President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
September 18, 2007 05:55 PM UTC
17 Comments
Guess it might be time to start working on a better argument for supporting Hillary than “My cat would make a better president than any of the Republicans” because that’s about all I’ve got right now in support of corporate lobbyist darling, business as usual, wishy washy on the war Mrs. Clinton. The only change she represents to me is different body parts from those of past presidents.
at least she is not an idiot. I don’t think she represents change, but she is rational. Maybe she is too tied to monied interests, but let’s not go overboard by saying she is just like George Bush.
Hosting an exclusive $1-25K fundraiser in DC with defense industry lobbysts eager to get a piece of the homeland security pie. She’s brought along several Democratic Congresspeople as well for smaller, for-pay “breakout sessions,” so they can talk pork directly with those who vote on it. And then write those big lobbyist checks to Hillary for President.
I don’t think she represents change.
that’s why I oppose Hillary. She doesn’t think the game can change.
unless you start a new game and that doesn’t seem like a good idea to me right now.
“that is why you fail”
There is now point in voting if we can’t change the game.
not the game. The game can only be changed by creating a new government. Now we do have the longest running democracy so maybe we are over due for a good revolt. But as a star wars fan you would probably like to see us blow up the whole thing.
that kind of rules out Hillary doesn’t it? Aftter all she’s the one with all the experience.
Then again on the experience question maybe Laura Bush will run in 2012, after all she has the same white house experience as hillary.
Republicans don’t like their women to be seen, heard, or have a thought.
but as most polls how you are in the very slim minority
In 2000 I knew Colorado would go for Bush by a large margin. I voted American Constitution just so the Dems didn’t think they would get all the non-Bush sentiments and votes.
I can see being in Florida in 2008 (God! No! Please!) and having a similar heavily Republican vote. In such case, I would do the same before voting for Hillary.
OTOH, if the polls show a tight race, I will hold my nose and vote for her.
I was going to say either of my dachshunds would make a better president than any of the Democrats out there.
At least we agree on Clinton being a phony………
I want COMPETENCE, dammit! Is that too much to ask?