( – promoted by Colorado Pols)
Note: This interview comes from our D.C. bureau where your intrepid reporter interviewed Representative Salazar at his office here in Washington, D.C. No expense is too great to bring our readers these interviews. (Plus I was in D.C. for a trade show.)
John Salazar exudes quiet competence. Yes there’s his policies, his outlook, his reasons for being there and that matters too. But throughout the conversation you have someone who is clearly competent and yet makes no big deal of his knowledge and success. And in fact downplays it. This is a very common trait in very effective people in most jobs – including politics.
He started off talking about his background and family. He is very proud of his family, and especially his parents. He is also very proud that he is a farmer. There are now only 4 or 5 farmers in the House – a big drop from the early days of our country when the majority were. (This is due to the fact that under 2% of the workforce now farms.) This is where John Salazar comes from – family, community, & farming.
He then talked about the death of bipartisanship. He initially thought I was a Republican (clearly he does not read my posts here), probably because I told him my mom is an elected Republican. So he was challenging me on the present Republican approach of refusing to cooperate on anything and instead playing everything for political advantage. He dates that change to the ascendency of Newt Gringich.
I mentioned my theory that the change was that Newt & Co. fought us Dems on everything, even when they agreed with what was proposed, because in that fight they gained political advantage. And in that effort of always putting political advantage before country, they changed the dynamics. John did not disagree with that.
He clearly wants to work in a bi-partisan manner. But he also sees the present Republican approach, and Rush Limbaugh’s statements, as detrimental to the country and to the political comity in Washington. In other words, when the Republicans are willing to seriously work in a bi-partisan manner, John Salazar will be happy to do so. He is proud that he was able to work with Marilyn Musgrave on some farming issues. But he clearly does demand that it be true bipartisanship.
So here’s my theory as to why he got the appropriations gig. Yes a lot of things go into that decision. But I think a major part is both his quiet competence and his willingness to work in a true bipartisan manner. To get the bulk of the job done on appropriations this is exactly what you need – some representatives concentrating on the work and doing it well.
So what is he working on? Well the Army is not going to get Pinon Canyon as long as John Salazar has a breath left in his body. The one thing that got him riled up was when he would discuss how you had issues where on one side you have lobbyists and large organizations and on the other side you have a bunch of individuals with no political oomph. He sees his most important job in the House to be an advocate for those that have no power in a contest such as Pinon Canyon.
When asked about his priorities his #1 priority is the economy and jobs. He paid due homage to this issue and discussed how the stimulus bill is already starting to have some impact. But it was a short discussion on this issue.
Then came energy. And here there was a lot more detail, a lot more discussion. He wants to see major Major MAJOR efforts into renewables. He was ticking off every renewable source I have ever heard of and for biofuels he listed stuff I had never heard of before (there’s that farming background). And it was intelligent as well as facing both what we do know and what we have to figure out (there’s that quiet competence part).
He talked about clean coal, stating that we have to figure out how to do it, but that we have such an overabundance of coal that this is a technology that we must figure out. He talked about nuclear, how it clearly is safe, specifically referencing the Navy’s nuclear program, and how storage is the big issue. He also talked about how nuclear waste can be recycled. And he gave realistic numbers for how much of our energy can come from renewable sources in the near future.
What’s even more impressive than his clear knowledge of where we sit on energy, is he is willing to lay out all of the pieces to the puzzle even though many of these parts get some interest groups really upset. This is someone who is putting what this country needs to do before what is their optimal political stand.
Finally came healthcare. He did not dive into it like he did energy but he had one great observation. He said that we clearly can provide everyone with very basic healthcare without increasing our costs, because the present system is presently so honked up. Not fancy, not a large menu of options – but very basic care. And he also said that as a country it is our responsibility to provide this as a right for each citizen.
I also asked him if he gets any downtime. That got a laugh. He has times in D.C. where there are 5 meetings in his offices and he is moving between all 5 as they go on. He is working from when he wakes up till when he falls asleep in D.C. and in Colorado he has the largest district in the state. But he then went on to talk about the joy in travelling all over the state, the beauty of the vistas, the importance of meeting his constituents to hear their concerns. And how he’s going home every weekend so he can see his wife & kids.
A Rep who works at the job has a really hard life. Clearly what drives John Salazar is he sees that his efforts makes things better for his constituents, for Colorado, and for the country. With that as his motivation, it makes for a good legislator.
