As Brian Heuberger reported for the Colorado Statesman this week, there may be Republicans in Colorado willing to publicly support parts of the new administration’s agenda–but on the subject of Colorado’s legal marijuana industry, which is under direct threat from Attorney General Jeff Sessions, there is no daylight between Colorado Republicans and Democrats:
With U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions hinting that the Trump administration might intensify the enforcement of federal marijuana laws, Colorado leaders from both sides of the aisle have come to the defense of the state’s legal marijuana industry in an uncommon show of solidarity in what many consider to be divisive political times of unmatched proportion.
High-level Colorado politicians like Republican U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner and Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper have both publicly defended what has become a lucrative recreational marijuana industry for the state. And many other state officials have joined them in contending that Colorado has a constitutional right to legalize marijuana and that the regulations established by the state have been statistically proven to have been effective so far.
Supporters are quick to emphasize the positive economic impact the industry has had in Colorado and the likely downward economic spiral that would occur should that now-bustling industry be tampered with by the federal government.
Likewise, both Rep. Mike Coffman and Colorado Attorney General Cynthia Coffman are promising to fight any move by Sessions to clamp down on marijuana in Colorado:
Rep. Mike Coffman is suggesting he might use the power of the purse to protect Colorado’s legal marijuana industry…
If Sessions does take action Coffman said he’d “have to fight the Attorney General on this.” He suggested he’d do so through congress’ power to appropriate money for the administration’s budget.
Colorado’s Republican attorney general, Cynthia Coffman—a legalization opponent who says she would defend state law against Sessions—speculated, “It sounds like there is room for states to have legalization … But what it seems to portend is the federal government will be at the borders to stop marijuana from crossing state lines.”
The reason why you have all of these public officials in both parties standing shoulder-to-shoulder on marijuana, despite the fact that most of them opposed legalization to begin with, is that the experience of legalized marijuana in Colorado has rendered the issue moot here. Public support has grown, not declined, since Colorado led the way into a legalization trend that has now grown to numerous states–including all-important California, the most populous state in the nation.
In short, on this issue, our local Republicans and Democrats are responding to the clear wishes of their constituents. They know that to join Sessions on a crusade against legal pot would be politically disastrous for Colorado Republicans at this point. And the fact is, if Sessions does decide to shut down Colorado’s billion-dollar legal marijuana industry and in the other legalized states, Republicans could pay dearly at the polls in the next election all over the country including Colorado–regardless of what local Republicans do to oppose it.
So be at least a bit reassured, stoners. For the moment, both parties have got your back.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: sagebrush
IN: Rep. Jeff Hurd Switches To Tele Town Halls Ahead Of “Drill Baby Drill” Bill
BY: davebarnes
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Wong21fr
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Gorky Pulviczek
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Wong21fr
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Bennet, Hick Hard “NO” On Republican Spending Resolution
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Teller County Sheriff Guy Launches Half-Assed Campaign for Governor
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Bennet, Hick Hard “NO” On Republican Spending Resolution
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
is that the same AG that lied under oath to the US Senate?
Paging Moldy, party of one. Your table is ready.
Credit where it's due. Both sides are stepping up and defending the votes of their citizens, I don't care for the stuff, myself, but I sure do like all that nice tax money we're raking in. It looks like other states were salivating over the money, too; which is why legalization referenda are popping up all over. If the Feds had any sense (I made a funny), they'd get hip to a new source of revnue, too.
And, BTW, When are actual doctors going to call the Feds bluff on medical research on cannabis? Isn't about time NIH did some testing on real cannabis rather than that sorry patch of ditchweed they've been growing and breeding back on itself at the University of Mississippi for the last 70 years?
Spot on, skinny. If Trump is looking for savings in the federal budget he might start there and then contract the work out to the grown-ups in Israel.
God bless our freedumbs! Only in Merrika could we simultaneously have cannabis on Schedule 1 and our government owning the patent for its medicinal use.
While Sessions wants you to believe 'the marijuanas' are for bad people, the ones of the legally-prescribed nature continue to take their toll on everyday Americans.
But why bother BigPharma (they won't) with such statistics when they fund entire political campaigns? It's much easier to go after a disproportionate number of black and brown people and keep yet another powerful lobby, the Private Prison Industrial Complex, rich and happy?
In other news, there are a number of scientific studies (yes, they're real, Moldy) that support the premise that cannabis has extensive health applications. (Many of these sub-components of the plant are bountiful in the industrial hemp plant. Last year, Colorado farmers grew half of the industrial hemp in the entire United States.
The words used, even in articles like this, often confuse people. Both marijuana and industrial hemp are the genus Cannabis. Just like your chihuahua and your St. Bernard are both dogs. What separates marijuana (not a scientific word) from industrial hemp is the level of THC, the threshold being .3%. Schedule 1 doesn't differentiate between hemp-derived products and those coming from marijuana. To the feds, it's all treated as the dreaded 'marijuana' with certain exemptions for the stalk of the plant.
Our trolls can hate on cannabis – but their comments generally expose their ignorance. For Pear's benefit, I'm not conflicted on this issue, either. I support ending Prohibition on the entirety of the cannabis plant. I just happen to work in the policy field on the industrial hemp side of the industry. Creating cannabis opportunities for our farmers is a good thing.
Interesting that George Brauchler is on page 2A of the Post, under the headline "16 people indicted in massive home-grown marijuana operation across Denver area". He is apparently shocked … shocked, I say … to find out that criminal enterprise happens in the light of day.
Suppose there is some Republican positioning for future political endeavors?
Nah. That's a silly idea, JiD