Hurricane Florence gathering in the Atlantic, several days before landfall near Wilmington, NC.
Its still too early to tell how damaging Hurricane Florence is going to be, and those aiding in the rescue under way and the recovery to come deserve our, and the government’s, full support.
But there is one thing we can almost certainly be sure of. Whether the storm lives up to its worst fears, or not, science-deniers will point to it to make fun of climate change.
“Oh,” they will say in the first case, “if it’s dry—blame climate change, if it rains—blame climate change. Well, the climate changes all the time!” Or they will say, in the second case, “Oh, see! No ‘super-storm’ ergo no climate change! Just more eco-hysteria!”
The usual brigade of followers and amplifiers will tweet and blog and push out whichever false narrative fits the ideology, and then we’ll get back to business as usual: Gutting the Clean Power Plan, slashing methane pollution regulations that protect taxpayers and the environment, walking away from the world, rolling back the clean car rules. The list of bad things done, and climate wrongs committed by this administration is noteworthy.
However you graph it, the trends are clear. Climate change is real.
For no string of extreme weather events, no list of new records replacing the last new records that replaced the ones before, no data of climbing temperatures and escalating droughts, can penetrate the bubble insulated by the love of cold hard cash. Their gain is your loss, of course. Remember, you can’t spell “trickle down” without “trick.”
By ending the methane rule Ryan Zinke’s Interior Department admits taxpayers stand to lose more than $1 billion in wasted resources. Replacing the Clean Power Plan with the Dirty Power Scam could cost 1,400 American lives every year. And no matter that the methane waste rule has support from across the nation, and in Colorado. Earlier this year, a Colorado College poll found that 7-in-10 western voters support methane waste requirements for federal public lands, including most Republicans in all states surveyed.
In May 2017, a bipartisan group of Senators rejected a Congressional Review Act resolution to repeal the BLM methane rule. For this we can thank the hundreds of thousands of Americans who contacted Congress, and who resisted efforts to sell America out to oil and gas lobbyists. But we can’t thank Cory Gardner, Colorado’s junior senator, who voted against taxpayers and our climate, and voted to repeal the methane waste rule.
Top Colorado Democrats on Tuesday accused the Trump administration of rushing to open public lands to oil and gas drilling without giving the public nearly enough time to comment.
In letters to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Sen. Michael Bennet and Gov. John Hickenlooper also asked the government not to go ahead with plans for oil and gas drilling on habitat for the greater sage grouse, a bird that Western states and federal agencies are trying to protect…
A joint federal-state program called the Sage Grouse Initiative, launched under the Obama administration, is trying to save the bird without resorting to the strict restrictions of the Endangered Species Act.
It’s ironic that, in barreling ahead with drilling in areas inhabited by the greater sage grouse, the Trump administration could thwart a somewhat controversial effort to protect the species without invoking the Endangered Species Act–by reducing the population enough to trigger the Act unequivocally! In the long run, it would be better for energy producers to cooperate with the current plan, demonstrate its success, and avoid much more stringent long-term oversight.
Unfortunately for the sage grouse, Donald Trump’s regulatory free-for-all isn’t going to last forever. And given the choice between short-term profit and long-term sustainability, energy companies will do what they will always do given the opportunity, undoing the best-laid plans of their apologists on both sides of the aisle.
The real moral of the story? Elections matter.
Sorry, that’s the answer for a lot of things right now.
The Denver Post’sBen Botkinreports on the other ballot measure to qualify yesterday for a vote in November in addition to a payday loan interest rate cap–formerly known as Initiative 108, now Amendment 74, which would dramatically alter the relationship between just about any kind of land use interest and local government:
Initiative 108 would amend the state constitution and require property owners to receive “just compensation” when government laws or regulations cause their property’s fair market value to drop.
Organizers submitted 209,111 signatures, and the Secretary of State’s office projects that 137,029 are valid.
The initiative, which is expected to appear as Amendment 74 at the ballot box, would allow Coloradans to make a financial claim on property that’s devalued because of government action. The proposal would protect water and mineral rights in addition to physical property.
