President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

52%↑

48%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 14, 2009 07:13 PM UTC

RGA: Colorado Not In "Best Case Scenario" in 2010

  • 37 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

(Many commenters have been (rightly) confused as to why this map includes states in 2010 that are not even in play. See the update below. – promoted by Colorado Pols)

UPDATE: This map is part of a presentation created by the RGA earlier this year called The Four Year Plan. It’s possible the map below is mislabeled and should say “Best Case 2012,” but the message is the same either way: Colorado would still have a Democratic Governor under the best case scenario laid-out by the RGA.

We’ve found it a little curious that the Colorado Governor’s race is rarely listed among the top 10 most likely to switch parties nationally, but perhaps there’s good reason for that. Check out this image from a presentation made recently by the Republican Governor’s Association (RGA), which maps out a state-by-state “Best Case Scenario”:

So what does this mean? Well, it means that polling doesn’t look favorably on Republican chances to retake the governor’s office in Colorado, and more importantly, it means that the RGA isn’t likely to spend a lot of national money helping Republicans to defeat Democrat Bill Ritter in 2010.  

In other words, Scott McInnis and Josh Penry, good luck…but you’re on your own.

Comments

37 thoughts on “RGA: Colorado Not In “Best Case Scenario” in 2010

    1. Linda Lingle was due to a perfect storm and her 8 years in office has not improved things for the Repubs there. On the Dem side you have Neil Abercrombie who is really well liked throughout the state and has held one of the 2 congressional seats there forever.

    1. True, and IIRC there are about 16 or so more states that run gubernatorial elections with the presidential. Some of them must also show as switching from Dem to ‘pub on that map.

  1. Makes absolutely no sense.

    Washington doesn’t have a Governor’s race in ’10. Nor does Montana. Nor North Carolina. Nor Missouri. Nor Delaware. All are Dem held right now.

    Wow. Shoddy work.

    Projection-wise, as well, this means they think that Ritter is less vulnerable than an open Governor’s race in Hawaii (the 2nd most Dem state in the country), Rhode Island (the 3rd), or Nevada (where their Governor is going through a nasty divorce and his Lt. Gov has been indicted).

    Color me confused.

    1. I can’t believe they let their logo get imprinted on this amateur hour piece of work! The Republican Governors Association doesn’t even know what governor seats are/aren’t up. That doesn’t leave anyone with the sense they have a grasp of their core mission.  

  2. may be the reason for Wadhams pimping Scooty.  Penry has been on the public dole, in one way or another, his entire adult life.  Scooty is sitting on that pile of cash which may ease Wadhams’ sleepless nights worrying about pecuniary obligations.  

        1. is such ridiculously old news. Apart from Colorado Pols readers and the odd political reporter or two, no one else knows he exists anymore.  

  3. I would discount it completely, and I don’t view it as an accurate indicator as to where they will or won’t spend money.

    Those judgements are typically made once the primaries are settled and the candidates are sized up.  Sometimes it is done before hand, but there isn’t even an announced candidate for our side.

    In short, this seems more like a Pols pipe dream.

      1. This map is so stupid, I have a hard time believing that it was actually lifted from the RGA website.  Where is the link that shows it there?  Usually this is included in such assertions.  If this wasn’t directly from their website, I would discount it entirely.

        Aside from the states that don’t even hold elections, it is listing states that just don’t make any sense.  Why is New Jersey blue?  Corzine has been trailing there for months.

          1. I mean seriously, I would be questioning your source at this point

            Sorry Pols, but since the source isn’t entirely….solid, your anaylisis is even less so.  Ever consider the possibility that the information was “leaked” as a form of misdirection?  Or to out someone else or make someone look stupid?  I am genuinely surprised that you all have put any stock in this.

              1. The above map that is supposedly from the RGA lists New Jersey as being blue.  But the link you gave me which is from the RGA website shows that New Jersey is a prime pick up opportunity.

                According to Pols’ flawed assumption that the above map is a good indicator, the RGA isn’t planning on spending money on oen of their prime pick up opportunities.

                Pols’ information is flawed, just like their conclusion.  It is wishful thinking on their part.

        1. The existence of the map itself is talked about in a Sept 08 article here.  http://www.stateline.org/live/

          So, no; not from “earlier this year.”

          One other thing, if repubs are too dumb to put together a coherent map, why would you trust their assumption that CO will stay blue in 2010?

          I’m just sayin…  🙂

    1. As usual Pols trying to claim insider GOP info when in reality…they’re just pulling it out of the asses 99.999% of the time.

      When is the last time that either the RGA or the DGA did any significant media buys in Colorado?  Comparing the RGA/DGA to the RNCCC/DNCCC or RNSC/DNSC is apples and oranges.

      Nor does the map mean much in an electoral environment that is changing week to week.  NOBODY has any idea who will be spending money ANYWHERE in 18 months.  Except Nostradamus and Coloradopols.

  4.  New homemade sign has popped up on I-25: WHY DOES RITTER HATE EL PASO CTY?

    Made me think, RITTER? Hell, why do El Paso County VOTERS hate El Paso County?

  5. And Missouri and Washington state DO hold their gubernatorial races in presidential years because Christine Gregory  and Jay Nixon were just elected last Nov.  How are those two going to change from blue to red in ’10?

  6. The stupid Republicans are too blind to see McInnis would do better against Ritter and Penry is ONLY liked in the party. McInnis at least has some room to grow (at least more then Penry)

  7. If you’re looking for an accurate assessment of the race from a respected pundit, check out Charlie Cook.  He puts it at leans Dem.  Ritter is still a favorite, though declining by the day, and one of the most vulnerable incumbent Democrat Governors.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

79 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!