CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 12, 2016 12:00 PM UTC

FLASHBACK: When Cory Gardner Cared About Russia

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

MONDAY UPDATE: A statement today from Sen. Cory Gardner calls for a new Senate committee on cybersecurity, but still can’t face the hard facts:

“Cybersecurity policy is one of the most significant and complex challenges facing Congress, yet the Senate’s current structure to address cyber attacks remains inefficient. According to the Congressional Research Service, at least 19 standing committees between the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate have held hearings related to cybersecurity. That’s why I’m renewing my call for the creation of a permanent Select Committee on Cybersecurity, which would be narrowly focused on providing oversight of our strategy to protect sensitive data, defend our networks, and to deter malicious cyber actors,” said Gardner. “Recent reports from our intelligence community concluded that Russia attempted to influence the U.S. presidential election, [Pols emphasis] serving as yet another reminder of the host of emerging threats in cyberspace. These allegations must be thoroughly investigated, and I will continue to work with my colleagues to address the sanctioning of Russia and specifically, bad actors identified following an investigation.”

The problem, Sen. Gardner, is that Russia did more than “attempt” to influence the election.

They succeeded.

—–

UPDATE: A tweet from Sen. Cory Gardner last April drips with irony today:

“What is your plan for Putin?” asked Gardner. It would seem that Donald Trump has answered him.

—–

Cory Gardner, Donald Trump.

With the American public rocked by news this weekend that the Russian government intervened in the 2016 elections with the specific purpose of helping Republican nominee Donald Trump win, we couldn’t help but recall a bellicose statement from Colorado’s own Sen. Cory Gardner in October–accusing the Obama administration of not taking “the cyber threat seriously,” and vowing to introduce legislation to impose sanctions on Russia for its cyber-warfare activities:

Senator Cory Gardner (R-CO), Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific, and International Cybersecurity, today announced his intention to introduce legislation that sanctions Russia’s cyber criminals following the Obama Administration’s public accusation that Russia authorized cyber-attacks on U.S. political organizations. The legislation will mandate the Obama Administration investigate persons who have engaged in significant activities undermining cybersecurity and aggressively pursue sanctions when appropriate, similar to the cyber provision within Gardner’s North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act.

“Today’s news is further evidence of what happens when the Obama Administration fails to take the cyber threat seriously. That is why I plan to introduce legislation that builds upon my North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act by mandating the Administration sanction Russia’s bad actors who are responsible for malicious cyber activities,” said Gardner. “Russia’s interference with American democracy is a direct threat to our political process, and it may only be the tip of the iceberg. It is imperative that Russia’s behavior is met with strength in the form of aggressive sanctions to show the world that its cybercrimes will not be tolerated.” [Pols emphasis]

Got that, readers? “Russia’s interference with American democracy is a direct threat to our political process, and it may only be the tip of the iceberg.” That’s what Cory Gardner said about Russia in October, laying blame for the whole business at the feet of the Obama administration. The day after issuing this statement, Gardner called on Trump to pull out of the race after a recording of Trump making boastful comments about sexually assaulting women in 2005 surfaced.

The obvious question today is, what does Gardner have to say now? Trump is publicly bashing the intelligence agencies that concluded Russians waged cyber-warfare to help him win the 2016 presidential election. Obviously, Sen. Gardner’s press release is a major point of information now, even more so than when Gardner was calling for Trump to pull out of the presidential race in October.

Because now, Gardner is sucking up to President-elect Trump at every opportunity.

Gardner might want to make this statement go away now, but he can’t. If he holds true to the principles he asserted in this October release, he must stand up to Trump right now and demand a full accounting–regardless of where it leads. Which could be bad for Gardner’s career.

But if he reverts to “Con Man Cory” mode, the disaster could be even greater in the long term–and not just for Gardner.

Comments

7 thoughts on “FLASHBACK: When Cory Gardner Cared About Russia

  1. It's obvious Cory Gardner and Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump and all their flacks and flunkies are A-OK with Russian/Soviet/Communist backing:

    That same bottomless will to power that enabled Trump to win can be seen in the extraordinary statement that his official transition team published in the wake of the Post report. The three sentences distill Trumpism to its essence: “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. It’s now time to move on and ‘Make America Great Again.’”

    Consider the claims in order, beginning with Trump’s dismissal of the CIA. It is true that the CIA, like intelligence agencies in several other allied countries, fell for Saddam Hussein’s bluff that he still had weapons of mass destruction. But the overheated claims of imminent danger, and the ticking bomb of a nuclear program, came not from the CIA’s own analysts but from political pressure exerted by Dick Cheney and the Bush administration, which insisted the CIA’s hesitant conclusions should be discounted because the agency was allegedly filled with doves blind to the real danger only Cheney’s true believers could detect. Trump’s statement is a replication of that same debacle, substituting his own politicized judgments for the analysis of career staff. Cheneyism helped discredit the agency, and Trump is exploiting that discredit in order to impose more Cheneyism.

    Next is Trump’s claim to have won “one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history.” This is easily falsifiable — Trump won 56.88% of the electoral votes, a percentage that places him in the bottom quarter of electoral history. In this sentence, Trump also states that the election “ended a long time ago” — a curious description of an event that took place four and a half weeks ago.

    With Trump and team blatantly throwing the CIA under the bus, I can only hope there are some operators there with some (C)Old World skills left who can serve up Trump's due for all the world to see — and I'd rather see that dish served up warm and piping hot rather than cold.

  2. Please write to both of our Senators .Ask them to block confirmation of Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State, and of John Bolton as his Deputy Sec.

    The Hill writes that only three Republicans would have to cross the aisle to block these Sec. nominees. We know that Rand Paul, John McCain, and Lindsay Graham would block. Can we count on Senator Gardner, as well?

    While you're at it, call for Representative Chafee to investigate the Russian influence in our election. He was all hot to trot over HRC's emails – Trump's election caught him off guard, and now when we have credible evidence of a hostile foreign power choosing our President, Chafee is like, "Give the guy some slack – he hasn't even been sworn in yet."

  3. Show us the legislation, Sen. Gardner.  At the very least, hold hearings to determine what happened, what those in the Trump campaign knew and when they knew it.

    Senator Cory Gardner (R-CO), Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific, and International Cybersecurity, today announced his intention to introduce legislation that sanctions Russia’s cyber criminals following the Obama Administration’s public accusation that Russia authorized cyber-attacks on U.S. political organizations. –

  4. Pols made a funny. They used "Gardner" and "principles" in the same sentence. Conman Cory always was, and remains, anybody's dog that'll hunt with him. I expect no better.

    1. Indeed, skinny. This is no laughing matter and we are facing a serious threat to our nation. What will Cory do? Whatever lines his pockets. He is not only a willing recipient of benefits from the New American Kleptocracy, but, also, one of its architects.

      Prove me wrong, Cory. Man up and be an American. Resist the takeover of America by Russian Oligarchs. Say something…..today.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

66 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!