U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Michael Bennet
(D) Phil Weiser
60%↑
50%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
60%↑
40%↑
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) J. Danielson
(R) Sheri Davis
50%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(D) Jeff Bridges
(R) Kevin Grantham
40%
40%
30%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
February 24, 2009 08:35 PM UTC
13 Comments
Bennet showed up to ask his question and then disappeared. Instead of hanging around to learn about banking, he’s off calling people who might help fund his campaign, I suspect.
Is that like “This page intentionally left blank”? Because I don’t see anything remotely like a pun there.
but perhaps not executed?
But that’s ok and not particularly surprising.
Wait, is that your pun? You were listening to the testimony on the radio? Good one, AS. The punster.
In order to feel superior, AS has to put his opponents down. This also gives him an excuse not to engage in debate, where his arguments were torn to shreds by posters who understand the topic.
This is a new twist: Inserting a “pun intended” note where one was not written. (Confidential to AS: When Bennet was billed as “bright,” they weren’t talking about sunshine.)
that is so wickedly clever none of us can grasp it. It’s a pun of Joycean proportions. When his mastery becomes evident, we will smack our foreheads so hard we’ll get concussions.
I have to hand it to Mike May, Romanoff outshines him. This is just another example of the junior chamber chairman being hired to run the real chamber.
It obviously shows here. May’s recommendation that the Guv appoint Romanoff was a legitimate, heartfelt and thoughtful recommendation.
who expressed his wariness a couple of times about the possibility of “creeping nationalism” taking place in our banking system at the hands of our government.
has rather sailed already, hasn’t it?
If only we’d let the S&Ls work things out on their own — moral hazard, President’s son, oversupply of residential units and all. When will we learn?
Repeat after me, free marketers – we need regulation enforcement. We need regulation enforcement. We need regulation enforcement.
Why?
Because business is amoral. (Not immoral, mind you, but amoral.)
Left on its own, this is what the free market does, because everyone is looking out for number one. Businessmen and women do not turn down any opportunity for profit, and do not ask any hard questions about where this path to profit may take us.
Only government regulation, drafted with an aim to preserving competition and protecting consumers, and enforced by people who know that it’s a necessarily adversarial job, keeps stuff like what we’re going through from happening.
Not the free market. It won’t look out for the free market, it just looks out for number one.
http://jeffcopols.com/showDiar…
But “creeping nationalism” is another matter entirely. “Creeping nationalism” sounds like Corker’s political outlook, rather than our governmental policy.