President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta



CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson



CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd



CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese



CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen



CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore



CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk



CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans



State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 25, 2018 08:42 AM UTC

Gardner's Man In North Dakota: "Even If It’s All True, Does It Disqualify Him?"

  • by: Colorado Pols
President Trump (left) and Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Yuma).

The Washington Post’s Sean Sullivan reports on a radio interview yesterday featuring Rep. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, who is running for the U.S. Senate against incumbent Democratic Sen. Heidi Heitkamp. Cramer drew fire over the weekend after he asserted that the allegation of sexual assault against Brett Kavanaugh leveled by former classmate Dr. Christine Blasey Ford was “absurd” irrespective of its truthfulness since the alleged assault was merely attempted as opposed to successful.

This did not go over well.

As the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) standard bearer in one of the nation’s hottest U.S. Senate races this year, this would have been a really good time to offer a meek clarification, maybe even concede that he might have offended…well, everybody, and found something else to talk about.

But apparently, that’s not Kevin Cramer’s style!

Rep. Kevin Cramer, the Republican nominee for Senate in North Dakota, questioned Monday whether a sexual assault accusation against Brett M. Kavanaugh should disqualify him from the Supreme Court, even if the allegation is true.

Cramer raised the question in a television interview on KX4, a North Dakota station. He also explained that when he said in a radio interview last week that “nothing evidently happened” between Kavanaugh and Ford, he meant that “there was no type of intercourse or anything like that.”

…In the interview with host Chris Berg televised Monday, Cramer said that if something like what California professor Christine Blasey Ford alleges about Kavanaugh is accurate, “it’s tragic, it’s unfortunate, it’s terrible.” But, he added of Kavanaugh, “even if it’s all true, does it disqualify him? It certainly means that he did something really bad 36 years ago, but does it disqualify him from the Supreme Court?” [Pols emphasis]

That’s right, readers. A Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate just suggested that a rapist might not be disqualified from serving on the highest court in the land. The answer to that question by what we believe to be the overwhelmingly majority of Americans would not just be that a rapist is disqualified from serving as a Supreme Court Justice–it should be followed up by a more pointed question about what kind of person would say something so impossibly disrespectful of sexual assault victims.

Who said it? The Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate in North Dakota said it. And while Sen. Cory Gardner, chairman of the NRSC tells local reporters that he “supports” the right of Kavanaugh’s alleged victims to be heard, his charges in the Senate battleground states are singing a very different tune.

In this case, offensive enough that Gardner needs to say something–or let his failure to do so speak volumes.


10 thoughts on “Gardner’s Man In North Dakota: “Even If It’s All True, Does It Disqualify Him?”

  1. An interesting factoid about Mr. Cramer is that the Koch brothers apparently are not providing him with any funding support due to Cramer's support of Trump's tariffs. The Kochs like their free trade.

    1. The Kochs have their bad points, for sure. But they're on the correct side of a whole bunch of issues at the moment with money to back up their positions, and they despise the Screaming Yam. I'm not proud, I'll take it.

  2. If the standard is money, Cramer is hard pressed. commented on the race, saying

    The last fundraising report says the Republican candidate's campaign has brought in just over $3.2 million.

    The GOP tells us, so far, this event alone has brought in a million more dollars.


    Heitkamp has brought in over $10.8 million dollars

    Wonder if Cory has a spare million or two for North Dakota?


    1. This from a guy who contributed to dragging a sexual assault victim who received death threats through the mud. 

      Because an argument over whether or not someone is stealing from a business is on the same level as attempted rape. 

      1. This from the guy who has posted the same broken link on three different threads!

        Good to see that when the GOP hires their trolls, they go for clueless incompetence!

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

26 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!