reporter stands out for asking predatory lender about Colorado profits

  • 10 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

(Credit where due – Promoted by Colorado Pols)

loanshark2A predatory-lending bill, allowing lenders to make more money on high-interest loans, passed a state senate committee yesterday, with supporters of the bill telling reporters that increased profits are necessary to keep personal-loan lenders in Colorado.

That’s the major argument for the bill. Specifically, backers told the Durango Herald that the one company offering such loans will leave Colorado if it’s not allowed to make millions more here.

The Denver Post’s Joey Bunch was the only reporter to ask Springleaf Holdings, Colorado’s only lender of personal loans (after a merger last year with its competitor), how the company was doing. I mean, that’s the key question.

Is it struggling to make ends meet, like many of the folks it lends money to are? People who pay the company 36 percent interest on a $1,000 loan as it is?

Bunch reported:

Phil Hitz, who represented Springleaf Holdings, acknowledged that the company is very profitable nationally and confirmed the 30 percent Colorado growth over the past four years.

Bunch apparently didn’t ask Hitz if Springleaf would leave Colorado if the bill didn’t pass, but all indications are that it would not.

Last year, when a similar predatory-lending bill was debated, the Colorado Attorney General’s office testified that access to such loans is not threatened under the current interest-rate structure.  Similar testimony was reportedly offered yesterday as well.

So the bill’s backers haven’t refuted the key point that lenders of personal loans are profitable and thriving. In fact, the market in Colorado is actually growing. There’s no indication that the lenders will walk away from Colorado and its money.

To be fair, Hitz told Bunch that Colorado is the company’s lowest yielding state, and other states help subsidize it.

But lowest yielding state compared to what, astronomically-earning ones? We know the company is “very profitable” nationally. So the fact that it’s doing well enough in Colorado is a signal that states should protect consumers, many of them low-income, and adopt Colorado’s humane regulatory framework.

That’s another conversation reporters might have with Hitz.

Tweet
Share

Comments

10 thoughts on “Post reporter stands out for asking predatory lender about Colorado profits”

  3. A Ray Scott sponsored bill in front of a Finance Committee majority of Tim Neville, Owen Hill, and Chris Holbert to increase Hitz's overlords’ usurious profits (a lobbyist's wet dream, eh?)   …

    … I predict that if Speaker Hullinghorst doesn't assign this to a House kill committee, this pig-bill passes.  

    (Hick' won't veto this this election year, his stated objection last year was the rushed process.)

    1. I hope your predictions are wrong. There are loan sharks taking advantage of low income earners primarily. This is ugly. I truly hope Hickenlooper will veto this bill if it passes. If not, Hickenlooper will look like a two-faced idiot who helped create a recovery center at Fort Lyons but screwed over poor families and individuals with this bill. And yes, I do realize that some of these people are drug abusers, but others are just trying to pay rent and put food on the table for their families. So, Governor let's help the families… it's really tough out here in the real world. Or Hick, are a shark too?

    2. Seriously, though….I have always called it "supermarket politics". You may have heard me say something about one of the DLC types listening to their corporate friends. I say that because that is how politics works. There is some aspect of Representative Meltons' private life (a friend, relative, etc.) that puts him in a position to invoke the powerful "suspension of disbelief" principle and do something that is anathema to his purported mission or world view at the behest of someone whom he trusts implicitly.

      I have met a number of legislators and politicians who use this principle…notably my favorite hypocrite, Governor John Frackenlooper. The inherent denial associated with his claim of drinking "fracking fluid" is so obvious it takes a very powerful bond with those in his trust circle.

      1. I won't argue about the influence of industry money on pols, but the reason I believe that Rep. Melton (and 31 of his Democratic colleagues, if I'm doing the math right) voted last year and will likely vote this year to support this bill is that it's something they can focus on without having to do the real, hard work necessary to create an alternative.

        Bridge lending in poor communities is a necessity.  Many of these folks lack the level of income or savings necessary to weather significant life events (car breaks down, medical bills, etc.) and can borrow only in amounts that aren't sufficiently lucrative for banks and credit unions to take the business.  To actually fix this, the government would need to create real income supports or to establish and fund some form of CDFI (community development financial institution) that could bank and lend to these communities on more reasonable terms.  Both of those are hard.  Giving loan sharks another ounce and a half of flesh is easy, and avoids the condition where they put the only lenders who will play out of business, while also allowing them to ignore the need for real solutions.

        There are some glimmers of hope. It's important to remember, if you read the article, that payday loans in other states have 200-300 percent interest.  The loans referenced in the article run from 25-36%, but are also repaid over a year with automatic withdrawals from borrower paychecks, financial planning advice,

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

59 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!