Former state Sen. turned ubiquitous GOP political operative Greg Brophy is incensed that Democrats are likening two Republicans in a campaign mailer–two Republicans who Brophy claims to support:
In short, Brophy supports both freshman GOP train wreck-a-thon Rep. Lauren Boebert and state house candidate Paul Archer, but Democrats comparing Archer to Boebert directly is “intellectually inept!”
Why do you suppose that is? Is there something about Rep. Boebert’s public image that Brophy doesn’t want associated with Paul Archer’s House run in culturally upscale Centennial? What might that be, specifically? And if there’s something about Boebert so unthinkable when applied to Paul Archer, how can Brophy continue to support Boebert?
We’re not the ones asking you to uncritically accept cognitive dissonance. That’s Brophy.
Why isn’t this a compliment? The floor is open if you want to take a guess.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: joe_burly
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Meiner49er
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: davebarnes
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Brophy knows Boebert is toxic outside the MAGA bubble, but he can never say that.
Why do rodents eat each other when trapped or caged? Why ask why about these vermin?
This is EXACTLY the approach Caraveo should have used against Kirkmeyer.