At its heart, Amendment 74 would adjust how “takings claims” work under Colorado law. Right now someone can only get compensation from a direct government action when it deprives them of nearly all of their property. The change to the state constitution would broaden that range so that property owners could get compensated if property is “reduced in fair market value” by the government.
With this measure moving from the theoretical to set for a vote, word of its potentially sweeping effects is spreading–and the Colorado Municipal League is sounding the alarm:
This suggested change to the Colorado Constitution would expose both the state and all local governments to untold legal exposure with unclear language referring to government regulations or actions which would “reduce” the “fair market value” of private property and subject taxpayers to “just compensation” to a private property owner. All types of ordinances and policies at the municipal level would be affected, like code enforcement, land use and zoning, licensing, and redevelopment. Fort Collins Mayor Wade Troxell shares, “This measure places words in our state constitution that are not clear. Both the state and taxpayers in cities like my own will be subject to frivolous lawsuits. As both a Mayor and CML President, I am strongly opposed and will be voting no.”
The net effect of this measure will be an unprecedented restriction on the ability of local governments to regulate land uses within their boundaries. As we’ve said before the biggest beneficiaries of this change would be oil and gas extractive industries, but it wouldn’t stop there–and could be invoked to make the formerly routine regulation of all kinds of things you don’t want in your neighborhood prohibitively expensive. The measure’s vague language makes costly intra-governmental litigation a certainty, just to figure out what it will actually do.
We understand that with all of the controversy over split estate rights and other competing land use questions, there are vested interests like the Farm Bureau and the energy industry who are agitated and spoiling for a showdown. Wherever you land as a voter on any of the measures on the ballot this year, the message on Amendment 74–from the fractivists in Boulder to Gov. John “Frackenlooper” Hickenlooper himself–is that it wildly overshoots its mark.
Conservation Colorado announced today that it has hired well-known Democratic strategist Kelly Nordini as its new Executive Director. Conservation Colorado has been operating without an official ED since Pete Maysmithleft last September for a position with the League of Conservation Voters.
According to a press release from Conservation Colorado:
After conducting a nationwide search, Conservation Colorado today announced Kelly Nordini will be its new Executive Director. Nordini is an experienced conservationist, political strategist, and policy expert. Her decades of experience at the intersection of Colorado politics and conservation policy and her vision for the future of Conservation Colorado distinguished her from an extraordinary field of more than 100 candidates.
Nordini has extensive experience in public policy, political strategy and campaigns, and community organizing, as well as a background in management. She was previously a partner at Hilltop Public Solutions, where she led efforts to advance clean energy policies in Colorado. She has also held leadership positions at Western Conservation Foundation and Project New America, and she served as Deputy Chief of Staff for Governor Bill Ritter…
…Conservation Colorado is the largest state-based environmental advocacy organization in the country with nearly 40 staff, five offices across the state, and 40,000 members. The organization spent $1.3 million in the 2016 elections and had a 90 percent win rate of its endorsed candidates.
Conservation Colorado has long been the most influential environmental advocacy organization in the state. It was renamed in 2012 when it formed like Voltron in a merger of Colorado Conservation Voters and Colorado Environmental Coalition.
You can read the full press release after the jump:
A press release from the Department of Energy announces the Secretary of Energy hisself, former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, will tour Golden’s National Renewable Energy Lab tomorrow accompanied the always-cherubic Sen. Cory Gardner:
On Tuesday, August 14, 2018, U.S. Secretary of Energy Rick Perry will travel to the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, CO. While there, he will tour the Energy Systems Integration Facility and the Science and Technology Facility with Senator Cory Gardner. They will see first-hand the wide range of research and development being conducted at the lab – from high-performance computing to solar materials research.
Perry and Gardner will also stop by the NREL Partner Forum and then provide open press remarks and answer employee questions at an all-hands meeting. Following these events, they will hold a brief media availability.
