President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 03, 2006 05:27 PM UTC
13 Comments
Excellent investigating and reporting by the Rocky there. Beauprez is going to have a Very Hard Time explaining this one away, methinks. The trail is clear, and it leads to the Trailhead (Group).
How so?
Beauprez’s campaign didn’t purchase the history, but Trailhead did. You don’t magically come up with that information out of the blue…
these cases were common knowledge among many in GOP circles. Furthermore, they are public record. Not really a stretch there.
This is the campaign of idiots (or at least JV players). Anytime anything of worth comes from that campaign, it certainly needs to be the by-product of someone or something else.
Besides, why should we expect the campaign to do their own oppo research? They don’t even do their own polling or ID work…
What is considered coordination? If all the R groups hire the same attorney, is that coordination? I guess if it looks like coordination and reeks of coordination, its just a coincidence?
Grueskin. He seems to represent every Democrat.
Don’t know about the charges of illegal coordination. It looks to me that Ritter is playing the Slick Willy game of trying change the subject from “I did not aide and abet Mexican criminals” to “BWB is breaking silly campaign laws.”
While I support Ritter, I don’t like his lawyerly slipperyness on this issue.
Looks like 17th street snake oil to me.
Yeah, and BB’s such a straight shooter !
You think that Beauprez himself breaking the law NOW is less important than Ritter prosecuting and convicting people of felonies in the past? That logic sounds more slick than anything.
the law’s the law. There’s no such thing as civil disobedience when it comes to campaign law – at least not if they’re doing it under cover of darkness.
It’ll be really interesting to see how Both Ways conducts himself during this debate. Given his deficit in the polls, he’ll have to be aggressive and hit Ritter hard.
But any candidate doing that has to be skillful otherwise he (or she) comes across as looking desperate. Remember Jimmy Carter in ’80 with Reagan’s come back line, “Now there you go again!” Or Anne Richards running against the Shrub in ’94.
I don’t know if Both Ways has the experience or the smarts to pull this off.
In one of the few areas Bob has scored more points with the majority, to this point, has been in the debates. He has been working over BR.
It would benefit Bob greatly if there were a televised debate per night.