So what do we get with Representative John Salazar? I think being on appropriations means that John, unlike most other Reps, is tasked with the big picture issues we face. But even in that position, being effective requires concentrating in a few areas. He will stay on top of farming issues. He will pay attention on the economy and healthcare – having certain goals on each. But my guess is he’ll have the most impact on energy. Oh, and if he sees the weak being tromped on by the powerful – watch out.
first published at Liberal and Loving It
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Sunmusing
IN: Rep. Jeff “Bread Sandwich” Hurd Draws MAGA Primary Challenger
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Colorado Says Hell No To Mobilizing National Guard
BY: Powerful Pear
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Powerful Pear
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
So, does any other Colorado media have a D.C. presense? If not, this makes ColoradoPols the only media in the state with a presense in D.C. (granted – a 3 day presense).
I do think the Denver Post will be gone in 5 years, which will be too bad. But we will have sites like Pols and in the breadth of these alternatives we will get a different type of reporting. Not better, not worse – different.
It’s going to be interesting to see how this plays out. But our elected representatives (with some rare exceptions) are talking to us bloggers. So reporting in some form will continue.
🙂
and I didn’t know ColoPols had presents!
this is hagiography, not reporting. And we’ve always had that.
Then it becomes demonology. 🙂
I’ve been turned down by a number of elected officials. With that said, I do think Udall has declined my interview offer because of the things I said about him.
Keep in mind that I don’t go in with the same 5 questions everyone else is hitting them with that day because then I add nothing to the conversation.
And I don’t beat on them on issues I disagree with them on because I don’t think that’s a very interesting conversation for anyone else (unless you agree with me on that issue).
What I try to do is get a picture of who they are and what they are going to focus on over the next couple of years. And I try to have some questions that are unexpected and will draw out some real responses.
And with that said, it’s a short interview, they have a story they are trying to sell that, even if it’s close to reality, is still a purposeful impression.
But notwithstanding all those caveats, I have been told on a number of these by people who are close to the elected official, that I got an accurate snapshot. Some of course I got better than others.
The thing is, if there are a bunch of us taking different approaches to what we write, how we research the writing, our approach, etc – out of that mass we will get some pretty good coverage.
….as they see themselves. You are essentially a longer, much more narrowly distributed, press release from the elected official.
I have no doubt of that. I’m sure they are also thrilled with the elected official’s latest campaign brochure and believe in their hearts it’s an accurate snapshot.
David, you’re to be commended for doing these tongue baths — I mean, interviews, but they’re not a substitute for reporting, even placed in some matrix of other tongue baths or lashings.
but RG is right, your “blogger > traditional media” comment was a little bit narrow-minded. Politicians talk to kids in D.C. for their school papers all the time–that doesn’t mean that they’re somehow a replacement for real reporters.
I love to blog, but I consider myself a political activist more than a reporter. We write here as if we’re writing newspaper copy sometimes, but it’s all one big editorial. I’m not saying reporters don’t have opinions, but if you’re not going to ask the tough questions, or the questions that are on people’s minds, then you can’t really call yourself a true reporter.
You know I’m not a huge fan of the prose style, but I think that enough people enjoy them that you should keep at it. You’re really getting much better at it too.
I think hard-core in-depth reporting is the toughest hurdle for us bloggers. But we do have people like Josh Marshall at TPM doing it. I think we’ll see a couple of people here in Colorado start blogging at this level.
The trick is what to write on. For something like EFCA they will all tell us if they are for it or against – and why. It’s the stories that are not on the radar unless someone writes that are so valuable.
ps – thank you for the props. I am definitely learning as I do each of these.
They probably quite accurately convey what’s it’s like to sit down and chat with the politicians, and that’s something I enjoy doing with folks on both sides of the aisle. They’re just no substitute for real reporting.
After all, just a snapshot of the man and what’s not to be impressed by? Maybe Rep. Salazar has an uncontrollable flatulence problem, but it’s hard to fault the guy on issues or successes. (Hello, Rep. Lamborn.)
Rep. Salazar has qualities that any citizen should admire, regardless of party affiliation.
I first met him when he ran for the state leg for the first time in ’02. As we all know he quickly moved to a successful candidate for Congress. I hope, especially for those who live in the 3rd CD, that he has a long career there.
I’m in Salazar’s district and I’m largely happy with his work. The bankruptcy bill would be a big strike against him but he has done a very good job of staying on top of voters’ opinions in the district.
My biggest concern right now is on health insurance and I’m heartened to hear that is a top priority for him. Also, the energy potential in Colorado is huge. The Four Corners Power Plant, the largest contributor of nitrous oxide, could be replaced with solar panels if the entire area used by the plant were covered with the panels. And that calculation was done about 10 years ago. There has been some increase in efficiency so it could be even better. The point would be that our potential for all kinds of alternative energy sources is huge. It’s the one thing that I think we can credit the Ritter admin with.
thank you very much for the interview, I appreciate your approach to the interviewee and agree that an aggressive approach isn’t very useful in this setup.
thank you everyone for the nice comments.