President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 29, 2024 12:07 PM UTC

"RiNO Jeff" Hurd Blunders Badly On The Biggest Question There Is

  • 5 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
GOP CO-03 candidate Jeff “You’ve Never” Hurd.

Last Friday, the Denver Post’s John Aguilar profiled the upcoming CO-03 Republican primary, a race that has changed dramatically since the departure of incumbent Rep. Lauren Boebert to run on the other side of the state for re-election after personal and professional scandal put her re-election chances–or even winning the GOP primary against an unknown placeholder candidate Jeff “You’ve Never” Hurd–in jeopardy. Since Boebert’s carpetbagging district switch, two-time Democratic candidate Adam Frisch, who came within 546 voters of taking Boebert out in 2022 and continues to rake in massive amounts of cash even after Boebert bailed from the race, has seized the momentum as he awaits the no-name winner of the June 25th primary.

Boebert’s departure from the CO-03 primary left Hurd in the position of nominal frontrunner for the Republican nomination, but also prompted the entry of other candidates into the race–most notably former state Rep. “Raging” Ron Hanks, who has campaigned alongside Colorado GOP chairman Dave “Let’s Go Brandon” Williams and unapologetically champions the “Big Lie” that Donald Trump should still be President. As the party’s “election integrity” officer, Hanks persuaded a small number of county Republican party chairs to refuse to certify the results of last year’s election. So far, Hanks has had difficulty organizing an effective campaign to match his hard-line rhetoric, but that may change if Hanks picks up the state party’s formal endorsement under controversial new rules allowing them to do so.

In the meantime, as Aguilar reports, Hurd is doing himself no favors trying to appeal to GOP primary voters in this rapidly approaching election:

[Hurd] lists the flow of immigrants across the southern U.S. border in recent years as a “massive political failure” at the top of the issues page of his campaign website. Energy extraction, important in the 27-county 3rd District, is also a priority for Hurd. Those two issues form a nexus between Hurd and former President Donald Trump, who will be the Republican presidential nominee at the top of November’s ballot.

“His top two issues are my top two issues — securing the border and energy independence,” Hurd said.

“Secure the border” and “drill baby drill” are two of the most predictable taglines in Republican politics, especially in an energy-producing region like the Western Slope. These bromides would only be a liability, at least in the primary, if Hurd didn’t recite them. But then, Jeff “You’ve Never” Hurd made a cardinal error, one that for the purposes of the upcoming primary overshadows any stand Hurd has on any particular issue.

Jeff Hurd just gave himself a big Trump problem.

Beyond that, Hurd is tight-lipped about the former president, declining to say even whether he voted for him in the last two elections — “I’m not focused on 2016 and 2020,” he said — or whether he will vote for Trump this fall.

“I don’t talk about who I vote for,” Hurd said. [Pols emphasis]

Folks, no matter which side you’re on, that answer is totally unacceptable in an election cycle defined by Donald Trump’s improbable return to prominence, the Republican Party’s presumptive nominee to become President again. Even CO-08 GOP candidate Gabe Evans, running in a far more competitive district, publicly swore fealty to Donald Trump in order to deny his primary opponents the wedge. Given the way the state party has ripped into insufficiently MAGA-loyal candidates like Jeff Crank in CO-05, we’re legitimately surprised that Hurd has left himself vulnerable to the same friendly fire.

It’s the best chance Ron Hanks is going to get to make the case that he is the candidate CO-03 GOP primary voters want. And it’s a story Jeff Hurd had better hope the famously media self-aware Donald Trump…somehow misses.

Comments

5 thoughts on ““RiNO Jeff” Hurd Blunders Badly On The Biggest Question There Is

    1. 538 does a pretty good job of getting polls, and they don't have any for CO-3 from this year, just two testing Frisch/Boebert from last year.

  1. News flash for Mr Hurd: we are energy independent on paper. We import from our largest provider, Canada. We sell light crude products to Mexico. We buy heavy crude from Venezuela for diesel because we don’t produce enough of that class of crude. We have a Strategic Petroleum Reserve for a reason and we could produce 30% of our liquid fuel needs from agricultural waste. Not unlike our food supplies: we import Canadian, Mexican and South American beef, we export meat abroad (we import even though we produce more meat than we consume).   
     

    These really are simple equations, even if you’re forced to use Arabic numbers. 

  2. These days, I think the only people in Colorado who would be considered "dependent" on energy are those addicted to drilling and fracking. 

    The "conservative" thought I grew up with was to leave places as if I had never been there and not be a burden on others.  I wish the Colorado energy exploiters would be that conservative. 

    1. Devoutly to be wished, John, but unlikely at best, I trow. In the ten years or so of my involvement in “rasslin'” with the OilyBoyz, I do not recall any instance of such behavior.

      In fact, it was early on I discovered the perversion so fundamental to understanding the dominant narrative driving their activities. When I began to get to know the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, I was dumbfounded to learn the word “conservation” did not mean what I thought it did. 

      To the OilyBoyz, its meaning is perverted to mean, not the saving of the resource, but the maximizing of the severance tax benefit (which they contrive to not really, actually pay) to Colorado taxpayers, by not leaving a drop in the ground, thus conserving the value of the resource for Coloradans.This is their statutory imperative, by which they justify their rapacious appetite for profits.

      The deals worked out by the governors’ office and the legislature usually sound good, but do not stand scrutiny. 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

86 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!