Fake Reporter Art Kane Back With Another Bogus Story

Art Kane.

Art Kane.

Local freelance “journalist” Art Kane came under heavy criticism last year after writing a series of news articles for the Denver Post that inaccurately disparaged the rollout of the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a Obamacare, in Colorado. And these weren’t small inaccuracies, either, but wild factual exaggerations and totally unsubstantiated hearsay horror stories that fell apart under casual scrutiny.

Since then, Kane has taken up with a “news” outlet much better suited to his particular brand of hackery: the conservative Watchdog.org website run by the Franklin Center for Public Integrity. The stories may not be any more accurate–but Kane’s new bosses aren’t concerned with, you know, accuracy.

Today’s Art Kane feature story on per diem pay for Colorado state legislators at Colorado Watchdog is an excellent case in point:

Colorado lawmakers who live outside the metro area will get a bump in their per diem next session, making that state’s reimbursements the second highest in the country and costing taxpayers an additional $35,000 next year…

The per diem rate for lawmakers living outside the metro area will go up to $195 a day next session; state law sets it at 85 percent of the federal government per diem for the Denver Metro area, which also increased this year. The cost to taxpayers is an additional $35,000 a year, legislative staff wrote in an email exchange with Watchdog.org.

Colorado Union of Taxpayers president Gregory Golyansky said he was upset when he learned from last week’s Watchdog.org story the per diem expenses cost taxpayers so much money, and that raising the costs next year isn’t appropriate.

Gregory Golyansky.

Gregory Golyansky.

Setting aside Colorado Union of Taxpayers president Gregory Golyansky’s major credibility problems, with which our readers are very well acquainted, there’s a very large part of the story of this increase in per diem that Art Kane isn’t telling you:

National Conference of State Legislatures data shows the increase will skyrocket Colorado to the second highest per diem after Alaska, which pays lawmakers $235 a day if they live outside the capital area…

This year, Kentucky, Alaska and Tennessee had higher per diems, but Colorado will surpass those states unless their per diem rates increase. Expensive states such as Hawaii, New York and California reimbursed their lawmakers less than Colorado, NCSL data shows. [Pols emphasis]

As we read this story claiming that “expensive states” like Hawaii, New York, and California “reimbursed their lawmakers less than Colorado,” we remembered something very important: in Colorado, legislators don’t even make enough to survive. Here’s what the National Conference of State Legislatures really says about the salaries of lawmakers in the states listed above:

Base Salary

California: $90,526 per year
Hawaii: $57,852 per year
New York: $79,500 per year
Colorado: $30,000 per year [Pols emphasis]

This list doesn’t take into account which of these legislatures are “part time” versus “full time,” but that really doesn’t matter: Colorado legislators routinely draw per diem pay for events they attend throughout the year. Most of our lawmakers in either party will tell you that serving in the Colorado General Assembly is very much a full-time commitment. And that means except for the very young and very rich, it’s a huge financial hardship.

And in terms of their total compensation, which is of course the bottom line, Colorado lawmakers earn a tiny fraction of what legislators in these other states make. And that makes Art Kane’s latest big story…well, another steaming pile of bullshit.

Back in 2012, we were critical of a bill to raise per diem pay for legislators, mostly because at that time state employees had not received a raise in several years due to recession-forced pay freezes. Then-majority House Republicans rushing the bill through with no debate didn’t help the optics either. With that said, there’s no question that pay for lawmakers in Colorado is, at this point, a major disincentive to public service.

If Art Kane would like to write a factual story, perhaps he should start there instead.

11 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. davebarnes says:

    I am up with paying our reps $100K/yr.
    Maybe we would have some middle class legislators.

  2. Andrew Carnegie says:

    Dave:

    I agree their salaries should be raised.

    I was thinking $60,000 or $75,000.

    At some level, you get what you pay for.

  3. Moderatus says:

    Are candidates no longer running because of the pay? Can you find anyone willing to run for office on a platform of raising legislator pay? I think this is just Colorado Pols trying to curry favor with greedy politicians.

    • Colorado Pols says:

      Seriously? The low salary prevents candidates on both sides from even considering the job. 

    • Progressicat says:

      Wasn't it your buddy the Money Badger who couldn't get by on the 68 grand he was being paid to be Secretary of State?

    • Andrew Carnegie says:

      Mod, actually some are not running because of the pay.

      I am not naming names, but I know that to be true.

      • BlueCat says:

        It's the new AC. Since exposing yourself as a moderate centrist I guess it's safe to start making sense, right? Modster will be crushed. 

        Very true that not everyone can afford to devote so much time to something that doesn't pay enough to support themselves and help support their families. It's not as if there are a lot of well paying jobs out there available for only those months the legislature isn't in session and willing to put up with only part of  an employee's time and attention the rest of the year. The lower the pay the more likely only the privileged will apply.

      • Moderatus says:

        Even if that's true, and I suppose it could be, fat chance of it ever becoming a winning political issue.

        • BlueCat says:

          That's not the point. The main point is…. another bogus Kane story. No surprise you don't want to address that.

          A secondary point is the reality that the unusually low (not high) level of compensation makes it very difficult for people who can't afford to take considerable time off from making a living for themselves and their families to serve. But, of course, that's the way you righties like it. Keeps the political power concentrated where you think it belongs and out of the hands of he riff raff which is anyone who needs to make a living off paychecks. You probably don't want to address that either.

  4. itlduso says:

    I expect to see this as a front page story in the Denver Post by Arthur Kane, "special to the Denver Post".  Boy, did I hate those ridiculous Obamacare stories that he penned.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.