President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 24, 2007 12:09 AM UTC
9 Comments
That is the first thing I have heard you say (write) since you started posting here.
I for one voted for Perot becuse I did not like either other candidate. I knew it was throwing away my vote but there was always the long shot chance.
And for the record, Dave’s election atlas is a great source. I swear, I can read that page for hours
If Dr. Dobson makes good on his threat and runs someone like Sam Brownback as a third party, Right-to-Life candidate against Hillary and Rudy, 1992 could happen all over again. Or am I just dreaming?
But Dave’s analysis is absolutely correct. As much as I respect and admire Bill Clinton as the best president we’ve had since F.D.R., he only carried the western states courtesy of Ross Perot.
One thing that Hillary will have is greater Latino voter turnout in the southwest, esp. thanks to Tom Tancredo’s efforts to energize that base for her.
I’ve came across more than a couple newspaper articles over the last few days that report evangelical leaders are rallying around Romney to blunt Giuliani. I think that the Dobson type leaders are going to try and get someone-anyone-other than Giuliani to win the nomination. If that’s the case, Dobson would be the odd man out to support a third party candidate
as just full enough of his own crap that he would try to go it alone in backing a third party candidate. If so, we’d get to see how much power he really wields with the social cons.
BTW, is there anything wrong with Huckabee (from a social con POV, or more specifically an evangelical one) that they don’t try to boost him? I thought his credentials there were impeccable in comparison to the GOP frontrunners (e.g, no pro choice comments on the record or other “liberal” positions). Is it just because he’s so far back in the field?
Or lack thereof. I think that Schaffer raised more than Huckabee did, and that’s not a good sign for Huckabee.
Also, I’ve heard things about how “Huckabee supported tax increases”, but who knows if that’s true or not. But even if it was, I think the major issue with Huckabee is his lack of fundraising, and slow reaction to capitalize on events that go his way
But most of the tax increases were actually revenue neutral (he cut other taxes) and were actually an attempt at tax simplification.
If I were a social conservative I would be all over Huckabee. I think the guy has real integrity–probably explains why he can’t raise money from traditional GOP sources. (Just kiddin)
I think if he had the resources to communicate his message he’d be in good shape
The “Latino Vote” is more imagination than distinct. Latinos that vote, which is disappointingly small, vote pretty much just like their white Anglo neighbors. Not even a statistical variation.
(Might be not true in TT’s district!)