President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 12, 2006 06:14 AM UTC

i love bob beauprez

  • 5 Comments
  • by: Moonshill

but dont worry all you people celebrating national coming out week, its in a completely heterosexual way! yay for bob, steamrolling to victory!

Comments

5 thoughts on “i love bob beauprez

  1. but I definately think he will be better for us than a DA from a second rate city with a half ass record.
    I voted for BB as did my wife. We also voted for Lamborn down here.
    My hopes is that even though I voted my conscience, I sincerely hope doing so pisses off many on this lefty site.

  2. I just saw the Ritter ad blasting BB last night, and it blows him away.

    How anyone who thinks for himself can support a partyline social issues radical is beyond me, and a lot of other voters this year.

    Your misery is just beginning. Pour soul.

    1. Do you mean the ad about proposed tax increases?  The ad about those tax proposals could be effective, I guess, but it’s sad that everything that the campaign says has to be 30 seconds long.

      There are very good reasons why all those tax proposals of Beauprez’s are horrible ideas, but that advertisement doesn’t (and can’t) accurately represent any of them.  As it is, the ad will be easy to refute; all Beauprez has to do is point out that he intends his proposals to be revenue-neutral.  Practically no one will ever find out that they really wouldn’t be revenue-neutral, or that they would subsidize SUV ownership at the expense of condemning anyone who can’t even afford a car to greater economic hardship, or any of the other reasons that Americans ought to be outraged that Beauprez would associate his name with such stupidity.

      Alas, that’s the way life works.  Nevertheless, this is the first Ritter spot that I’m not happy with.  It just feels dishonest.

      1. gas and groceries wouldn’t be get the tax under Bob’s idea.  Not sure how SUV’s fit in, except they would attract more taxes than a cheaper car.  Nice try though. 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

36 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!