CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 14, 2009 06:18 AM UTC

Why is the state not serious about the recession

  • 5 Comments
  • by: DavidThi808

Ok, we’re all in agreement that this economy is in a world of hurt. And the state government is in worse shape than most because of TABOR, and the other laws that hamstring what the legislature can do.

But still, the state’s inaction strikes me as the equivilent of just hunkering down and waiting for this to blow over, with maybe the federal stimulus money riding to the rescue.

I’m not denigrating the efforts of the Governor and Legislature as they are all clearly trying. But their entire effort appears to be to operate normally, but with less money.

And yet we could…

1) Where is the effort to make our state government more efficient? That is always step 1 in the private sphere. I don’t see any evidence of this occuring. Where’s the proposed system changes that will enable the state to reduce headcount with no impact on services.

2) Our present drug laws don’t stop use (ask any college student about how easy they are to find). Rather, they put money in the pocket of criminals instead of tax revenue. Why are we not evaluating legalizing and taxing drugs.

3) Our present drug laws also fill the prisons which costs us hundreds of millions a year. Even if we continue to make drugs illegal – why are we locking up the low-level pushers & users?

4) I’m not sure how the K-12 funding law is written, but can we make free education K-14 and wrap funding for the community colleges and 1st 2 years at the 4 year schools into the public schools. This needs to be free regardless and this would bring it into a more secure funding system.

5) The recent supreme court ruling in the mill-level override was pretty broad. Under that ruling we should be looking at what the legislature can do to increase revenue without an election. What springs to mind is ending the tax holiday on severance taxes. And with gas prices so low, the (inaccurate) fear-mongering about it causing a price increase will get no traction.

6) Where’s the legislation to put a tax increase and a capital expendures bond on the November ballot? Yes TABOR means the legislature must ask. So ask. A captial expendures bond makes a lot of sense right now. And I think an increase in the capital gains tax is both called for (the financial markets caused this mess) and would sell.

What bothers me is you don’t see any of the above even being discussed. Yes the economy sucks. Yes TABOR creates severe constraints. But that is no reason to keep operating the same way. Our state needs leaders that will think outside of the box.

Comments

5 thoughts on “Why is the state not serious about the recession

  1. You should write a referendum/amendment. If Kristi Burton can do it, you can.

    I don’t know the specifics of the procedures, but I think it’s too late to get something on the ballot this year. For 2010, though, it would probably be pretty beneficial to have a businessman non-politician promoting some sort of revenue increasing measure.

    If you make it sound half as appealing as you make the pols you interview sound, it’ll win by 40 points.

    That’s it. I’m this close to making a Draft David website.

  2. are always at the top of the list, but I defy you to find it in material amounts.

    One can redouble Medicaid fraud enforcement, and one can step up tax collection efforts, but higher ed dollars are spent by autonomous higher ed institutions, K-12 dollars are spent by autonomous school districts, and corrections efficiencies are both already part of the budget (which includes some big re-entry initiatives) and produce slow results (as existing inmates on long fixed sentences aren’t easily removed from the system).  Regulatory parts of government have very little budgetary impact — many are funded with their own cash funds.

    We already have a hiring freeze in place.

    1. I’m talking about doing things inefficiently. My company sells software that enables organizations to create & revise reports about 20 times faster than the alternative products.

      It’s not that using the previous system that group was engaging in fraud, waste, or abuse. They were working as efficiently as they could with the system they had.

      One example, the legislative services for the State of Nevada uses our reporting system and can generate all reports their legislature needs with fewer employees than they needed using the old system.

      We’re just one little example. There are almost certainly boatloads of places where using the best tools, systems, approach, etc can make a significant difference in how much people can get done.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

92 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!