Readers will recall that now-Secretary Perry famously pledged to abolish the Department of Energy if elected President–sort of, since he couldn’t remember the name of the agency when pressed to identify which departments of the federal government he would abolish in a debate. Once Donald Trumpnominated Perry to serve as the Secretary of the very same Department of Energy–which we assume, when you get right down to it, was Trump making some kind of joke–Perry expressed “regret” at having made such a rash policy prescription.
Whatever the fate of the Department of Energy as a whole, NREL itself has been subjected to several periods of uncertainty by Republican administrations and Congresses, but it does appear that the GOP has bigger fish to fry between now and the November elections. That is, staying in power, and kicking renewable energy to please the fossil fuel industry isn’t a good look for Republicans going into this particularly hostile midterm.
So hooray! Rick Perry loves…what’s that place again?
UPDATE: It appears that the Energy Accountability Project (or whatever) fixed the misspelling of “accountability” in their logos on their website and Twitter account sometime after this post went live. Unfortunately, “accountability” is misspelled in, well, every piece of content they’ve ever released into the wild!
Like this one:
And this one:
And this one:
And so forth. It’s probably time to mash the reset button on this misbegotten little campaign–or maybe just, you know, delete. After which somebody at the Colorado Oil and Gas Association should show themselves out.
All the money in the world, and no one to proofread. Imagine.
After Kyle Clark at 9NEWS took issue with a “fact-checking” website run by the Colorado Oil and Gas Association–secretly at first, disclosing their ownership only after being called out–we took a closer look at the operation. There’s nothing inherently wrong with an entity setting up a clearinghouse of their own opinions, but two aspects of the site struck journalists as objectionable to the point of having a chilling effect: its secretive nature as well as “index pages” devoted to shaming individual reporters by calling out their alleged misdeeds. Those pages have reportedly been taken down.
But the larger reason this effort appears to have backfired spectacularly among the very people it was meant to influence is that it’s happening at the same time as President Donald Trump’s vicious rhetoric against the news media has ramped up to a fever pitch in recent weeks. Media fact-checking sites as we’ve come to know them generally focus on fact-checking the statements of politicians and opinionmakers, not reporters: though it’s true that Fox News-style “journalism” has made that distinction trickier. COGA’s fact-checking site, on the other hand, directly went after the reporters. Considering that the President of COGA, Dan Haley, worked for the Denver Post for many years, we’re shocked that he didn’t realize how this would be received by his former peers.
To be clear, being critical of news reporting, and even individual reporters is not wrong. We’ve done plenty of that in this space. But to target reporters systematically like this site did — at the same time that the President of the United States treads perilously close to inciting violence against journalists — it all feeds into the hatred of the media Trump wants his supporters to feel. And for the same reasons.
The only other thing we can recommend to the Energy Accountability Project and its former newspaper editor leader, is this…
► Republican Rep. Devin Nunes of California — the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee — may have spoken a little too openly about the 2018 election in a speech to donors recently. From the Washington Post:
It was in private, at a closed-door fundraiser for a Republican colleague, that Nunes took the new step of tying the investigation to the midterm elections this fall. In comments captured in an audio recording aired Wednesday by “The Rachel Maddow Show,” Nunes laid out in stark terms the rationale for preserving the GOP majority in Congress.
“If Sessions won’t unrecuse and Mueller won’t clear the president, we’re the only ones, which is really the danger,” Nunes said at an event for Republican Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington, referring to Jeff Sessions, the attorney general, and Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel. Sessions said last year that he would keep his distance from inquiries related to the 2016 election, owing to his role in Trump’s campaign — a move that has frustrated the president, leading him to blame his own attorney general for the “Russian Witch Hunt Hoax.”
“I mean, we have to keep all these seats,” Nunes added. “We have to keep the majority. If we do not keep the majority, all of this goes away.”
“All of this goes away” probably sounds pretty good to a lot of voters right now. “Must protect Trump?” Not so much.
There’s been quite a bit of discussion among Colorado journalists lately regarding a new website called “The Energy Accountability Project” (EAP), which appears to be little more than a media bashing tool that is half-heartedly disguised as a “fact checking” resource. We’ll have more discussion on the EAP site a bit later in this space, but first let’s get you caught up on the controversy and the O&G industry’s boneheaded responses to criticism.
The EAP website launched with a menu that listed individual reporters by name, which understandably didn’t make reporters very happy. Even former Colorado journalists found the site to be a massive #FAIL. As former Colorado Springs Gazette reporter Peter Marcuswrote on Twitter:
When trying to convince the media and public that fracking is a safe practice, aligning with a Trump narrative that the media is the enemy of the people won’t get you any traction. Surprised the well-funded OilandGas industry would make such a poor calculation.
9News journalist Kyle Clark was irritated enough that he spoke out on his 6:00 pm show “Next With Kyle Clark”:
Anonymous oil & gas industry website attacks journalists by name. Kyle calls on them to come out of the shadows. pic.twitter.com/6FxK9b8oFl
The purveyors of the EAP website have since made significant changes to the layout, including removing menu items linking to individual reporters in favor of links to news organizations instead. The folks at EAP also responded to criticism after they initially refused forgot to disclose their financial backers, which includes the Colorado Oil & Gas Association, but that mea culpa was packaged in another box of #FAIL. Check out this message posted to the EAP site from Dan Haley of the Colorado Oil & Gas Association:
We were asked by 9News this week if the Colorado Oil & Gas Association was supporting this website, and we said yes. Whenever anyone asked, we said yes. We should have been forthcoming with that at the beginning. As Kyle Clark pointed out, it would have been better to follow the example of other industry journals and websites by listing our support.
If you’re waiting for the punchline, you won’t be disappointed. As you can see from the screenshot below, the EAP rated its own statement as totally great!
FOX 31’s Joe St. Georgewalks us through the latest ad from the Republican Governor’s Association targeting Democratic gubernatorial nominee Jared Polis in the now-familiar “hippie-punching” style we’ve side-eyed in this space before.
Under the fact-checking microscope, this ad is revealed to have some serious issues with every single one of its claims that viewers need to be aware of:
Exact quote in ad: “How Boulder is Jared Polis? – Polis is so Boulder he is skipping the Grand Junction debate the first candidate in decades to blow off the Western Slope”
St. George very generously scores this as the only “true” claim in the whole spot, though even that has a big disclaimer:
Polis will not “blow off” the Western Slope in his campaign. In fact he has agreed to a separate Grand Junction debates hosted by PBS, Colorado Mesa University and the Grand Junction Sentinel. [Pols emphasis]
Polis has also had a field office open for months in Grand Junction and tweeted out photos campaigning with his LG pick last month.
The truth here, as our readers have discussed in some depth, is that Polis will not be attending one particular debate in Grand Junction hosted by regional advocacy group Club 20. Opinions of that decision vary, but Polis will still be debating opponent Walker Stapleton in Grand Junction at the PBS/Mesa State debate. We’d say that makes the vague language in this ad false enough to call out as such, but at least St. George gives us the whole story.
As for the rest of this ad? St. George quickly dispatches with a claim we expect to hear a lot between now and the election, that Polis’ campaign pledge to move the state to renewable energy sources would “destroy energy jobs.” Reading the study cited in the ad, there’s a whole other side to the coin: the tens of thousands of new energy jobs that would be created by the switch to renewables. Much like the bogus assessment of a “Medicare for All” plan “costing trillions,” when it would in fact save trillions, dishonest actors intentionally leave out the critical second half of the equation.
It’s good to see mendacious ads getting scrutiny early in the campaign season. There will be many more.
We’ve been monitoring the strange story of what appears to have been a multi-pronged insider effort to derail Initiative 97, the controversial ballot measure to dramatically increase setbacks between oil and gas wells and so-called “surface development”–that is, homes and schools built over somebody’s else’s mineral rights. After one petition gathering firm left the state with tens of thousands of signatures, another admitted on tape they were paid by an as-yet unknown entity to stop collecting signatures. Despite these hurdles, the campaign turned in over 170,000 signatures yesterday and still hopes to make the ballot.
In the meantime, the Colorado Independent’sSusan Greenereports on still more shenanigans against the Initiative 97 campaign, again involving the petition contractor who was paid to abandon the effort, and this time involving the “respectable” Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce:
Chamber President and CEO Kelly Brough told The Independent Friday that when her group learned Petition Connection was also gathering signatures for Colorado Rising, it told FieldWorks to stop using Petition Connection to gather signatures for its proposed transportation measure. That measure seeks a 0.62 percent statewide sales tax to pay for transportation and transit.
“We try not to have our (petitions) carried along with issues we would not support,” Brough said, noting that her board has opposed the fracking limitation measure.
Asked if her members in the oil-and-gas industry pressed her to split with the company, she said no…
But that’s not what others are saying:
Sean Duffy, spokesman for the Chamber-affiliated transportation ballot measure campaign, acknowledged later Friday that the oil-and-gas industry “along with a number of other businesses” in the Chamber are very concerned about the setback measure getting on the ballot and were uncomfortable with signature collectors gathering petitions for it at the same time they were gathering petitions for the transportation measure.
“They said, ‘Yeah, that’s a conflict for us’,” Duffy said.
As for the still-unknown party responsible for paying Petition Connection to walk away from the Initiative 97 campaign?
Brough said her group had “nothing to do with that payment” to Fessler.
“Absolutely not,” she emphasized.
But given that Kelly Brough is being more or less directly refuted by Sean Duffy on the original question, we would call her denial unsatisfying at best. There is a lot more to know about what the oil and gas industry did to thwart this initiative, from paying off contractors to their intimidating and aggressive “Decline to Sign” campaign featuring belligerent young men sent to heckle individual petition gatherers. These unsavory tactics stretch, if not the law, at the very least the bounds of civility in politics. It is not behavior that should be honored or rewarded.
We can only say again that all of this can be true even if you don’t agree with the initiative in question, and we recognize that universal 2,500-foot setbacks between wells and homes are not universally supported even among Democrats. The point is that if such dirty deeds become the norm in Colorado politics, everybody is worse off.
► National Security Adviser John Bolton says President Trump’s good buddy Kim Jong Un isn’t actually following up on any promises made during a summit meeting in June. From the Washington Post:
National security adviser John Bolton said Tuesday that North Korea has not made progress toward denuclearization in a dismal acknowledgment that comes nearly two months after President Trump held a historic summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Singapore.
“The United States has lived up to the Singapore declaration. It’s just North Korea that has not taken the steps we feel are necessary to denuclearize,” Bolton said in an interview on Fox News Channel on Tuesday morning…
…The Trump administration has consistently sought to reassure critics Kim will make good on his pledges to denuclearize. Last month, Trump tweeted he had “confidence that Kim Jong Un will honor the contract we signed &, even more importantly, our handshake” in Singapore.
“Well, that’s a surprise,” said absolutely nobody.
► It’s Primary Day in a bunch of states across the country, with most eyes on a special election for a Congressional seat in Ohio. Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, and Washington also hold Primary Elections today. The New York Times lays out what to watch for today, including this confusing Democratic Primary in Washington:
In the solidly Democratic Ninth District, Representative Adam Smith, a longtime congressman with a top position on the House Armed Services Committee, is facing a primary challenge from Sarah Smith, a democratic socialist. On the surface, this looks a lot like New York’s 14th District, where another democratic socialist, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, beat Joseph Crowley, a longtime congressman with a powerful leadership position. Ms. Smith has encouraged the comparison, while Mr. Smith has emphasized the differences between the two races — including the fact that Ms. Ocasio-Cortez was born and raised in her district, while Ms. Smith lives just outside this one.
As the Washington Post reports, 2018 is a bad year for Republican Lieutenant Governors to be seeking higher office.
► Climate Change is very real, and we could be reaching a dangerous tipping point. From CNN:
Scientists are warning that a domino effect will kick in if global temperatures rise more than 2°C above pre-industrial levels, leading to “hothouse” conditions and higher sea levels, making some areas on Earth uninhabitable…
…Hotter temperatures could result in sea level rise up to 60 meters (197 ft) from today’s shorelines, swamping coastal populations and forcing communities inland. This summer dozens of people have died in wildfires and heat waves from the US to Asia, giving the world an insight into what could lie ahead.
The report says that if the “threshold” — a theoretical point-of-no-return — is crossed, this “would lead to a much higher global average temperature than any interglacial in the past 1.2 million years and to sea levels significantly higher than at any time in the Holocene,” referring to the geological age which began at the end of the last ice age, around 12,000 years ago.
Liberty Oilfield Services CEO Chris Wright speaks to the crowd before introducing Rep. James Coleman (right) at last week’s “Energy Proud” event in Denver.
On July 26, State Rep. James Coleman (D-Denver) cheerfully touted his 100% rating through the 2018 legislative session from Conservation Colorado, one of the state’s foremost organizations focused on conservation and environmental policies. Coleman even acknowledged his 100% rating by Tweeting a message with the tagline, “Thanks for your support!.”
Seven days later, Coleman was a featured speaker at an “Energy Proud” event organized to praise the many wonders of oil and gas extraction and the controversial process of hydraulic fracturing. The event was heavily promoted by oil and gas interests, including the Colorado Oil and Gas Association (COGA), that are generally not worried about any of the conservation and environmental stewardship ideals that Coleman boasted about one week earlier.
A former Interior Department Secretary called people working in the oil and gas industry “revolutionaries” and Colorado officials said energy issues transcended traditional party lines at a rally in Denver Thursday.
The “Energy Proud” event was hosted by energy companies on the west steps of the state Capitol before a few thousand people, and comes just days before an August 6 deadline for anti-oil and gas proponents to submit signatures for a proposed 2,500-foot setback in Initiative 97.
“It’s not often that I get to speak to a crowd of revolutionaries,” said former Interior Department Secretary and former Colorado Attorney General Gale Norton. “That’s exactly what you are because you have accomplished a revolution.” [Pols emphasis]
This was all a carefully-orchestrated public relations effort for the oil and gas industry — or the “revolutionaries,” as Gale Norton called them — as they seek to drill holes in every piece of land they can find in Colorado. The cherry on top of this bullshit sundae was to find a Democratic state legislator who could be easily convinced to stand up in front of a crowd of oil and gas people and sing their praises.
Seven days earlier, James Coleman was proudly boasting about his 100% record alongside environmental group Conservation Colorado.
Enter James Coleman.
The Denver Democrat spoke briefly to the assembled crowd after an introduction from Liberty Oilfield Services CEO Chris Wright, beginning his remarks with platitudes about “hardworking Coloradans” and taking a bipartisan approach to the issue of oil and gas extraction. Here’s an excerpt from Coleman’s remarks, which you can watch in full below:
A lot of times, we put politics in front of relationships. I had the opportunity to get to know Chris Wright, the man who just introduced me, many years before I ran for office. When the recession hit in 2008, many folks got laid off. But his company, Liberty — which is why I’m proud of him and what he’s done — he didn’t lay off one person because of what was happening in the economy. [Pols emphasis] That is the kind of person that we need.
These are some interesting comments from Coleman. Did he come up with these remarks himself, or did he just repeat talking points that were handed to him? The reason we ask is because Chris Wrightlaunched Liberty Oilfield Services in 2012. Its predecessor company, Liberty Resources, was founded in 2010. Liberty didn’t lay off anyone following the 2008 recession because the company didn’t yet exist.
Anyway, let’s get back to Coleman’s talking points:
These are the kind of people that we need. The kind of leaders who care about people and take care of Coloradans. Because at the end of the day, all we care about it providing for our families, serving our neighbors and our communities, putting clothes on our backs, food on the table, roofs over our heads. That’s what you all do and are allowing us to do because of the great work you do here in the state. Thank you for all you do.
According to a Denver Post investigation, in the eight months following a deadly April 2017 gas explosion in the town of Firestone, at least a dozen explosions and fires have been associated with industry pipelines along Colorado’s Front Range. That area is part of the Southern Rocky Mountains.
Republican gubernatorial candidate Walker Stapleton was also a featured guest at the “Energy Proud” event, and he gleefully played up Coleman’s statements in a separate interview:
“I think it’s really important to recognize, as James Coleman said, that this shouldn’t be a partisan issue,” Stapleton told Western Wire. [Pols emphasis]
Representative Coleman is running for re-election in HD-7, a safe Democratic district in northeast Denver with a sizable minority population and low-income communities of color. In fact, HD-7 contains a larger percentage of African-Americans and Latinos than any other state legislative district in Colorado. Coleman’s district is also near the Suncor Oil Refinery that regularly spews hydrogen cyanide gas across north Denver.
Maybe Coleman really believes that he is a true conservationist who listens to the concerns of the people in his district but genuinely supports the oil and gas industry anyway. Maybe not. Either way, you can be sure that voters are going to be regularly reminded of Coleman’s duplicitous nature should he ever attempt to seek higher office in Colorado.
When President Trump flatly declared on Twitter that his son held that Trump Tower meeting in the full expectation of receiving dirt on Hillary Clinton, he may have done more than concede that collusion did, in fact, take place. He may have also inadvertently pointed to a motive for his repeated efforts to obstruct the Russia investigation — possibly strengthening the case that he obstructed justice. [Pols emphasis]
Much of this morning’s chatter about Trump’s Twitter admission over the weekend focuses on two important facts about it, but not on that one. In the tweet, Trump stated forthrightly that the Trump Tower gathering “was a meeting to get information on an opponent.” However, we know from Donald Trump Jr.’s emails before the meeting that he — along with son-in-law Jared Kushner and campaign chair Paul Manafort — took this meeting in the full expectation of getting “information on an opponent” that would be furnished by the Russian government.
As many newsaccounts and analyses point out, Trump has now flatly conceded to that collusion more directly than ever before. As those accounts also point out, in so doing, Trump has also revealed that the statement he helped dictate about this meeting in the summer of 2017 — which claimed it was primarily about adoptions — was a lie.
Trump’s Tweet seems to have been a response to a Saturday story in the Washington Post indicating that the President is indeed worried about legal trouble for eldest son Donald Trump, Jr.:
Trump has confided to friends and advisers that he is worried the Mueller probe could destroy the lives of what he calls “innocent and decent people” — namely Trump Jr., who is under scrutiny by Mueller for his role organizing a June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with Russians promising dirt on Hillary Clinton. As one adviser described the president’s thinking, he does not believe his son purposefully broke the law, but is fearful nonetheless that Trump Jr. inadvertently may have wandered into legal jeopardy.
► Republicans are chewing their fingernails to the nub over Tuesday’s special election in Ohio for an open Congressional seat. From Politico:
The entire Republican Party machinery has converged on this suburban Columbus district for a furious eleventh-hour campaign aimed at saving a conservative House seat and averting another special election disaster.
But in the final days ahead of Tuesday’s election, signs were everywhere that Democrats are surging — from recent polling to the private and public statements of many Republicans, including the GOP candidate himself. The district has been reliably red for more than three decades, but the sheer size of the Republican cavalry made clear how worried the party is about losing it…
…The all-out push underscores the GOP’s trepidation about the final special election before the midterms. A loss, following startling Republican defeats in Pennsylvania and Alabama, would offer more evidence that a blue wave is on the horizon. And it would further fuel fears of what’s becoming evident: that Democrats are simply more amped up, even in areas that have long been safely Republican.
► As the New York Times reports, the Trump administration is poking another stick at European allies:
The Trump administration said it would restore sanctions on Iran that had been lifted under the 2015 nuclear accord at midnight on Monday, ratcheting up pressure on Tehran while worsening a divide with Europe.
The new sanctions are a consequence of President Trump’s decision in May to withdraw from the nuclear deal with world powers. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on Sunday that the goal was to get Iran to change its ways — including ending all nuclear enrichment and curbing its weapons programs, as well as ending its support of brutal governments or uprisings in the Middle East.
European officials have said that the Iran nuclear agreement is crucial to their national security. International inspectors have concluded that Iran is complying with the accord.
Marianne Goodland of the Colorado Springs Gazettereports:
Proponents of a ballot measure they claim will strengthen private property rights turned in a record 209,000 petition signatures Friday to the secretary of state.
Initiative 108 is a constitutional proposal for the November ballot that its chief sponsor, Colorado Farm Bureau, says will allow private property owners to take state or local governments to court when their property is devalued. The ballot measure doesn’t identify the kind of private property that could be taken, but examples include mineral, oil and gas, or water rights…
Initiative 108 becomes the second constitutional ballot measure under more stringent signature requirements approved by voters in 2016 under Amendment 71, aka “Raise the Bar,” which CFB supported.
The effects of this initiative would be potentially devastating to local governments responsible for just about any kind of land-use policy. Although proponents cite anecdotal examples of various controversial takings that property rights holders could sue over, the overwhelming beneficiaries of this initiative would be oil and gas rights holders in areas where people live and work. It would turn Colorado’s “split estate” system of separate surface and mineral rights into a cash cow for mineral rights holders at the direct expense of everyone else. Acting to protect residents from drilling in residential areas could mean bankruptcy for your town.
Don’t let the “record number of signatures” fool you into thinking this ballot measure enjoys authentic popular support. Goodland reported last week that five different pay-per-signature petition gathering firms were working on this ballot initiative. It’s true that since the passage of Amendment 71 in 2016, constitutional ballot measures have become harder to qualify for the ballot–but not impossible, and the scale of this effort demonstrates that constitutional measures are still very much within reach of those who have the means. Like the oil and gas industry, who not coincidentally has the ways and means to commit dirty tricks against initiatives they don’t like.
For most citizens of Colorado, “Raise the Bar” simply raised the bar above their heads.
What, you don’t want a car that averages 8 miles per gallon of gasoline?
As the Washington Post reports, President Trump is moving ahead with plans to gut fuel-efficiency standards for vehicles:
The Trump administration announced plans Thursday to freeze fuel-efficiency requirements for the nation’s cars and trucks through 2026 — a massive regulatory rollback likely to spur a legal battle with California and other states, as well as create potential upheaval in the nation’s automotive market.
The proposal represents an abrupt reversal of the findings that the government reached under President Barack Obama, when regulators argued that requiring more-fuel-efficient vehicles would improve public health, combat climate change and save consumers money without compromising safety.
“We will fight this stupidity in every conceivable way possible.”
— California Gov. Jerry Brown
President Trump’s plan also would revoke California’s long-standing legal waiver to set its own tailpipe restrictions, granted under the 1970 Clean Air Act, which the state has used most recently to try to curb greenhouse-gas emissions. It also would restrict the ability of states to follow California’s lead — something a dozen states and the District of Columbia already have done.
The likely legal clash over the policy threatens to rupture the nation’s auto market, doing away with uniform national standards negotiated by the Obama administration and potentially forcing automakers to produce different vehicles to meet standards in different states — something the industry has said it does not want. [Pols emphasis]
That last sentence is particularly important to note. The big automobile manufacturers don’t want this policy implemented any more than American farmers want Trump to introduce more tariffs, but considering the input and interest of others isn’t exactly a top priority for this administration.
An analysis from the Trump administration claims that halting fuel-efficiency targets at 2020 levels could save $500 billion in something they call “societal costs.” Of course, that same analysis also shows that U.S. fuel consumption would increase by about half a million barrels of oil each day — contributing to further Climate Change problems because of increased greenhouse-gas emissions.