President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 25, 2006 12:32 AM UTC
17 Comments
One more reason not to vote for Giuliani in ’08.
Both Ways Bob can join Bernie Kerik on the scrap heap of history.
Giuliani is off his rocker to say BWB is consistent, and he knew of BWB’s mess, for sure. Again, who cares what a New Yorker says about what goes on in Colorado? They got it wrong on the Hamilton Building and Rudi has it wrong on our Gov race.
Giuliani is there to try and shore up Moderate R’s and right leaning U’s who are scared of Beauprez’ 100% rating from the Christian Coalition and equally scared of a blue state with no veto powers. He is probably referring to consistencies in his voting record in Congress, not his campaign foibles.
That should play well with Both Way’s base. He can have it both ways…again.
…..his opinion on Referendum I? or Amendment 43?
Does in anyone in Colorado give two shits about what “former” Mayor Guiliani thinks? If these is his feeble attempt to garner some attempt for a presidential run, it’s going to back fire once Both-Ways-Bob goes down by double digits.
How many other states is he running ads in support of losing candidates?
New Rasmussen Poll:
Ritter: 51%
Flip Flop Bob: 39%
Under the current circumstances, it is amazing that Bill Ritter is having a hard time getting clearly over the 50% mark (still within margin).
Beauprez definitely has a chance to pull this off.
Um, 51-39? Was this a sampling of, oh, ten people?
You sure get creds for optimism. Or something.
Margin of error was likely 4.5%. It takes less than that to move Ritter under 50%.
The point is that despite the beating that Beauprez is taking from the press, Ritter is only breaking even at best.
Keep telling BWB that his CONSISTANCY of being stuck in the thirties percentile is a good thing. We appreciate what you are doing for Democrats.
According to Jennifer Duffy of the Cook Political Report, one of the nation’s most respected political handicappers (and a former RNC official) this race is “a lost cause for the GOP.”
http://www.msnbc.msn…
This could explain why the RNC and the RGA have given up and moved elsewhere – and why BWB had to cough up $50,000 of his own money.
And it’s even more amazaing that Beauprez is having a hard time getting over the 40% mark. Even the default voter registration advantage should have Beauprez in the low-40s. What a joke.
Thanks for destroying the party, Beauprez jackasses.
… because the GOP believes that words are for eliciting conduct rather than for describing states of affairs in the real world. If Rudy’s words pushed the right buttons in a key demo (at this point Beauprez bitter enders) that’s all that counts.
Alexander Pope anticipated Giuliani when he wrote: “Praise undeserved is satire in disguise.”
YO Rudy maybe you ought to get your ass back to NYC and finish the job of finding remains at the WTC.
someone should have briefed him about the issues before he made his endorsement. His citing Beauprez’s “consistency” only draws more attention to the issue of flip-flopping.