WEDNESDAY UPDATE: The Colorado Independent follows up:
Dana Barker was 77 years old and the head of the Garfield County Democratic Party in 2006 when he took on then 30-year-old rising Republican star Josh Penry in the race for State Senate’s District 7 on Colorado’s energy-rich Western Slope.
Barker said he got the former Mesa State College football star from Grand Junction to sign a pledge stating that none of the candidates in that SD-7 race would seek higher office or quit to take another job before fulfilling the full, four-year term at the State Capitol in Denver. [Pols emphasis]
Penry, now 33 and the Senate’s minority leader, earlier this month said he wouldn’t resign his term, which runs through 2010, as he campaigns for the governor’s mansion in Denver.
“The impression I had then [in 2006], and it continues to this day, is that Josh is a very motivated and very ambitious guy and he wants to rise as high as he can, presumably as fast as he can, too,” Barker, now 80, said in a phone interview Tuesday.
A message left for Penry at his campaign headquarters Tuesday was not returned.
We were reminded late yesterday of this 2006 article from the Colorado Independent:
There have been some surprises for the race to win the Senate District 7 in Mesa County between Republican Josh Penry and Democrat Dana Barker. First, it was the age difference between Penry and Barker. The second shocker was when the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel endorsed Barker. Third, was the bombshell that Barker dropped on Penry at the recent Club 20 meeting in Grand Junction-and this was captured on camera.
First photo: Just minutes after this cordial greeting between Penry (left) and Barker (right), Barker makes a statement in front of the large Club 20 audience about the “Candidate’s Plege” he had written. He then hands Penry a copy to sign. The pledge states that the winner of the SD7 race will not seek another office while serving the four-year term… [Pols emphasis]
Photo 3: Apparently caught off guard and contemplating the signifigance of the pledge, Penry’s facial expression signals he’s in deep thought. What should he do?
…Photo 6: “Should I really do this?” Penry’s rubbing his ear as if he’s just not sure he’s making the right move for his political career…
Photo 7: The handoff! Penry gives the signed pledge over to Barker, who also puts his signature on it.
It would appear that sometime between then and now…Josh Penry decided it wasn’t the “right move” after all.
Penry backers will assert that he is ‘keeping the pledge’ by continuing to serve in the Senate next year while he runs for Governor. But that’s not how this pledge plainly reads–committing to not seek higher office while serving in your present one is done to allay concerns that a candidate will be too busy campaigning to represent their constituents effectively.
We read correctly that Penry is moving to Denver, didn’t we?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Early Worm
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Genghis
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: allyncooper
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
…shocked, I tell you.
It would be funny when Penry moves to Denver and the citizens he represents in SD 7 petitions to remove him from office for not living in his district.
This is embarassing even by your standards, Pols. Didn’t you all just get done last week beating the shit out of Penry for pledging to finish out his term and keep his post as Minority Leader while running for Governor? Wasn’t his commitment to serve out his term verified in a Denver Post story a week or so ago?
On one hand you beat him up for keeping his pledge to serve out his term. On the other hand you try to gin up outrage about it.
You guys are struggling.
And as a Penry lemming, Ram2010 has already been caught lying here. But to the sane people of Colorado, Penry’s deceit does matter.
I even checked with Mr. Barker and his campaign manager to make sure Penry signed the promise. But you see, this is what the people who have followed Penry’s ego driven career know. It is NEVER what is good for the people of Colorado for Penry. It is always about what will feed his ambitions. And if lying will get him there, so be it.
I am firmly of the belief that Colorado has never had such a politician as detrimental to our state as Josh Penry. Now everyone knows that Penry’s word of honor is not worth the paper it is written on.
“Is anyone else here tired of the flimflam, mealy-mouthed Republican?” –Josh Penry
Barker asked Penry to sign a pledge that he’d serve out the entire term and not leave to run for a different position. That’s what Penry pledged and that’s what he’s doing.
How did Dana Barker do in the general election, by the way? Did you ask his “campaign manager” that question?
“I like to blow goats.” — WesternSlopeThought
has a difficult time reading and understanding facts. But the pledge reads:
TaxCheat isn’t very good at spinning Penry lies. We can only hope that Penry’s lemmings, like TaxCheat, keep showing their ignorance.
Oh, and Pols has warned you TaxCheat. Your falsely attributing a quote to someone about your sexual desires may indeed get you banned.
Maybe Penry thinks it’s a three-year term.
I was there, after all. The discussion at the time was about a specific office–that being the Third CD seat held by John Salazar. Barker was trying to get Penry to commit that he wouldn’t leave his seat mid-term to run for Congress.
I remember that Penry agreed and said that he would not leave his seat mid-term.
Pols: why don’t you post the signed pledge? Seems to me that might clear up any ambiguity–unless you don’t actually have a signed copy?
how inexperienced he is. Who would sign a pledge like that? That’s called the ‘ol bait and switch.
Did Penry never sign it now? Is that what you cheeseheads are falling back on?
Why doesn’t Penry “clear up any ambiguity”–unless he doesn’t actually have a signed copy?
Indeed it would be great to have a copy coop.
I myself think it would make a wonderful campaign T-shirt for Ritter.
Plus, make about 1,000 copies of it and hand it out at any campaign event. Nice.
From Ralphie:
I didn’t think a legislator was allowed to raise money while in session. Is this true?
And if so, how is Penry going to run for governor (which of course necessitates raising money) while serving in the legislature?
Can someone please enlighten me?
I hereby announce announce that I will not seek, nor shall I serve if somehow elected, the office of governor of the State of Colorado in 2010.
Oh wait, candidates can’t coordinate their campaigns with 527s. I forgot.
you’re Scott McInnis and then you get away with coordinating your campaign with (cough) 527s:
http://completecolorado.com/mc…
But thanks for making the explicit connection…
(including the governor) can’t raise money from lobbyists or their clients while the legislature is in session.
reminds me of BeWitched.
I’m of the mind that it says “serve out the full SD7 term” thus preventing Senator Penry from doing a CD3 run in 2008, in which, he could still go back to State Senate, even in a loss — there was a lot of speculation that such a thing would happen, and technically, even in losing, such an act would’ve greatly increased Penry’s name ID statewide, particularly in Pueblo
Notice also that Barker said, (paraphrasing) “this letter will help John Salazar” at the end of the article, on the Colorado Independent site
Overall – I’d like to see a copy of this pledge (paging Barker) – I’m not working for the Penry campaign, but I’m feeling that the details behind this one are being inaccurately reported – my apologies if I’m wrong
He won’t return calls.
-Colorado Independent
is that Penry would limit his career options by signing the pledge in the first place.
Although, the picture of him struggling with the political consequences of turning down Barker’s offer is priceless.
Kudos to Mr. Barker for being perceptive enough to see Penry for what he was (and still is); a career politician who is only interested in promotion via election.
He knew he was a sacrificial lamb in that campaign, but he played the role with style and grace and was a very good sport about it.
That was wonderful theater on his part.
He’s a very, very smart and good-natured guy. Would have made a good legislator. Lives in the wrong Senate district to get elected as a Dem.