(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(D) Julie Gonzales
(R) Mark Baisley
80%
20%↓
10%
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Hetal Doshi
40%
30%
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(R) Kevin Grantham
80%↑
20%↓
(D) Diana DeGette*
(D) Milat Kiros
(D) Wanda James
70%
20%
10%↓
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Dwayne Romero(D) Alex Kelloff
(R) Ron Hanks
50%↓
35%↑
30%↓
20%
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
80%
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
53%↓
48%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Mel Tewahade
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Shannon Bird
(D) Manny Rutinel
45%↓
30%↑
30%↑
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
As the Rocky Mountain News reports:
A state ethics panel agreed Thursday that a lobbyist orchestrated “deceitful” and “reprehensible” automated phone calls to stir up voter opposition to a homeowner protection bill.
But a majority of the three-lawmaker panel concluded that an ethics rule against lobbyists using “deceit” to influence a lawmaker doesn’t apply to the actions of William Mutch. The recommendation now goes to a panel of House and Senate leaders from both parties.
Mutch is the director and lobbyist for Colorado Concern, an alliance of business leaders who said the bill shielding homeowners against construction defects would fuel costly lawsuits.
Rep. Claire Levy, D-Boulder, said if a lobbyist “misrepresents a bill to me, that’s a clear violation of the rules.” But she said extending the rule to lobbyists’ communications with the public could turn the legislature into the “political speech” police.
Mutch’s attorney has stressed that the U.S. Supreme Court has long ruled that political speech, even when statements are false or misleading, is granted broad constitutional protection…
And we can’t wait to see what next year’s calls have to say. “Would you vote for Rep. So-and-so if you knew he/she wanted you to die? What would you say if he/she supported legislation calling for your death? Would you call Rep. So-and-so and tell him/her that you don’t want to die?”
The moral of this story? The fact that there’s no moral to this story.
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments