12 thoughts on “Diaries of a Rubber Stamp #12”

1. Isn’t this kind of muddling your message?  

   Log in to Reply

2. I thought they had to be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and receive the blessing of the Executive Office of the President to fulfill NEPA review requirements.  Correct me if I’m wrong, please.

   If my understanding is correct, than what you are actually implying is that the USACE would take advice from Congress, regardless of impact and that President is not convinced, making this “rubber stamp” unsure, too.  Meaning that your dumbass joke is, well, dumb.  Least of all because yet another joke pointed toward the armed services in any way will just remind the vets here.  Good luck with that.

   OR you didn’t bother to research anything and instead picked a random bit of a debate to make some kind of faux point.  Sorry, not you so much as Buck’s campaign.  But research before statement has never been his strong point… according to you.  Funny how that works.

   Log in to Reply

3. Conclusive proof BJ is really just a creepy alternate personality for a liberal democrat named David Chestnut: http://www.coloradopols.com/di…

   David, I hope that when the Nice Folks In White Coats come for you and try to resolve your split personalities, they help you realize that David Chestnut was who you really have been all along, and this creepy “BJ Wilson” is just a disturbed alternate personality that arose from some suppressed trauma that can be cured promptly.

   David, in the interest of furthering the effort to cure you of this BJ personality, I will be calling you David C from now on — to reinforce the man you should be, not the too-creepy-to-be-real personality you’ve been displaying here. David, welcome back to the world after years of suppression of your identity by your creepy alternate personality!

   Log in to Reply

   1. An homage to modern American ingenuity:

      http://www.trucknutz.com  

      Log in to Reply

      1. If I ever get banned and come back for the next election cycle, I’ll post under ChestNutz. Then only the old timers will know who I am. Although I suppose they would out me again.

         Log in to Reply

         1. Which would mean, you know, that you don’t use any actual identifying information.

            Eh, why bother. We’d recognize your style instantly, like everyone recognized Steve Harvey’s dozens of aliases.

            Log in to Reply

            1. I could use one of his old names just to confuse people.

               Log in to Reply
               1. Log in to Reply

                  1. That’s triguardian squared. Emphasis on the square.

                     Log in to Reply

   2. That’s a liberal agnostic Democrat, mind you.

      Log in to Reply

4. That JeffcoBlue has put to you, dear ol’ Davy Chestnutz.

   1. You have previously said you work, at least in a volunteer capacity, for the Buck campaign. Is this activity sanctioned by the campaign? Is your immediate supervisor at the Buck campaign aware of this activity? Is any other employee or volunteer of the Buck campaign aware of it? Do other volunteers/employees participate?

   2. Do you consider it honest politics to represent yourself as an “agnostic Democrat,” when you clearly are not? Or to imply you support “single payer” health care when you do not?

   3. How could you be so stupid as to use an email address that is readily identifiable? You can plead the 5th on this one.

   Log in to Reply

   1. …with your professed super-Christianity

      Log in to Reply